探讨细菌生物标志物在非胃肠道实体瘤中的预后和预测潜力。

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Caoimbhe Burke, Thomas Glynn, Chowdhury Jahangir, Clodagh Murphy, Niamh Buckley, Mark Tangney, Arman Rahman, William M Gallagher
{"title":"探讨细菌生物标志物在非胃肠道实体瘤中的预后和预测潜力。","authors":"Caoimbhe Burke, Thomas Glynn, Chowdhury Jahangir, Clodagh Murphy, Niamh Buckley, Mark Tangney, Arman Rahman, William M Gallagher","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2025.2465743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard clinical parameters like tumor size, age, lymph node status, and molecular markers are used to predict progression risk and treatment response. However, exploring additional markers that reflect underlying biology could offer a more comprehensive understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME influences tumor development, progression, disease severity, and survival, with tumor-associated bacteria posited to play significant roles. Studies on tumor-associated microbiota have focused on high bacterial-load sites such as the gut, oral cavity, and stomach, but interest is growing in non-gastrointestinal (GI) solid tumors, such as breast, lung, and pancreas. Microbe-based biomarkers, including <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>, human papillomavirus (HPV), and hepatitis B and C viruses, have proven valuable in predicting gastric, cervical, and renal cancers.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Potential of prognostic and predictive bacterial biomarkers in non-GI solid tumors and the methodologies used.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Advances in techniques like 16S rRNA gene sequencing, qPCR, immunostaining, and <i>in situ</i> hybridization have enabled detailed analysis of difficult-to-culture microbes in solid tumors. However, to ensure reliable results, it is critical to standardize protocols, accurately align reads, address contamination, and maintain proper sample handling. This will pave the way for developing reliable bacterial markers that enhance prognosis, prediction, and personalized treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"117-128"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the prognostic and predictive potential of bacterial biomarkers in non-gastrointestinal solid tumors.\",\"authors\":\"Caoimbhe Burke, Thomas Glynn, Chowdhury Jahangir, Clodagh Murphy, Niamh Buckley, Mark Tangney, Arman Rahman, William M Gallagher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14737159.2025.2465743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Standard clinical parameters like tumor size, age, lymph node status, and molecular markers are used to predict progression risk and treatment response. However, exploring additional markers that reflect underlying biology could offer a more comprehensive understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME influences tumor development, progression, disease severity, and survival, with tumor-associated bacteria posited to play significant roles. Studies on tumor-associated microbiota have focused on high bacterial-load sites such as the gut, oral cavity, and stomach, but interest is growing in non-gastrointestinal (GI) solid tumors, such as breast, lung, and pancreas. Microbe-based biomarkers, including <i>Helicobacter pylori</i>, human papillomavirus (HPV), and hepatitis B and C viruses, have proven valuable in predicting gastric, cervical, and renal cancers.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Potential of prognostic and predictive bacterial biomarkers in non-GI solid tumors and the methodologies used.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Advances in techniques like 16S rRNA gene sequencing, qPCR, immunostaining, and <i>in situ</i> hybridization have enabled detailed analysis of difficult-to-culture microbes in solid tumors. However, to ensure reliable results, it is critical to standardize protocols, accurately align reads, address contamination, and maintain proper sample handling. This will pave the way for developing reliable bacterial markers that enhance prognosis, prediction, and personalized treatment planning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"117-128\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2025.2465743\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2025.2465743","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

标准临床参数如肿瘤大小、年龄、淋巴结状态和分子标记物用于预测进展风险和治疗反应。然而,探索反映潜在生物学的其他标记物可以提供对肿瘤微环境(TME)更全面的理解。TME影响肿瘤的发生、进展、疾病严重程度和生存,其中肿瘤相关细菌可能发挥重要作用。肿瘤相关微生物群的研究主要集中在高细菌负荷部位,如肠道、口腔和胃,但对非胃肠道(GI)实体肿瘤的兴趣也在增加,如乳腺、肺和胰腺。以微生物为基础的生物标志物,包括幽门螺杆菌、人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)、乙型和丙型肝炎病毒,已被证明在预测胃癌、宫颈癌和肾癌方面有价值。涵盖领域:非胃肠道实体瘤的潜在预后和预测性细菌生物标志物和使用的方法。专家意见:16SrRNA基因测序、qPCR、免疫染色和原位杂交等技术的进步使得对实体肿瘤中难以培养的微生物进行详细分析成为可能。然而,为了确保可靠的结果,关键是标准化的协议,准确对齐读取,解决污染,并保持适当的样品处理。这将为开发可靠的细菌标记物铺平道路,从而提高预后、预测和个性化治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the prognostic and predictive potential of bacterial biomarkers in non-gastrointestinal solid tumors.

Introduction: Standard clinical parameters like tumor size, age, lymph node status, and molecular markers are used to predict progression risk and treatment response. However, exploring additional markers that reflect underlying biology could offer a more comprehensive understanding of the tumor microenvironment (TME). The TME influences tumor development, progression, disease severity, and survival, with tumor-associated bacteria posited to play significant roles. Studies on tumor-associated microbiota have focused on high bacterial-load sites such as the gut, oral cavity, and stomach, but interest is growing in non-gastrointestinal (GI) solid tumors, such as breast, lung, and pancreas. Microbe-based biomarkers, including Helicobacter pylori, human papillomavirus (HPV), and hepatitis B and C viruses, have proven valuable in predicting gastric, cervical, and renal cancers.

Areas covered: Potential of prognostic and predictive bacterial biomarkers in non-GI solid tumors and the methodologies used.

Expert opinion: Advances in techniques like 16S rRNA gene sequencing, qPCR, immunostaining, and in situ hybridization have enabled detailed analysis of difficult-to-culture microbes in solid tumors. However, to ensure reliable results, it is critical to standardize protocols, accurately align reads, address contamination, and maintain proper sample handling. This will pave the way for developing reliable bacterial markers that enhance prognosis, prediction, and personalized treatment planning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信