减少或预防院内处方错误的全院干预措施:范围审查。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-25 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2025.2467831
Rashudy Fatiha Mahomedradja, Steven Wang, Kim Catherina Eve Sigaloff, Jelle Tichelaar, Michiel Adriaan van Agtmael
{"title":"减少或预防院内处方错误的全院干预措施:范围审查。","authors":"Rashudy Fatiha Mahomedradja, Steven Wang, Kim Catherina Eve Sigaloff, Jelle Tichelaar, Michiel Adriaan van Agtmael","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescribing errors (PEs) in hospital care lead to patient harm, prolonged hospital stays, readmissions, and mortality. Despite interventions that successfully target 'high risk' populations in trials, PE rates remain largely unchanged in real-world settings. Existing studies often focus narrowly on specific populations, overlooking the wider complexities of hospital-wide prescribing. This scoping review evaluates interventions for adult inpatients to identify knowledge gaps in how to reduce in-hospital PEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE.com, and the Cochrane Library (inception to 13 December 2024) was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies prospectively evaluating interventions reducing in-hospital PEs were eligible for inclusion; those focusing on specific drugs, wards or populations or lacking original data were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Technological interventions, such as computerized order entry systems, accounted for 35.7% of the studies. Half addressed prescriber-related factors, such as inadequate drug knowledge and prescribing skills, while organizational factors were underexplored.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current interventions fail to address the underlying complexities, leaving critical gaps to decrease in-hospital PEs. To achieve sustainable PE reductions and improve patient safety, a multidisciplinary approach, standardized reporting, organizational reform, and a Safety-II perspective are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"529-546"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hospital-wide interventions for reducing or preventing in-hospital prescribing errors: a scoping review.\",\"authors\":\"Rashudy Fatiha Mahomedradja, Steven Wang, Kim Catherina Eve Sigaloff, Jelle Tichelaar, Michiel Adriaan van Agtmael\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14740338.2025.2467831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Prescribing errors (PEs) in hospital care lead to patient harm, prolonged hospital stays, readmissions, and mortality. Despite interventions that successfully target 'high risk' populations in trials, PE rates remain largely unchanged in real-world settings. Existing studies often focus narrowly on specific populations, overlooking the wider complexities of hospital-wide prescribing. This scoping review evaluates interventions for adult inpatients to identify knowledge gaps in how to reduce in-hospital PEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE.com, and the Cochrane Library (inception to 13 December 2024) was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies prospectively evaluating interventions reducing in-hospital PEs were eligible for inclusion; those focusing on specific drugs, wards or populations or lacking original data were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Technological interventions, such as computerized order entry systems, accounted for 35.7% of the studies. Half addressed prescriber-related factors, such as inadequate drug knowledge and prescribing skills, while organizational factors were underexplored.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current interventions fail to address the underlying complexities, leaving critical gaps to decrease in-hospital PEs. To achieve sustainable PE reductions and improve patient safety, a multidisciplinary approach, standardized reporting, organizational reform, and a Safety-II perspective are essential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"529-546\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2467831\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2025.2467831","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:医院护理中的处方错误(PEs)导致患者伤害,延长住院时间,再入院和死亡率。尽管干预措施在试验中成功地针对“高风险”人群,但在现实环境中PE率基本保持不变。现有的研究往往局限于特定人群,忽视了医院范围内处方的更广泛的复杂性。本综述评估了成人住院患者的干预措施,以确定在如何减少院内pe方面的知识差距。方法:按照PRISMA-ScR指南系统检索PubMed、EMBASE.com和Cochrane图书馆(成立至2024年12月13日)。前瞻性评价降低院内pe的干预措施的研究符合纳入条件;排除了针对特定药物、病房或人群或缺乏原始数据的研究。结果:14项研究符合纳入标准。技术干预,如计算机化订单输入系统,占研究的35.7%。其中一半涉及处方者相关因素,如药物知识和处方技能不足,而组织因素未得到充分探讨。结论:目前的干预措施未能解决潜在的复杂性,在减少院内pe方面存在重大差距。为了实现可持续的PE减少和提高患者安全,多学科方法、标准化报告、组织改革和safety - ii观点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hospital-wide interventions for reducing or preventing in-hospital prescribing errors: a scoping review.

Introduction: Prescribing errors (PEs) in hospital care lead to patient harm, prolonged hospital stays, readmissions, and mortality. Despite interventions that successfully target 'high risk' populations in trials, PE rates remain largely unchanged in real-world settings. Existing studies often focus narrowly on specific populations, overlooking the wider complexities of hospital-wide prescribing. This scoping review evaluates interventions for adult inpatients to identify knowledge gaps in how to reduce in-hospital PEs.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE.com, and the Cochrane Library (inception to 13 December 2024) was conducted following PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies prospectively evaluating interventions reducing in-hospital PEs were eligible for inclusion; those focusing on specific drugs, wards or populations or lacking original data were excluded.

Results: Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Technological interventions, such as computerized order entry systems, accounted for 35.7% of the studies. Half addressed prescriber-related factors, such as inadequate drug knowledge and prescribing skills, while organizational factors were underexplored.

Conclusion: Current interventions fail to address the underlying complexities, leaving critical gaps to decrease in-hospital PEs. To achieve sustainable PE reductions and improve patient safety, a multidisciplinary approach, standardized reporting, organizational reform, and a Safety-II perspective are essential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信