Rini Bandyopadhyay, Sumith K Mathew, Balaji Veeraraghavan, Prasanna Samuel, Jacob Backiyaraj, Sowmya Sathyendra, Priscilla Rupali
{"title":"肠道热患者血浆阿奇霉素浓度及其与临床预后的关系。","authors":"Rini Bandyopadhyay, Sumith K Mathew, Balaji Veeraraghavan, Prasanna Samuel, Jacob Backiyaraj, Sowmya Sathyendra, Priscilla Rupali","doi":"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azithromycin is the only oral option available for XDR enteric fever. Studies correlating azithromycin levels with treatment success are rare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum azithromycin levels after administration of a once-daily 20 mg/kg dose for 7 days were measured in a single-centre prospective cohort of 25 consecutive adults with blood culture-positive enteric fever. Five blood samples were collected on Day 2 after starting azithromycin, i.e. 30 min before dosing (trough), and 2, 5, 12 and 24 h after dosing. The MIC was determined for all isolates and azithromycin plasma concentration was determined using LC-MS. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Typhi accounted for 92% (<i>n</i> = 23) and <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Paratyphi 8% (<i>n</i> = 2). Ten (40%) patients received IV azithromycin, and the rest received oral therapy. The median (IQR, range) MIC for azithromycin was 4 (4-6, 3-12) mg/L. Mean azithromycin plasma concentration ranges were: trough, 0.24 ± 0.19 mg/L; 2 h, 1.24 ± 0.98 mg/L; 5 h, 0.64 ± 0.51 mg/L; 12 h, 0.31 ± 0.16 mg/L; and 24 h, 0.37 ± 0.30 mg/L. The <i>C</i> <sub>max</sub>/MIC and AUC/MIC for azithromycin were 0.29 ± 0.22 and 2.64 ± 1.64, respectively. The median (IQR, range) fever clearance time was 3 (2-3, 2-5) days and the length of hospital stay was 7 (5.5-12, 4-16) days. There was no clinical or microbiological failure, relapse or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Azithromycin was effective in treatment of enteric fever, despite low extracellular azithromycin plasma levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":14594,"journal":{"name":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","volume":"7 1","pages":"dlaf015"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836883/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma concentration of azithromycin and correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with enteric fever.\",\"authors\":\"Rini Bandyopadhyay, Sumith K Mathew, Balaji Veeraraghavan, Prasanna Samuel, Jacob Backiyaraj, Sowmya Sathyendra, Priscilla Rupali\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jacamr/dlaf015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Azithromycin is the only oral option available for XDR enteric fever. Studies correlating azithromycin levels with treatment success are rare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serum azithromycin levels after administration of a once-daily 20 mg/kg dose for 7 days were measured in a single-centre prospective cohort of 25 consecutive adults with blood culture-positive enteric fever. Five blood samples were collected on Day 2 after starting azithromycin, i.e. 30 min before dosing (trough), and 2, 5, 12 and 24 h after dosing. The MIC was determined for all isolates and azithromycin plasma concentration was determined using LC-MS. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were documented.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong><i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Typhi accounted for 92% (<i>n</i> = 23) and <i>Salmonella enterica</i> serovar Paratyphi 8% (<i>n</i> = 2). Ten (40%) patients received IV azithromycin, and the rest received oral therapy. The median (IQR, range) MIC for azithromycin was 4 (4-6, 3-12) mg/L. Mean azithromycin plasma concentration ranges were: trough, 0.24 ± 0.19 mg/L; 2 h, 1.24 ± 0.98 mg/L; 5 h, 0.64 ± 0.51 mg/L; 12 h, 0.31 ± 0.16 mg/L; and 24 h, 0.37 ± 0.30 mg/L. The <i>C</i> <sub>max</sub>/MIC and AUC/MIC for azithromycin were 0.29 ± 0.22 and 2.64 ± 1.64, respectively. The median (IQR, range) fever clearance time was 3 (2-3, 2-5) days and the length of hospital stay was 7 (5.5-12, 4-16) days. There was no clinical or microbiological failure, relapse or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Azithromycin was effective in treatment of enteric fever, despite low extracellular azithromycin plasma levels.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"dlaf015\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836883/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jacamr/dlaf015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Plasma concentration of azithromycin and correlation with clinical outcomes in patients with enteric fever.
Background: Azithromycin is the only oral option available for XDR enteric fever. Studies correlating azithromycin levels with treatment success are rare.
Methods: Serum azithromycin levels after administration of a once-daily 20 mg/kg dose for 7 days were measured in a single-centre prospective cohort of 25 consecutive adults with blood culture-positive enteric fever. Five blood samples were collected on Day 2 after starting azithromycin, i.e. 30 min before dosing (trough), and 2, 5, 12 and 24 h after dosing. The MIC was determined for all isolates and azithromycin plasma concentration was determined using LC-MS. Clinical and microbiological outcomes were documented.
Results: Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi accounted for 92% (n = 23) and Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi 8% (n = 2). Ten (40%) patients received IV azithromycin, and the rest received oral therapy. The median (IQR, range) MIC for azithromycin was 4 (4-6, 3-12) mg/L. Mean azithromycin plasma concentration ranges were: trough, 0.24 ± 0.19 mg/L; 2 h, 1.24 ± 0.98 mg/L; 5 h, 0.64 ± 0.51 mg/L; 12 h, 0.31 ± 0.16 mg/L; and 24 h, 0.37 ± 0.30 mg/L. The Cmax/MIC and AUC/MIC for azithromycin were 0.29 ± 0.22 and 2.64 ± 1.64, respectively. The median (IQR, range) fever clearance time was 3 (2-3, 2-5) days and the length of hospital stay was 7 (5.5-12, 4-16) days. There was no clinical or microbiological failure, relapse or mortality.
Conclusions: Azithromycin was effective in treatment of enteric fever, despite low extracellular azithromycin plasma levels.