抗vegf单药治疗与抗vegf联合激光或玻璃体内糖皮质激素治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Xiaofei Yang BSMed, Yang Cao MD, Xiaoming Cao MD, Lijuan Wang BD, Xiaoxia Zhang MD, Zengyu Zhang BSMed, Xinyu Zai BSMed, Zheyi Yan MD
{"title":"抗vegf单药治疗与抗vegf联合激光或玻璃体内糖皮质激素治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析","authors":"Xiaofei Yang BSMed,&nbsp;Yang Cao MD,&nbsp;Xiaoming Cao MD,&nbsp;Lijuan Wang BD,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Zhang MD,&nbsp;Zengyu Zhang BSMed,&nbsp;Xinyu Zai BSMed,&nbsp;Zheyi Yan MD","doi":"10.1111/dom.16270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials comparing anti-VEGF monotherapy with anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for DME. The primary outcomes included the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes from the baseline. A NMA for continuous outcomes was conducted using a fixed-effects model, with mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% credible interval (CI) reported.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The NMA included 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1798 eyes. Anti-VEGF monotherapy and anti-VEGF combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy did not significantly change the mean CMT and BCVA at 6 and 12 months from the baseline. Simulation-based ranking results for mean BCVA changes suggested that anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy was likely the most effective at 6 (70.7515%) and 12 (70.9315%) months. Similar results were observed in the simulation-based ranking of mean CMT changes, suggesting that anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy was likely the most effective at 6 (83.6350%) and 12 (74.7730%) months.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Anti-VEGF monotherapy and anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy exerted comparable effects. However, the ranking chart recommends anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy. Meanwhile, anti-VEGF therapy combined with intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy did not demonstrate significant benefits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":"27 5","pages":"2679-2689"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema: A Bayesian network meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofei Yang BSMed,&nbsp;Yang Cao MD,&nbsp;Xiaoming Cao MD,&nbsp;Lijuan Wang BD,&nbsp;Xiaoxia Zhang MD,&nbsp;Zengyu Zhang BSMed,&nbsp;Xinyu Zai BSMed,&nbsp;Zheyi Yan MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dom.16270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aims</h3>\\n \\n <p>To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials comparing anti-VEGF monotherapy with anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for DME. The primary outcomes included the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes from the baseline. A NMA for continuous outcomes was conducted using a fixed-effects model, with mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% credible interval (CI) reported.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The NMA included 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1798 eyes. Anti-VEGF monotherapy and anti-VEGF combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy did not significantly change the mean CMT and BCVA at 6 and 12 months from the baseline. Simulation-based ranking results for mean BCVA changes suggested that anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy was likely the most effective at 6 (70.7515%) and 12 (70.9315%) months. Similar results were observed in the simulation-based ranking of mean CMT changes, suggesting that anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy was likely the most effective at 6 (83.6350%) and 12 (74.7730%) months.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anti-VEGF monotherapy and anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy exerted comparable effects. However, the ranking chart recommends anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy. Meanwhile, anti-VEGF therapy combined with intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy did not demonstrate significant benefits.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"27 5\",\"pages\":\"2679-2689\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16270\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://dom-pubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dom.16270","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)比较抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)单药治疗与抗VEGF联合激光或玻璃体内糖皮质激素治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的疗效。材料和方法:系统检索PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆,比较抗vegf单药治疗与抗vegf联合激光或玻璃体内糖皮质激素治疗DME的随机对照试验。主要结果包括平均最佳矫正视力(BCVA)和中央黄斑厚度(CMT)从基线的变化。使用固定效应模型对连续结果进行NMA,报告平均差异(MD)和相应的95%可信区间(CI)。结果:NMA纳入21个随机对照试验,涉及1798只眼睛。抗vegf单药治疗和抗vegf联合激光或玻璃体内糖皮质激素治疗从基线开始的6个月和12个月的平均CMT和BCVA没有显著改变。基于模拟的平均BCVA变化排序结果显示,抗vegf联合激光治疗可能在6个月(70.7515%)和12个月(70.9315%)时最有效。在基于模拟的平均CMT变化排名中也观察到类似的结果,表明抗vegf联合激光治疗可能在6个月(83.6350%)和12个月(74.7730%)时最有效。结论:抗vegf单药治疗与抗vegf联合激光或玻璃体内糖皮质激素治疗效果相当。然而,排名表推荐抗vegf治疗联合激光治疗。同时,抗vegf治疗联合玻璃体内糖皮质激素治疗并没有显示出显著的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema: A Bayesian network meta-analysis

Aims

To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the efficacy of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for diabetic macular edema (DME).

Materials and Methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials comparing anti-VEGF monotherapy with anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy for DME. The primary outcomes included the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) changes from the baseline. A NMA for continuous outcomes was conducted using a fixed-effects model, with mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% credible interval (CI) reported.

Results

The NMA included 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1798 eyes. Anti-VEGF monotherapy and anti-VEGF combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy did not significantly change the mean CMT and BCVA at 6 and 12 months from the baseline. Simulation-based ranking results for mean BCVA changes suggested that anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy was likely the most effective at 6 (70.7515%) and 12 (70.9315%) months. Similar results were observed in the simulation-based ranking of mean CMT changes, suggesting that anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy was likely the most effective at 6 (83.6350%) and 12 (74.7730%) months.

Conclusions

Anti-VEGF monotherapy and anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser or intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy exerted comparable effects. However, the ranking chart recommends anti-VEGF therapy combined with laser therapy. Meanwhile, anti-VEGF therapy combined with intravitreal glucocorticoid therapy did not demonstrate significant benefits.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信