Lisa McDaid , Anubhav Datta , Suzanne Bonington , Prakash Manoharan , James O'Connor , Peter Hoskin , Ananya Choudhury , Cynthia Eccles
{"title":"用于制定放射治疗MRI工作流程的志愿者成像的偶然发现","authors":"Lisa McDaid , Anubhav Datta , Suzanne Bonington , Prakash Manoharan , James O'Connor , Peter Hoskin , Ananya Choudhury , Cynthia Eccles","doi":"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><div>Healthy volunteer imaging is integral to optimising sequences for use in a treatment planning pathway to ensure they are fit for purpose. Although initial imaging may not be optimal quality, it may still be possible to identify abnormalities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All healthy volunteer participants recruited to approved studies aimed at optimising MRI sequences for use in radiotherapy at our institution were included. Participants were imaged on either an MR Sim (Philips Ingenia, Best, Netherlands) or MR Linac system (Unity, Elekta, Sweden), or both and each imaging time point was analysed separately.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>145 participants underwent 258 imaging sessions. Incidental findings were identified in 31 (21.3 %) participants. 96 participants were female and median age 29 years (range 22–59). Imaging was reviewed by one of four radiologists and findings categorised in terms of clinical significance. In eleven cases, onward referral was recommended: Three defined as potentially serious. Seven had a documented consultation informing participants of report findings, and actions taken. Positive predictive value was 45 % and negative predictive value 100 %. There was no difference in number of findings between imaging system (<em>p</em> = 0.15).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Rate of incidental findings compares favourably with the literature. This rate cannot be ignored, and radiotherapy services should be aware of the need to develop, and audit, procedures that appropriately manage findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MRI scanners are not routinely managed by radiotherapy services. Potentially significant findings are seen in around 4 % of healthy volunteers and the procedures around managing findings may be new to radiotherapy services.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","volume":"56 3","pages":"Article 101863"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Incidental findings in volunteer imaging used to develop radiotherapy MRI workflows\",\"authors\":\"Lisa McDaid , Anubhav Datta , Suzanne Bonington , Prakash Manoharan , James O'Connor , Peter Hoskin , Ananya Choudhury , Cynthia Eccles\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmir.2025.101863\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction/Background</h3><div>Healthy volunteer imaging is integral to optimising sequences for use in a treatment planning pathway to ensure they are fit for purpose. Although initial imaging may not be optimal quality, it may still be possible to identify abnormalities.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All healthy volunteer participants recruited to approved studies aimed at optimising MRI sequences for use in radiotherapy at our institution were included. Participants were imaged on either an MR Sim (Philips Ingenia, Best, Netherlands) or MR Linac system (Unity, Elekta, Sweden), or both and each imaging time point was analysed separately.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>145 participants underwent 258 imaging sessions. Incidental findings were identified in 31 (21.3 %) participants. 96 participants were female and median age 29 years (range 22–59). Imaging was reviewed by one of four radiologists and findings categorised in terms of clinical significance. In eleven cases, onward referral was recommended: Three defined as potentially serious. Seven had a documented consultation informing participants of report findings, and actions taken. Positive predictive value was 45 % and negative predictive value 100 %. There was no difference in number of findings between imaging system (<em>p</em> = 0.15).</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Rate of incidental findings compares favourably with the literature. This rate cannot be ignored, and radiotherapy services should be aware of the need to develop, and audit, procedures that appropriately manage findings.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>MRI scanners are not routinely managed by radiotherapy services. Potentially significant findings are seen in around 4 % of healthy volunteers and the procedures around managing findings may be new to radiotherapy services.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101863\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193986542500013X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193986542500013X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Incidental findings in volunteer imaging used to develop radiotherapy MRI workflows
Introduction/Background
Healthy volunteer imaging is integral to optimising sequences for use in a treatment planning pathway to ensure they are fit for purpose. Although initial imaging may not be optimal quality, it may still be possible to identify abnormalities.
Methods
All healthy volunteer participants recruited to approved studies aimed at optimising MRI sequences for use in radiotherapy at our institution were included. Participants were imaged on either an MR Sim (Philips Ingenia, Best, Netherlands) or MR Linac system (Unity, Elekta, Sweden), or both and each imaging time point was analysed separately.
Results
145 participants underwent 258 imaging sessions. Incidental findings were identified in 31 (21.3 %) participants. 96 participants were female and median age 29 years (range 22–59). Imaging was reviewed by one of four radiologists and findings categorised in terms of clinical significance. In eleven cases, onward referral was recommended: Three defined as potentially serious. Seven had a documented consultation informing participants of report findings, and actions taken. Positive predictive value was 45 % and negative predictive value 100 %. There was no difference in number of findings between imaging system (p = 0.15).
Discussion
Rate of incidental findings compares favourably with the literature. This rate cannot be ignored, and radiotherapy services should be aware of the need to develop, and audit, procedures that appropriately manage findings.
Conclusion
MRI scanners are not routinely managed by radiotherapy services. Potentially significant findings are seen in around 4 % of healthy volunteers and the procedures around managing findings may be new to radiotherapy services.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences is the official peer-reviewed journal of the Canadian Association of Medical Radiation Technologists. This journal is published four times a year and is circulated to approximately 11,000 medical radiation technologists, libraries and radiology departments throughout Canada, the United States and overseas. The Journal publishes articles on recent research, new technology and techniques, professional practices, technologists viewpoints as well as relevant book reviews.