无创筛查运动试验检测二尖瓣脱垂患者冠状动脉疾病的准确性:一项系统综述

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-20 DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001701
Andrea Sonaglioni, Gian Luigi Nicolosi, Antonino Bruno, Michele Lombardo
{"title":"无创筛查运动试验检测二尖瓣脱垂患者冠状动脉疾病的准确性:一项系统综述","authors":"Andrea Sonaglioni, Gian Luigi Nicolosi, Antonino Bruno, Michele Lombardo","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the 1970s, only a few studies have evaluated the accuracy of noninvasive screening exercise tests for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in symptomatic individuals with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). The present systematic review has been designed to summarize the main findings of these studies and to assess the overall pooled estimates of sensivity and specificity of exercise ECG, exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in diagnosing CAD among MVP individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies examining the specificity and sensitivity of exercise ECG and/or exercise MPS and/or ESE in detecting obstructive CAD in symptomatic MVP patients, selected from PubMed and EMBASE databases, were included. There was no limitation of time period. The risk of bias was assessed by using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full texts of 11 studies with 840 MVP individuals were analyzed. True obstructive CAD was documented in 11.1% of MVP individuals (range 0-31.2%). When used in MVP patients with suspected CAD, exercise ECG, exercise MPS and ESE showed a pooled specificity of 61.9% (range 25-91.7%), 82.3% (range 25-100%) and 89% (range 80.5-97.6%), respectively, and a pooled sensitivity of 80% (range 50-100%), 96.7% (range 90-100%) and 91% (range 82-100%), respectively. The pooled positive predictive value was 33.2% (range 23.1-44.8%) for exercise ECG, 100% for exercise MPS and 80.2% (range 75.8-84.6%) for ESE, whereas the pooled negative predictive value was 80% (range 50-100%) for exercise ECG, 97% for exercise MPS and 99% (range 97.6-100%) for ESE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESE appears to be the first-choice screening method for CAD detection in symptomatic MVP individuals. It allows true CAD in symptomatic MVP individuals with false-positive exercise ECG results to be ruled out, without ionizing radiation exposure.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":"26 3","pages":"122-130"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of noninvasive screening exercise tests for detecting coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients with mitral valve prolapse: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Sonaglioni, Gian Luigi Nicolosi, Antonino Bruno, Michele Lombardo\",\"doi\":\"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since the 1970s, only a few studies have evaluated the accuracy of noninvasive screening exercise tests for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in symptomatic individuals with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). The present systematic review has been designed to summarize the main findings of these studies and to assess the overall pooled estimates of sensivity and specificity of exercise ECG, exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in diagnosing CAD among MVP individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All studies examining the specificity and sensitivity of exercise ECG and/or exercise MPS and/or ESE in detecting obstructive CAD in symptomatic MVP patients, selected from PubMed and EMBASE databases, were included. There was no limitation of time period. The risk of bias was assessed by using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full texts of 11 studies with 840 MVP individuals were analyzed. True obstructive CAD was documented in 11.1% of MVP individuals (range 0-31.2%). When used in MVP patients with suspected CAD, exercise ECG, exercise MPS and ESE showed a pooled specificity of 61.9% (range 25-91.7%), 82.3% (range 25-100%) and 89% (range 80.5-97.6%), respectively, and a pooled sensitivity of 80% (range 50-100%), 96.7% (range 90-100%) and 91% (range 82-100%), respectively. The pooled positive predictive value was 33.2% (range 23.1-44.8%) for exercise ECG, 100% for exercise MPS and 80.2% (range 75.8-84.6%) for ESE, whereas the pooled negative predictive value was 80% (range 50-100%) for exercise ECG, 97% for exercise MPS and 99% (range 97.6-100%) for ESE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ESE appears to be the first-choice screening method for CAD detection in symptomatic MVP individuals. It allows true CAD in symptomatic MVP individuals with false-positive exercise ECG results to be ruled out, without ionizing radiation exposure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"122-130\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001701\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自20世纪70年代以来,只有少数研究评估了无创筛查运动试验在有二尖瓣脱垂(MVP)症状的个体中检测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的准确性。本系统综述旨在总结这些研究的主要发现,并评估运动心电图、运动心肌灌注显像(MPS)和运动应激超声心动图(ESE)在MVP个体中诊断CAD的敏感性和特异性。方法:从PubMed和EMBASE数据库中选择所有研究,检查运动ECG和/或运动MPS和/或ESE在有症状的MVP患者中检测阻塞性CAD的特异性和敏感性。没有时间限制。使用美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)观察性队列和横断面研究质量评估工具评估偏倚风险。结果:分析了11项研究的全文,涉及840名MVP个体。11.1%的MVP患者(范围0-31.2%)存在真正的阻塞性CAD。当用于疑似CAD的MVP患者时,运动ECG、运动MPS和ESE的合并特异性分别为61.9%(25-91.7%)、82.3%(25-100%)和89%(80.5-97.6%),合并敏感性分别为80%(50-100%)、96.7%(90-100%)和91%(82-100%)。运动ECG阳性预测值为33.2%(范围23.1-44.8%),运动MPS阳性预测值为100%,ESE阳性预测值为80.2%(范围75.8-84.6%),而运动ECG阴性预测值为80%(范围50-100%),运动MPS阴性预测值为97%,ESE阴性预测值为99%(范围97.6-100%)。结论:ESE是诊断有症状的MVP患者CAD的首选筛查方法。它允许在没有电离辐射暴露的情况下,排除运动心电图结果假阳性的有症状的MVP个体的真正CAD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accuracy of noninvasive screening exercise tests for detecting coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients with mitral valve prolapse: a systematic review.

Background: Since the 1970s, only a few studies have evaluated the accuracy of noninvasive screening exercise tests for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in symptomatic individuals with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). The present systematic review has been designed to summarize the main findings of these studies and to assess the overall pooled estimates of sensivity and specificity of exercise ECG, exercise myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) and exercise stress echocardiography (ESE) in diagnosing CAD among MVP individuals.

Methods: All studies examining the specificity and sensitivity of exercise ECG and/or exercise MPS and/or ESE in detecting obstructive CAD in symptomatic MVP patients, selected from PubMed and EMBASE databases, were included. There was no limitation of time period. The risk of bias was assessed by using the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies.

Results: The full texts of 11 studies with 840 MVP individuals were analyzed. True obstructive CAD was documented in 11.1% of MVP individuals (range 0-31.2%). When used in MVP patients with suspected CAD, exercise ECG, exercise MPS and ESE showed a pooled specificity of 61.9% (range 25-91.7%), 82.3% (range 25-100%) and 89% (range 80.5-97.6%), respectively, and a pooled sensitivity of 80% (range 50-100%), 96.7% (range 90-100%) and 91% (range 82-100%), respectively. The pooled positive predictive value was 33.2% (range 23.1-44.8%) for exercise ECG, 100% for exercise MPS and 80.2% (range 75.8-84.6%) for ESE, whereas the pooled negative predictive value was 80% (range 50-100%) for exercise ECG, 97% for exercise MPS and 99% (range 97.6-100%) for ESE.

Conclusion: ESE appears to be the first-choice screening method for CAD detection in symptomatic MVP individuals. It allows true CAD in symptomatic MVP individuals with false-positive exercise ECG results to be ruled out, without ionizing radiation exposure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信