{"title":"意大利国家医疗服务体系中的公共与私人访问-使用倾向评分匹配来提供更多关于自愿医疗保险日益普及的见解","authors":"Elenka Brenna","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the Italian NHS, over the last decades, a growing share of population opted for a Voluntary Health Insurance (VHI) in order to privately access healthcare services and bypass the increasingly long waiting times of the public system.</div><div>The study analyses whether and to what extent the presence of a VHI may condition the choice of privately accessing healthcare services. Information on different access fees, specifically “full price”, “copayment price” and “no price”, are furnished for both specialist visits and diagnostic tests; the analysis is focused on these services.</div><div>Data is drawn from the European Health Interview Survey, and is modelled through Propensity Score Matching to find possible differences in the choice of accessing private, rather than public, healthcare services by individuals with VHI.</div><div>Results show a higher likelihood of accessing private specialist (+7.3 %) and diagnostic care (+7.3 %) by patients with a VHI compared to patients without VHI; conversely, having a VHI decreases the probability of seeking NHS care, through copayment, by respectively 5.1 % and 6.3 %. These findings suggest that the spread of VHI may reduce the burden on the NHS and increase the availability of diagnostic and specialist services for patients without integrative coverage.</div><div>On the other side, the analysis shows that income, education and employment status are directly related to the probability of having a VHI, raising concern on possible inequalities across socioeconomic classes in the access to healthcare services. Policy implications are not univocal and claim for a deeper insight into these aspects by both scholars and policymakers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 105271"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public versus private access in the Italian NHS - The use of propensity score matching to provide more insight on the increasing adoption of voluntary health insurance\",\"authors\":\"Elenka Brenna\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105271\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In the Italian NHS, over the last decades, a growing share of population opted for a Voluntary Health Insurance (VHI) in order to privately access healthcare services and bypass the increasingly long waiting times of the public system.</div><div>The study analyses whether and to what extent the presence of a VHI may condition the choice of privately accessing healthcare services. Information on different access fees, specifically “full price”, “copayment price” and “no price”, are furnished for both specialist visits and diagnostic tests; the analysis is focused on these services.</div><div>Data is drawn from the European Health Interview Survey, and is modelled through Propensity Score Matching to find possible differences in the choice of accessing private, rather than public, healthcare services by individuals with VHI.</div><div>Results show a higher likelihood of accessing private specialist (+7.3 %) and diagnostic care (+7.3 %) by patients with a VHI compared to patients without VHI; conversely, having a VHI decreases the probability of seeking NHS care, through copayment, by respectively 5.1 % and 6.3 %. These findings suggest that the spread of VHI may reduce the burden on the NHS and increase the availability of diagnostic and specialist services for patients without integrative coverage.</div><div>On the other side, the analysis shows that income, education and employment status are directly related to the probability of having a VHI, raising concern on possible inequalities across socioeconomic classes in the access to healthcare services. Policy implications are not univocal and claim for a deeper insight into these aspects by both scholars and policymakers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"154 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000272\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025000272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Public versus private access in the Italian NHS - The use of propensity score matching to provide more insight on the increasing adoption of voluntary health insurance
In the Italian NHS, over the last decades, a growing share of population opted for a Voluntary Health Insurance (VHI) in order to privately access healthcare services and bypass the increasingly long waiting times of the public system.
The study analyses whether and to what extent the presence of a VHI may condition the choice of privately accessing healthcare services. Information on different access fees, specifically “full price”, “copayment price” and “no price”, are furnished for both specialist visits and diagnostic tests; the analysis is focused on these services.
Data is drawn from the European Health Interview Survey, and is modelled through Propensity Score Matching to find possible differences in the choice of accessing private, rather than public, healthcare services by individuals with VHI.
Results show a higher likelihood of accessing private specialist (+7.3 %) and diagnostic care (+7.3 %) by patients with a VHI compared to patients without VHI; conversely, having a VHI decreases the probability of seeking NHS care, through copayment, by respectively 5.1 % and 6.3 %. These findings suggest that the spread of VHI may reduce the burden on the NHS and increase the availability of diagnostic and specialist services for patients without integrative coverage.
On the other side, the analysis shows that income, education and employment status are directly related to the probability of having a VHI, raising concern on possible inequalities across socioeconomic classes in the access to healthcare services. Policy implications are not univocal and claim for a deeper insight into these aspects by both scholars and policymakers.
期刊介绍:
Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.