加速治疗对肺癌ct治疗方案及递送质量的影响。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ryosuke Shirata, Tatsuya Inoue, Yugo Ebinuma, Akihiro Yamano, Takayuki Yagihashi, Hironori Nagata, Yumiko Minagawa, Yuki Mukai, Akiko Sato, Motoko Omura
{"title":"加速治疗对肺癌ct治疗方案及递送质量的影响。","authors":"Ryosuke Shirata, Tatsuya Inoue, Yugo Ebinuma, Akihiro Yamano, Takayuki Yagihashi, Hironori Nagata, Yumiko Minagawa, Yuki Mukai, Akiko Sato, Motoko Omura","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acceleration treatment (AT) is a novel treatment planning parameter introduced in the tomotherapy-dedicated treatment planning system, Precision. This study explores the effects of AT on tomotherapy plans using helical (TomoHelical) and direct (TomoDirect) irradiation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 20 patients with lung cancer. Initially, 10 TomoHelical and 10 TomoDirect treatment plans were created for each patient, utilizing patient-specific field width and pitch with an AT setting of 0. These original plans were subsequently reoptimized by changing only the AT values to 1, 4, 7, and 10 without changing other calculation parameters to assess the impact of AT on dosimetric and delivery parameters. Additionally, the deliverability of all plans was evaluated through patient-specific quality assurance using gamma analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing the AT from 0 to 10 led to a slight increase in maximum doses and a decrease in minimum doses within the target volume, thereby impairing dose homogeneity. Dose conformity to the target also deteriorated. Conversely, target coverage and delivery time improved considerably with higher AT values. Moreover, doses to organs at risk, including the lung, spinal cord, heart, and esophagus, remained clinically acceptable across all plans. Changes in these doses and the gamma pass rate in patient-specific quality assurance were negligible with variations in AT. This trend was consistent across both delivery techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AT is a crucial parameter in tomotherapy planning for modulating plan and delivery qualities. Higher AT values can enhance target coverage and delivery time efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":" ","pages":"e70049"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of acceleration treatment on treatment plan and delivery qualities in tomotherapy for lung cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Ryosuke Shirata, Tatsuya Inoue, Yugo Ebinuma, Akihiro Yamano, Takayuki Yagihashi, Hironori Nagata, Yumiko Minagawa, Yuki Mukai, Akiko Sato, Motoko Omura\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acceleration treatment (AT) is a novel treatment planning parameter introduced in the tomotherapy-dedicated treatment planning system, Precision. This study explores the effects of AT on tomotherapy plans using helical (TomoHelical) and direct (TomoDirect) irradiation techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study enrolled 20 patients with lung cancer. Initially, 10 TomoHelical and 10 TomoDirect treatment plans were created for each patient, utilizing patient-specific field width and pitch with an AT setting of 0. These original plans were subsequently reoptimized by changing only the AT values to 1, 4, 7, and 10 without changing other calculation parameters to assess the impact of AT on dosimetric and delivery parameters. Additionally, the deliverability of all plans was evaluated through patient-specific quality assurance using gamma analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Increasing the AT from 0 to 10 led to a slight increase in maximum doses and a decrease in minimum doses within the target volume, thereby impairing dose homogeneity. Dose conformity to the target also deteriorated. Conversely, target coverage and delivery time improved considerably with higher AT values. Moreover, doses to organs at risk, including the lung, spinal cord, heart, and esophagus, remained clinically acceptable across all plans. Changes in these doses and the gamma pass rate in patient-specific quality assurance were negligible with variations in AT. This trend was consistent across both delivery techniques.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AT is a crucial parameter in tomotherapy planning for modulating plan and delivery qualities. Higher AT values can enhance target coverage and delivery time efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e70049\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70049\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.70049","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:加速治疗(AT)是在肿瘤治疗专用治疗计划系统Precision中引入的一个新的治疗计划参数。本研究探讨了AT对使用螺旋(TomoHelical)和直接(TomoDirect)照射技术的断层治疗计划的影响。方法:本研究纳入20例肺癌患者。最初,为每位患者创建了10个TomoHelical和10个TomoDirect治疗方案,利用患者特定的视野宽度和间距,AT设置为0。这些原始方案随后被重新优化,仅改变AT值为1,4,7和10,而不改变其他计算参数,以评估AT对剂量学和输送参数的影响。此外,所有计划的可交付性通过患者特定的质量保证使用伽玛分析进行评估。结果:将AT从0增加到10,靶体积内最大剂量略有增加,最小剂量略有减少,从而影响剂量均匀性。与目标的剂量符合性也恶化了。相反,随着AT值的提高,目标覆盖范围和交付时间得到了显著改善。此外,对有危险器官的剂量,包括肺、脊髓、心脏和食道,在所有计划中仍然是临床可接受的。这些剂量的变化和患者特异性质量保证的伽马通过率与AT的变化可以忽略不计。这种趋势在两种交付技术中都是一致的。结论:AT是放疗计划的重要参数,可调节放疗计划和给药质量。更高的AT值可以提高目标覆盖率和交付时间效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of acceleration treatment on treatment plan and delivery qualities in tomotherapy for lung cancer.

Background: Acceleration treatment (AT) is a novel treatment planning parameter introduced in the tomotherapy-dedicated treatment planning system, Precision. This study explores the effects of AT on tomotherapy plans using helical (TomoHelical) and direct (TomoDirect) irradiation techniques.

Methods: This study enrolled 20 patients with lung cancer. Initially, 10 TomoHelical and 10 TomoDirect treatment plans were created for each patient, utilizing patient-specific field width and pitch with an AT setting of 0. These original plans were subsequently reoptimized by changing only the AT values to 1, 4, 7, and 10 without changing other calculation parameters to assess the impact of AT on dosimetric and delivery parameters. Additionally, the deliverability of all plans was evaluated through patient-specific quality assurance using gamma analysis.

Results: Increasing the AT from 0 to 10 led to a slight increase in maximum doses and a decrease in minimum doses within the target volume, thereby impairing dose homogeneity. Dose conformity to the target also deteriorated. Conversely, target coverage and delivery time improved considerably with higher AT values. Moreover, doses to organs at risk, including the lung, spinal cord, heart, and esophagus, remained clinically acceptable across all plans. Changes in these doses and the gamma pass rate in patient-specific quality assurance were negligible with variations in AT. This trend was consistent across both delivery techniques.

Conclusion: AT is a crucial parameter in tomotherapy planning for modulating plan and delivery qualities. Higher AT values can enhance target coverage and delivery time efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信