{"title":"机器人辅助经纵隔食管切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌患者的生存结局。","authors":"Koichi Yagi, Susumu Aikou, Shoh Yajima, Masayuki Urabe, Yasuyohi Sato, Yasuhiro Okumura, Takashi Mitsui, Masato Nishida, Yukinori Yamagata, Hiroharu Yamashita, Sachiyo Nomura, Kazuhiko Mori, Yasuyuki Seto","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed a robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy (RATME) to reduce the surgical invasiveness of open transthoracic esophagectomy (oTTE). However, the long-term survival outcomes of patients who undergo RATME remain unclear. Patients who underwent RATME for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between January 2012 and April 2020 were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ESCC cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed according to clinical stage. Survivals were compared between patients who underwent the RATME and oTTE using propensity score matching analysis. One hundred and twenty-seven patients who underwent RATME were included in the analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 96.2 and 92.1% for cStage I RATME group, 84.8 and 82.3% for cStage II, and 61.8 and 61.8% for cStage III, respectively. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 94.3 and 84.3% for cStageI, 71.7 and 69.3% for cStage II, and 5 48.2 and 48.2% for cStage III, respectively. Survival analysis using 74 paired patients showed that the RATME group had better OS and RFS than the oTTE group (p = 0.0028 and p = 0.016, respectively), but equivalent CSS (p = 0.078). The OS of the RATME group stratified by clinical stage was equivalent to that of the comprehensive registry data from Japan, and showed better OS and RFS than the oTTE group, indicating that RATME radicality is guaranteed with regard to long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival outcomes of robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Koichi Yagi, Susumu Aikou, Shoh Yajima, Masayuki Urabe, Yasuyohi Sato, Yasuhiro Okumura, Takashi Mitsui, Masato Nishida, Yukinori Yamagata, Hiroharu Yamashita, Sachiyo Nomura, Kazuhiko Mori, Yasuyuki Seto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doaf007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We developed a robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy (RATME) to reduce the surgical invasiveness of open transthoracic esophagectomy (oTTE). However, the long-term survival outcomes of patients who undergo RATME remain unclear. Patients who underwent RATME for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between January 2012 and April 2020 were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ESCC cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed according to clinical stage. Survivals were compared between patients who underwent the RATME and oTTE using propensity score matching analysis. One hundred and twenty-seven patients who underwent RATME were included in the analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 96.2 and 92.1% for cStage I RATME group, 84.8 and 82.3% for cStage II, and 61.8 and 61.8% for cStage III, respectively. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 94.3 and 84.3% for cStageI, 71.7 and 69.3% for cStage II, and 5 48.2 and 48.2% for cStage III, respectively. Survival analysis using 74 paired patients showed that the RATME group had better OS and RFS than the oTTE group (p = 0.0028 and p = 0.016, respectively), but equivalent CSS (p = 0.078). The OS of the RATME group stratified by clinical stage was equivalent to that of the comprehensive registry data from Japan, and showed better OS and RFS than the oTTE group, indicating that RATME radicality is guaranteed with regard to long-term survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Survival outcomes of robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
We developed a robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy (RATME) to reduce the surgical invasiveness of open transthoracic esophagectomy (oTTE). However, the long-term survival outcomes of patients who undergo RATME remain unclear. Patients who underwent RATME for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between January 2012 and April 2020 were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ESCC cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed according to clinical stage. Survivals were compared between patients who underwent the RATME and oTTE using propensity score matching analysis. One hundred and twenty-seven patients who underwent RATME were included in the analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 96.2 and 92.1% for cStage I RATME group, 84.8 and 82.3% for cStage II, and 61.8 and 61.8% for cStage III, respectively. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 94.3 and 84.3% for cStageI, 71.7 and 69.3% for cStage II, and 5 48.2 and 48.2% for cStage III, respectively. Survival analysis using 74 paired patients showed that the RATME group had better OS and RFS than the oTTE group (p = 0.0028 and p = 0.016, respectively), but equivalent CSS (p = 0.078). The OS of the RATME group stratified by clinical stage was equivalent to that of the comprehensive registry data from Japan, and showed better OS and RFS than the oTTE group, indicating that RATME radicality is guaranteed with regard to long-term survival.