{"title":"急诊科患者入院分诊数据驱动预测模型:系统综述。","authors":"Hyun A Shin, Hyeonji Kang, Mona Choi","doi":"10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency department (ED) overcrowding significantly impacts healthcare efficiency, safety, and resource management. Predictive models that utilize triage information can streamline the admission process. This review evaluates existing hospital admission prediction models that have been developed or validated using triage data for adult ED patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies were selected if they developed or validated predictive models for hospital admission using triage data from adult ED patients. Data extraction adhered to the CHARMS (Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies), and the risk of bias was evaluated using PROBAST (Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, employing logistic regression and machine learning techniques. Logistic regression was noted for its traditional use and clinical interpretability, whereas machine learning provided enhanced flexibility and potential for better predictive accuracy. Common predictors included patient demographics, triage category, vital signs, and mode of arrival. The area under the curve values for model performance ranged from 0.80 to 0.89, demonstrating strong discriminatory ability. However, external validation was limited, and there was variability in outcome definitions and model generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predictive models based on triage data show promise in supporting ED operations by facilitating early predictions of hospital admissions, which could help decrease boarding times and enhance patient flow. Further research is necessary to validate these models in various settings to confirm their applicability and reliability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12947,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Informatics Research","volume":"31 1","pages":"23-36"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854635/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Triage Data-Driven Prediction Models for Hospital Admission of Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Hyun A Shin, Hyeonji Kang, Mona Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency department (ED) overcrowding significantly impacts healthcare efficiency, safety, and resource management. Predictive models that utilize triage information can streamline the admission process. This review evaluates existing hospital admission prediction models that have been developed or validated using triage data for adult ED patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies were selected if they developed or validated predictive models for hospital admission using triage data from adult ED patients. Data extraction adhered to the CHARMS (Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies), and the risk of bias was evaluated using PROBAST (Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, employing logistic regression and machine learning techniques. Logistic regression was noted for its traditional use and clinical interpretability, whereas machine learning provided enhanced flexibility and potential for better predictive accuracy. Common predictors included patient demographics, triage category, vital signs, and mode of arrival. The area under the curve values for model performance ranged from 0.80 to 0.89, demonstrating strong discriminatory ability. However, external validation was limited, and there was variability in outcome definitions and model generalizability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Predictive models based on triage data show promise in supporting ED operations by facilitating early predictions of hospital admissions, which could help decrease boarding times and enhance patient flow. Further research is necessary to validate these models in various settings to confirm their applicability and reliability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12947,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Informatics Research\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"23-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11854635/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Informatics Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/31 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Informatics Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2025.31.1.23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:急诊科(ED)过度拥挤严重影响医疗效率、安全性和资源管理。利用分诊信息的预测模型可以简化入院过程。本综述评估了现有的住院预测模型,这些模型是利用成人急诊科患者的分诊数据开发或验证的。方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、Cochrane Library。如果研究开发或验证了使用成人急诊科患者分诊数据的住院预测模型,则选择研究。数据提取遵循CHARMS(预测模型研究系统评价关键评价和数据提取清单),并使用PROBAST(预测模型偏倚风险评估工具)评估偏倚风险。结果:20项研究符合纳入标准,采用逻辑回归和机器学习技术。逻辑回归以其传统用途和临床可解释性而闻名,而机器学习提供了增强的灵活性和更好的预测准确性的潜力。常见的预测因素包括患者人口统计、分诊类别、生命体征和到达方式。模型性能曲线下面积在0.80 ~ 0.89之间,具有较强的判别能力。然而,外部验证是有限的,并且在结果定义和模型推广方面存在可变性。结论:基于分诊数据的预测模型通过促进住院情况的早期预测,有望支持急诊科手术,有助于减少住院时间并提高患者流量。需要进一步的研究来验证这些模型在不同环境下的适用性和可靠性。
Triage Data-Driven Prediction Models for Hospital Admission of Emergency Department Patients: A Systematic Review.
Objectives: Emergency department (ED) overcrowding significantly impacts healthcare efficiency, safety, and resource management. Predictive models that utilize triage information can streamline the admission process. This review evaluates existing hospital admission prediction models that have been developed or validated using triage data for adult ED patients.
Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted. Studies were selected if they developed or validated predictive models for hospital admission using triage data from adult ED patients. Data extraction adhered to the CHARMS (Checklist for Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies), and the risk of bias was evaluated using PROBAST (Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool).
Results: Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria, employing logistic regression and machine learning techniques. Logistic regression was noted for its traditional use and clinical interpretability, whereas machine learning provided enhanced flexibility and potential for better predictive accuracy. Common predictors included patient demographics, triage category, vital signs, and mode of arrival. The area under the curve values for model performance ranged from 0.80 to 0.89, demonstrating strong discriminatory ability. However, external validation was limited, and there was variability in outcome definitions and model generalizability.
Conclusions: Predictive models based on triage data show promise in supporting ED operations by facilitating early predictions of hospital admissions, which could help decrease boarding times and enhance patient flow. Further research is necessary to validate these models in various settings to confirm their applicability and reliability.