自体造血干细胞移植治疗非al淀粉样变性单克隆肾病的意义。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 TRANSPLANTATION
Mengnan Liu, Liang Zhao, Jinzhou Guo, Wencui Chen, Xiaomei Wu, Weiwei Xu, Xianghua Huang
{"title":"自体造血干细胞移植治疗非al淀粉样变性单克隆肾病的意义。","authors":"Mengnan Liu, Liang Zhao, Jinzhou Guo, Wencui Chen, Xiaomei Wu, Weiwei Xu, Xianghua Huang","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfaf036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment strategy for non-immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) remains unstandardized. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown favorable results in a limited number of studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective case-control study included non-AL amyloidosis MGRS patients diagnosed between February 2012 and July 2024; these patients were divided into the ASCT group and non-ASCT group. Baseline characteristics, ASCT characteristics and complications, treatment responses, survival outcomes, and risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 patients with non-AL amyloidosis MGRS were enrolled in this study, comprising 23 patients who received ASCT and 30 patients who did not receive ASCT. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the ASCT and non-ASCT groups, with exceptions of serum albumin and C3 levels. The median overall survival (OS) and renal survival were not reached in either group. The median PFS was significantly longer in the ASCT group compared to the non-ASCT group (58.4 vs 16.4 months, P = .004). The overall response rate (ORR) and deep response rates of the ASCT group were higher than those of the non-ASCT group, both in hematological and renal responses. In the ASCT group, 18 patients (78.3%) achieved a hematological very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and 21 patients (91.3%) achieved a renal partial response or better after transplantation. Moreover, the ASCT group exhibited higher long-term cumulative incidences of OS and renal survival. The toxicity of ASCT was manageable, and no transplantation-related deaths occurred. There was no statistically significant difference in the median PFS between monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease and light chain proximal tubulopathy (P = .539). High serum albumin level at diagnosis, and hematological response ≥VGPR after ASCT were protective factors of PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed that ASCT was an effective and safe treatment for patients with non-AL amyloidosis MGRS, thereby offering long-term hematological remission and survival benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":" ","pages":"1698-1706"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-AL amyloidosis monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.\",\"authors\":\"Mengnan Liu, Liang Zhao, Jinzhou Guo, Wencui Chen, Xiaomei Wu, Weiwei Xu, Xianghua Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ndt/gfaf036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment strategy for non-immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) remains unstandardized. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown favorable results in a limited number of studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center, retrospective case-control study included non-AL amyloidosis MGRS patients diagnosed between February 2012 and July 2024; these patients were divided into the ASCT group and non-ASCT group. Baseline characteristics, ASCT characteristics and complications, treatment responses, survival outcomes, and risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 patients with non-AL amyloidosis MGRS were enrolled in this study, comprising 23 patients who received ASCT and 30 patients who did not receive ASCT. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the ASCT and non-ASCT groups, with exceptions of serum albumin and C3 levels. The median overall survival (OS) and renal survival were not reached in either group. The median PFS was significantly longer in the ASCT group compared to the non-ASCT group (58.4 vs 16.4 months, P = .004). The overall response rate (ORR) and deep response rates of the ASCT group were higher than those of the non-ASCT group, both in hematological and renal responses. In the ASCT group, 18 patients (78.3%) achieved a hematological very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and 21 patients (91.3%) achieved a renal partial response or better after transplantation. Moreover, the ASCT group exhibited higher long-term cumulative incidences of OS and renal survival. The toxicity of ASCT was manageable, and no transplantation-related deaths occurred. There was no statistically significant difference in the median PFS between monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease and light chain proximal tubulopathy (P = .539). High serum albumin level at diagnosis, and hematological response ≥VGPR after ASCT were protective factors of PFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed that ASCT was an effective and safe treatment for patients with non-AL amyloidosis MGRS, thereby offering long-term hematological remission and survival benefits.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1698-1706\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf036\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:非al淀粉样变性肾性单克隆伽玛病(MGRS)的治疗策略尚未标准化。自体造血干细胞移植(ASCT)在有限的研究中显示出良好的结果。方法:这项单中心、回顾性病例对照研究纳入了2012年2月至2024年7月诊断的非al淀粉样变性MGRS患者;将患者分为ASCT组和非ASCT组。分析基线特征、ASCT特征和并发症、治疗反应、生存结果和无进展生存(PFS)的危险因素。结果:本研究共纳入53例非al淀粉样变性MGRS患者,其中23例接受ASCT治疗,30例未接受ASCT治疗。除血清白蛋白和C3水平外,ASCT组和非ASCT组的基线特征具有可比性。两组的中位总生存期和肾生存期均未达到。ASCT组的中位PFS明显长于非ASCT组(58.4个月vs 16.4个月,P=0.004)。在血液学和肾脏反应方面,ASCT组的ORR和深度缓解率均高于非ASCT组。在ASCT组中,18例患者(78.3%)在移植后达到血液学VGPR或更好,21例患者(91.3%)在移植后达到肾脏PR或更好。此外,ASCT组表现出更高的长期累积OS发生率和肾脏存活率。ASCT的毒性是可控的,没有发生与移植相关的死亡。MIDD与LCPT的中位PFS差异无统计学意义(P=0.539)。诊断时血清白蛋白水平高,ASCT后血液学反应≥VGPR是PFS的保护因素。结论:本研究证实ASCT对于非al淀粉样变性MGRS患者是一种有效且安全的治疗方法,从而提供长期的血液学缓解和生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for non-AL amyloidosis monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance.

Background: The treatment strategy for non-immunoglobulin light chain (AL) amyloidosis monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) remains unstandardized. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has shown favorable results in a limited number of studies.

Methods: This single-center, retrospective case-control study included non-AL amyloidosis MGRS patients diagnosed between February 2012 and July 2024; these patients were divided into the ASCT group and non-ASCT group. Baseline characteristics, ASCT characteristics and complications, treatment responses, survival outcomes, and risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.

Results: A total of 53 patients with non-AL amyloidosis MGRS were enrolled in this study, comprising 23 patients who received ASCT and 30 patients who did not receive ASCT. The baseline characteristics were comparable between the ASCT and non-ASCT groups, with exceptions of serum albumin and C3 levels. The median overall survival (OS) and renal survival were not reached in either group. The median PFS was significantly longer in the ASCT group compared to the non-ASCT group (58.4 vs 16.4 months, P = .004). The overall response rate (ORR) and deep response rates of the ASCT group were higher than those of the non-ASCT group, both in hematological and renal responses. In the ASCT group, 18 patients (78.3%) achieved a hematological very good partial response (VGPR) or better, and 21 patients (91.3%) achieved a renal partial response or better after transplantation. Moreover, the ASCT group exhibited higher long-term cumulative incidences of OS and renal survival. The toxicity of ASCT was manageable, and no transplantation-related deaths occurred. There was no statistically significant difference in the median PFS between monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease and light chain proximal tubulopathy (P = .539). High serum albumin level at diagnosis, and hematological response ≥VGPR after ASCT were protective factors of PFS.

Conclusions: This study confirmed that ASCT was an effective and safe treatment for patients with non-AL amyloidosis MGRS, thereby offering long-term hematological remission and survival benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1431
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review. Print ISSN: 0931-0509.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信