Jorge Isaac Peña Garcia, Sahebi Saiyed, Monica Gavaller, Elena Cabb, Katharina V Echt, Erin E Reardon, Mary Rhee, Quratulain Syed
{"title":"评估远程医疗作为老年人糖尿病患者亲自护理辅助的临床结果:研究的系统回顾。","authors":"Jorge Isaac Peña Garcia, Sahebi Saiyed, Monica Gavaller, Elena Cabb, Katharina V Echt, Erin E Reardon, Mary Rhee, Quratulain Syed","doi":"10.1089/pop.2024.0135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim was to compare clinical outcomes for older adults with diabetes who received telehealth (TH) as an adjunct to in-person care (F2F) compared with those who received in-person only care (F2F). Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to include studies involving TH care for older adults with diabetes. Two authors independently reviewed the full text of shortlisted articles. A total of four studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. One study showed slight worsening in glycemic control in the TH group, but the remaining three showed improvement or no difference between the two groups. This review shows that TH modality, when utilized as an adjunct to F2F care, has comparability to F2F alone, with similar or better glycemic control for older adults with type II diabetes, especially those residing in rural communities, those older than age 75, and those with multiple comorbidities who had multiple clinical encounters.</p>","PeriodicalId":20396,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Telehealth as Adjunct to In-Person Care for Older Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Research Studies.\",\"authors\":\"Jorge Isaac Peña Garcia, Sahebi Saiyed, Monica Gavaller, Elena Cabb, Katharina V Echt, Erin E Reardon, Mary Rhee, Quratulain Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/pop.2024.0135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim was to compare clinical outcomes for older adults with diabetes who received telehealth (TH) as an adjunct to in-person care (F2F) compared with those who received in-person only care (F2F). Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to include studies involving TH care for older adults with diabetes. Two authors independently reviewed the full text of shortlisted articles. A total of four studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. One study showed slight worsening in glycemic control in the TH group, but the remaining three showed improvement or no difference between the two groups. This review shows that TH modality, when utilized as an adjunct to F2F care, has comparability to F2F alone, with similar or better glycemic control for older adults with type II diabetes, especially those residing in rural communities, those older than age 75, and those with multiple comorbidities who had multiple clinical encounters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Health Management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Health Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2024.0135\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2024.0135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的是比较接受远程医疗(TH)作为面对面护理(F2F)辅助的老年糖尿病患者与仅接受面对面护理(F2F)的老年人的临床结果。使用以下数据库进行系统的文献检索:Ovid MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、Cochrane、CINAHL和ClinicalTrials.gov,以纳入涉及老年糖尿病患者TH护理的研究。两位作者独立审查入围文章的全文。共纳入了四项符合入选标准的研究。一项研究显示,TH组的血糖控制略有恶化,但其余三项研究显示两组之间的血糖控制有所改善或没有差异。这篇综述表明,当作为F2F护理的辅助手段时,TH模式与单独使用F2F具有可比性,对于老年II型糖尿病患者具有相似或更好的血糖控制,特别是那些居住在农村社区,年龄超过75岁的患者,以及那些患有多种合并症且多次临床就诊的患者。
Evaluating Clinical Outcomes of Telehealth as Adjunct to In-Person Care for Older Adults with Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Research Studies.
The aim was to compare clinical outcomes for older adults with diabetes who received telehealth (TH) as an adjunct to in-person care (F2F) compared with those who received in-person only care (F2F). Systematic literature search was performed using the following databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov to include studies involving TH care for older adults with diabetes. Two authors independently reviewed the full text of shortlisted articles. A total of four studies that met the eligibility criteria were included. One study showed slight worsening in glycemic control in the TH group, but the remaining three showed improvement or no difference between the two groups. This review shows that TH modality, when utilized as an adjunct to F2F care, has comparability to F2F alone, with similar or better glycemic control for older adults with type II diabetes, especially those residing in rural communities, those older than age 75, and those with multiple comorbidities who had multiple clinical encounters.
期刊介绍:
Population Health Management provides comprehensive, authoritative strategies for improving the systems and policies that affect health care quality, access, and outcomes, ultimately improving the health of an entire population. The Journal delivers essential research on a broad range of topics including the impact of social, cultural, economic, and environmental factors on health care systems and practices.
Population Health Management coverage includes:
Clinical case reports and studies on managing major public health conditions
Compliance programs
Health economics
Outcomes assessment
Provider incentives
Health care reform
Resource management
Return on investment (ROI)
Health care quality
Care coordination.