股骨颈系统与空心螺钉治疗Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的临床疗效比较:meta分析。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Kailun Zhuang, Jingyi Wu, Yusen Yang, Tianmo Bai, Baofeng Li
{"title":"股骨颈系统与空心螺钉治疗Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的临床疗效比较:meta分析。","authors":"Kailun Zhuang, Jingyi Wu, Yusen Yang, Tianmo Bai, Baofeng Li","doi":"10.1177/10538127241296340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the femoral neck system (FNS) has become increasingly widely used for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of FNS and the mainstream internal fixation method, cannulated screw (CS), in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched all research studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, WANFANG, and the Chinese Academic Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI) from 2018 to July 2024 and conducted data extraction. The study was conducted on July 26, 2024. We used the PRISMA guidelines to assess the quality of the results of all included studies. In addition, we searched for references to relevant articles. After completing the literature search, we performed a manual literature screening to obtain studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were Harris Hip Score, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, healing time, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis ultimately included nine studies (n = 524) and conducted quality evaluations. All nine articles were retrospective cohort studies. The study exhibited statistically significant variations between the FNS and CS groups in relation to total complications (95% confidence interval (CI)= [0.11, 0.40], odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, P < 0.001), Harris Hip Score (95%CI = [2.14, 3.65], mean difference (MD) = 2.89, P < 0.001), Femoral head necrosis (95%CI = [0.17, 0.86], OR = 0.38, P = 0.02), Internal fixation failure (95%CI = [0.06, 0.50], OR = 0.17, P = 0.001), Medium femoral neck shortening (95%CI = [0.17, 0.53], OR = 0.30, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (95%CI = [11.57, 26.80], MD = 19.19, P < 0.001), Operation duration (95%CI = [-15.20, -2.17], MD = -8.69, P = 0.009), and healing time (95%CI = [-1.30, -0.32], MD = -0.81, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis showed that in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has a shorter operative time, a lower rate of postoperative complications, a shorter healing time, less shortening of the femoral neck, and a higher Harris Hip Score compared with cannulated screws, but increases intraoperative blood loss. However, more clinical studies are needed to confirm our conclusions due to our small sample size and lack of randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":"38 1","pages":"71-82"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of clinical efficacy between femoral neck system and cannulated screw in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: A meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kailun Zhuang, Jingyi Wu, Yusen Yang, Tianmo Bai, Baofeng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538127241296340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In recent years, the femoral neck system (FNS) has become increasingly widely used for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of FNS and the mainstream internal fixation method, cannulated screw (CS), in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched all research studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, WANFANG, and the Chinese Academic Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI) from 2018 to July 2024 and conducted data extraction. The study was conducted on July 26, 2024. We used the PRISMA guidelines to assess the quality of the results of all included studies. In addition, we searched for references to relevant articles. After completing the literature search, we performed a manual literature screening to obtain studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were Harris Hip Score, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, healing time, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis ultimately included nine studies (n = 524) and conducted quality evaluations. All nine articles were retrospective cohort studies. The study exhibited statistically significant variations between the FNS and CS groups in relation to total complications (95% confidence interval (CI)= [0.11, 0.40], odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, P < 0.001), Harris Hip Score (95%CI = [2.14, 3.65], mean difference (MD) = 2.89, P < 0.001), Femoral head necrosis (95%CI = [0.17, 0.86], OR = 0.38, P = 0.02), Internal fixation failure (95%CI = [0.06, 0.50], OR = 0.17, P = 0.001), Medium femoral neck shortening (95%CI = [0.17, 0.53], OR = 0.30, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (95%CI = [11.57, 26.80], MD = 19.19, P < 0.001), Operation duration (95%CI = [-15.20, -2.17], MD = -8.69, P = 0.009), and healing time (95%CI = [-1.30, -0.32], MD = -0.81, P = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis showed that in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has a shorter operative time, a lower rate of postoperative complications, a shorter healing time, less shortening of the femoral neck, and a higher Harris Hip Score compared with cannulated screws, but increases intraoperative blood loss. However, more clinical studies are needed to confirm our conclusions due to our small sample size and lack of randomized controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"71-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241296340\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127241296340","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:近年来,股骨颈系统(FNS)在Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折中的应用越来越广泛。目的:我们进行meta分析,探讨FNS与主流内固定方法空心螺钉(CS)治疗Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折的安全性和有效性。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane、万方、中国学术期刊全文数据库(CNKI) 2018年至2024年7月的所有研究,并进行数据提取。这项研究于2024年7月26日进行。我们使用PRISMA指南来评估所有纳入研究的结果质量。此外,我们检索了相关文章的参考文献。完成文献检索后,我们进行手工文献筛选以获得符合纳入标准的研究。结果包括Harris髋关节评分、手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间、愈合时间和术后并发症。结果:该荟萃分析最终纳入了9项研究(n = 524),并进行了质量评估。所有9篇文章均为回顾性队列研究。研究显示FNS组和CS组总并发症的差异有统计学意义(95%可信区间(CI)=[0.11, 0.40],优势比(OR) = 0.21, P)。本meta分析显示,在Pauwels III型股骨颈骨折中,与空心螺钉相比,股骨颈系统手术时间更短,术后并发症发生率更低,愈合时间更短,股骨颈缩短较少,Harris髋关节评分更高,但术中出血量增加。然而,由于我们的样本量小且缺乏随机对照试验,需要更多的临床研究来证实我们的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of clinical efficacy between femoral neck system and cannulated screw in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: A meta-analysis.

Background: In recent years, the femoral neck system (FNS) has become increasingly widely used for Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Objective: We performed a meta-analysis to investigate the safety and efficacy of FNS and the mainstream internal fixation method, cannulated screw (CS), in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Methods: We systematically searched all research studies from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, WANFANG, and the Chinese Academic Journal Full-Text Database (CNKI) from 2018 to July 2024 and conducted data extraction. The study was conducted on July 26, 2024. We used the PRISMA guidelines to assess the quality of the results of all included studies. In addition, we searched for references to relevant articles. After completing the literature search, we performed a manual literature screening to obtain studies that met the inclusion criteria. The outcomes were Harris Hip Score, operation duration, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, healing time, and postoperative complications.

Results: This meta-analysis ultimately included nine studies (n = 524) and conducted quality evaluations. All nine articles were retrospective cohort studies. The study exhibited statistically significant variations between the FNS and CS groups in relation to total complications (95% confidence interval (CI)= [0.11, 0.40], odds ratio (OR) = 0.21, P < 0.001), Harris Hip Score (95%CI = [2.14, 3.65], mean difference (MD) = 2.89, P < 0.001), Femoral head necrosis (95%CI = [0.17, 0.86], OR = 0.38, P = 0.02), Internal fixation failure (95%CI = [0.06, 0.50], OR = 0.17, P = 0.001), Medium femoral neck shortening (95%CI = [0.17, 0.53], OR = 0.30, P < 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (95%CI = [11.57, 26.80], MD = 19.19, P < 0.001), Operation duration (95%CI = [-15.20, -2.17], MD = -8.69, P = 0.009), and healing time (95%CI = [-1.30, -0.32], MD = -0.81, P = 0.001).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that in Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures, the femoral neck system has a shorter operative time, a lower rate of postoperative complications, a shorter healing time, less shortening of the femoral neck, and a higher Harris Hip Score compared with cannulated screws, but increases intraoperative blood loss. However, more clinical studies are needed to confirm our conclusions due to our small sample size and lack of randomized controlled trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信