基于价值的医疗保健中患者报告的结果措施的社会投资回报分析。

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ellie Crane, Jane Noyes, Mayara S Bianchim, Leah Mclaughlin, Adele Cahill, Gareth Roberts, Carys Stringer
{"title":"基于价值的医疗保健中患者报告的结果措施的社会投资回报分析。","authors":"Ellie Crane, Jane Noyes, Mayara S Bianchim, Leah Mclaughlin, Adele Cahill, Gareth Roberts, Carys Stringer","doi":"10.1186/s41687-025-00853-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is growing interest in the use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to improve patient and healthcare service outcomes. This study aimed to measure the social and economic value of PROMs implemented within a VBHC framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a Social-Return on Investment (SROI) analysis in Epilepsy, Heart Failure, and Parkinson's Disease services, to measure the value generated by PROMs for patients and the healthcare provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SROI analysis revealed substantial variation in the value derived from the PROMs intervention across different services. The highest value was observed in Heart Failure with an SROI ratio of 5.55:1, which represents a substantial return on investment for patients and services. In contrast, the Parkinson's Disease service had small return on investment from PROMs with an SROI ratio of 1.29:1. In Epilepsy, the social value derived from PROMs was proportionally less than the investment made, with an SROI ratio of 0.85:1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate the complexities of implementing PROMs within a clinical context, and careful consideration is likely needed in selecting suitable services and tailoring the implementation of PROMs to effectively meet specific service and patient requirements. Where PROMs yielded low or no value, the lack of return-on-investment prompts a strategic re-evaluation regarding how PROMs are funded, implemented, and utilized. As the first economic evaluation of PROMs in clinical practice, this study is a novel contribution to the emergent VBHC and PROMs evidence base. Furthermore, the findings from this study will inform recommendations to improve PROMs delivery across Wales.</p>","PeriodicalId":36660,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","volume":"9 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842646/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A social return on investment analysis of patient-reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare.\",\"authors\":\"Ellie Crane, Jane Noyes, Mayara S Bianchim, Leah Mclaughlin, Adele Cahill, Gareth Roberts, Carys Stringer\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41687-025-00853-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>There is growing interest in the use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to improve patient and healthcare service outcomes. This study aimed to measure the social and economic value of PROMs implemented within a VBHC framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a Social-Return on Investment (SROI) analysis in Epilepsy, Heart Failure, and Parkinson's Disease services, to measure the value generated by PROMs for patients and the healthcare provider.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SROI analysis revealed substantial variation in the value derived from the PROMs intervention across different services. The highest value was observed in Heart Failure with an SROI ratio of 5.55:1, which represents a substantial return on investment for patients and services. In contrast, the Parkinson's Disease service had small return on investment from PROMs with an SROI ratio of 1.29:1. In Epilepsy, the social value derived from PROMs was proportionally less than the investment made, with an SROI ratio of 0.85:1.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings demonstrate the complexities of implementing PROMs within a clinical context, and careful consideration is likely needed in selecting suitable services and tailoring the implementation of PROMs to effectively meet specific service and patient requirements. Where PROMs yielded low or no value, the lack of return-on-investment prompts a strategic re-evaluation regarding how PROMs are funded, implemented, and utilized. As the first economic evaluation of PROMs in clinical practice, this study is a novel contribution to the emergent VBHC and PROMs evidence base. Furthermore, the findings from this study will inform recommendations to improve PROMs delivery across Wales.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36660,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11842646/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00853-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-025-00853-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:越来越多的人对使用患者报告结果测量(PROMs)来改善患者和医疗保健服务结果感兴趣。本研究旨在衡量在VBHC框架内实施的prom的社会和经济价值。方法:我们对癫痫、心力衰竭和帕金森病服务进行了社会投资回报(SROI)分析,以衡量PROMs为患者和医疗保健提供者创造的价值。结果:SROI分析揭示了从不同服务的PROMs干预中获得的价值的实质性变化。最高的是心力衰竭,SROI比率为5.55:1,这代表了对患者和服务的可观投资回报。相比之下,帕金森病服务从prom中获得的投资回报很小,SROI比率为1.29:1。在癫痫中,从prom中获得的社会价值比例小于所做的投资,SROI比为0.85:1。结论:这些发现表明在临床环境中实施PROMs的复杂性,可能需要仔细考虑选择合适的服务和定制PROMs的实施,以有效地满足特定的服务和患者的需求。在prom产生低价值或没有价值的地方,缺乏投资回报促使对如何资助、实现和利用prom进行战略重新评估。作为临床实践中首次对PROMs进行经济评估,本研究对新兴的VBHC和PROMs证据库做出了新的贡献。此外,本研究的结果将为改善整个威尔士的prom交付提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A social return on investment analysis of patient-reported outcome measures in value-based healthcare.

Objectives: There is growing interest in the use of Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) to improve patient and healthcare service outcomes. This study aimed to measure the social and economic value of PROMs implemented within a VBHC framework.

Methods: We conducted a Social-Return on Investment (SROI) analysis in Epilepsy, Heart Failure, and Parkinson's Disease services, to measure the value generated by PROMs for patients and the healthcare provider.

Results: The SROI analysis revealed substantial variation in the value derived from the PROMs intervention across different services. The highest value was observed in Heart Failure with an SROI ratio of 5.55:1, which represents a substantial return on investment for patients and services. In contrast, the Parkinson's Disease service had small return on investment from PROMs with an SROI ratio of 1.29:1. In Epilepsy, the social value derived from PROMs was proportionally less than the investment made, with an SROI ratio of 0.85:1.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate the complexities of implementing PROMs within a clinical context, and careful consideration is likely needed in selecting suitable services and tailoring the implementation of PROMs to effectively meet specific service and patient requirements. Where PROMs yielded low or no value, the lack of return-on-investment prompts a strategic re-evaluation regarding how PROMs are funded, implemented, and utilized. As the first economic evaluation of PROMs in clinical practice, this study is a novel contribution to the emergent VBHC and PROMs evidence base. Furthermore, the findings from this study will inform recommendations to improve PROMs delivery across Wales.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes Health Professions-Health Information Management
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信