宾根胚胎学的希尔德加德:使妇女在没有种子的情况下具有生殖能力。

IF 0.1 4区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
Minji Lee
{"title":"宾根胚胎学的希尔德加德:使妇女在没有种子的情况下具有生殖能力。","authors":"Minji Lee","doi":"10.13081/kjmh.2024.33.697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines Hildegard of Bingen's embryological theory within the intricate landscape of medieval medicine and religion. It situates Hildegard's understanding of conception within ongoing historical debates surrounding the roles of male and female reproductive substances, particularly the concept of seed or semen. By analyzing her conceptual framework against prevailing classical and medieval reproductive theories, the research illuminates Hildegard's distinctive contribution to understanding conception as a holistic bodily process. Classical embryological discourse predominantly oscillated between Aristotle's one-seed theory-which positioned men as sole generative agents-and Galen's two-seed theory, which marginally acknowledged female reproductive participation. While technically aligning with Aristotelian principles by denying female semen, Hildegard diverged significantly by valorizing women's reproductive agency. she argued that women produced a foam essential for new life, just as essential as the man's semen. Also, the female reproductive body played a crucial role in purifying and nurturing the defective male semen, enabling conception. This conceptualization subtly challenged contemporary gender hierarchies, presenting reproduction as a complex, interdependent physiological mechanism with theological resonances, making the parallels of the woman's reproduction and God's creation. In conclusion, Hildegard's embryological theory presents a sophisticated intellectual intervention that reimagined female reproductive potential within medieval scientific and religious frameworks.</p>","PeriodicalId":42441,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Medical History","volume":"33 3","pages":"697-731"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855046/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hildegard of Bingen's Embryology: Enabling Women's Reproductive Power without Seed.\",\"authors\":\"Minji Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.13081/kjmh.2024.33.697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper examines Hildegard of Bingen's embryological theory within the intricate landscape of medieval medicine and religion. It situates Hildegard's understanding of conception within ongoing historical debates surrounding the roles of male and female reproductive substances, particularly the concept of seed or semen. By analyzing her conceptual framework against prevailing classical and medieval reproductive theories, the research illuminates Hildegard's distinctive contribution to understanding conception as a holistic bodily process. Classical embryological discourse predominantly oscillated between Aristotle's one-seed theory-which positioned men as sole generative agents-and Galen's two-seed theory, which marginally acknowledged female reproductive participation. While technically aligning with Aristotelian principles by denying female semen, Hildegard diverged significantly by valorizing women's reproductive agency. she argued that women produced a foam essential for new life, just as essential as the man's semen. Also, the female reproductive body played a crucial role in purifying and nurturing the defective male semen, enabling conception. This conceptualization subtly challenged contemporary gender hierarchies, presenting reproduction as a complex, interdependent physiological mechanism with theological resonances, making the parallels of the woman's reproduction and God's creation. In conclusion, Hildegard's embryological theory presents a sophisticated intellectual intervention that reimagined female reproductive potential within medieval scientific and religious frameworks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":42441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Medical History\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"697-731\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11855046/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Medical History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2024.33.697\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13081/kjmh.2024.33.697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了宾根的希尔德加德的胚胎学理论在中世纪医学和宗教的复杂景观。它将希尔德加德对概念的理解置于正在进行的围绕男性和女性生殖物质角色的历史辩论中,特别是种子或精液的概念。通过分析她的概念框架与流行的古典和中世纪生殖理论,该研究阐明了希尔德加德对理解概念作为一个整体身体过程的独特贡献。古典胚胎学的论述主要在亚里士多德的一种种子理论和盖伦的两种种子理论之间摇摆,前者将男性定位为唯一的生殖媒介,后者略微承认女性的生殖参与。虽然希尔德加德在技术上与亚里士多德的原则一致,否认女性的精液,但在强调女性的生殖能力方面却有很大的分歧。她认为女人产生的泡沫对新生命至关重要,就像男人的精液一样重要。此外,女性生殖体在净化和培育有缺陷的男性精液,使其受孕方面发挥了至关重要的作用。这一概念巧妙地挑战了当代的性别等级制度,将生殖视为一种复杂的、相互依存的生理机制,并与神学产生共鸣,将女性的生殖与上帝的创造相提并论。总之,希尔德加德的胚胎学理论提出了一种复杂的智力干预,在中世纪科学和宗教框架下重新想象了女性的生殖潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hildegard of Bingen's Embryology: Enabling Women's Reproductive Power without Seed.

This paper examines Hildegard of Bingen's embryological theory within the intricate landscape of medieval medicine and religion. It situates Hildegard's understanding of conception within ongoing historical debates surrounding the roles of male and female reproductive substances, particularly the concept of seed or semen. By analyzing her conceptual framework against prevailing classical and medieval reproductive theories, the research illuminates Hildegard's distinctive contribution to understanding conception as a holistic bodily process. Classical embryological discourse predominantly oscillated between Aristotle's one-seed theory-which positioned men as sole generative agents-and Galen's two-seed theory, which marginally acknowledged female reproductive participation. While technically aligning with Aristotelian principles by denying female semen, Hildegard diverged significantly by valorizing women's reproductive agency. she argued that women produced a foam essential for new life, just as essential as the man's semen. Also, the female reproductive body played a crucial role in purifying and nurturing the defective male semen, enabling conception. This conceptualization subtly challenged contemporary gender hierarchies, presenting reproduction as a complex, interdependent physiological mechanism with theological resonances, making the parallels of the woman's reproduction and God's creation. In conclusion, Hildegard's embryological theory presents a sophisticated intellectual intervention that reimagined female reproductive potential within medieval scientific and religious frameworks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信