机器人辅助经纵隔食管切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌患者的生存结局。

IF 2.6 3区 医学
Koichi Yagi, Susumu Aikou, Shoh Yajima, Masayuki Urabe, Yasuyohi Sato, Yasuhiro Okumura, Takashi Mitsui, Masato Nishida, Yukinori Yamagata, Hiroharu Yamashita, Sachiyo Nomura, Kazuhiko Mori, Yasuyuki Seto
{"title":"机器人辅助经纵隔食管切除术治疗食管鳞状细胞癌患者的生存结局。","authors":"Koichi Yagi, Susumu Aikou, Shoh Yajima, Masayuki Urabe, Yasuyohi Sato, Yasuhiro Okumura, Takashi Mitsui, Masato Nishida, Yukinori Yamagata, Hiroharu Yamashita, Sachiyo Nomura, Kazuhiko Mori, Yasuyuki Seto","doi":"10.1093/dote/doaf007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We developed a robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy (RATME) to reduce the surgical invasiveness of open transthoracic esophagectomy (oTTE). However, the long-term survival outcomes of patients who undergo RATME remain unclear. Patients who underwent RATME for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between January 2012 and April 2020 were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ESCC cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed according to clinical stage. Survivals were compared between patients who underwent the RATME and oTTE using propensity score matching analysis. One hundred and twenty-seven patients who underwent RATME were included in the analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 96.2 and 92.1% for cStage I RATME group, 84.8 and 82.3% for cStage II, and 61.8 and 61.8% for cStage III, respectively. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 94.3 and 84.3% for cStageI, 71.7 and 69.3% for cStage II, and 5 48.2 and 48.2% for cStage III, respectively. Survival analysis using 74 paired patients showed that the RATME group had better OS and RFS than the oTTE group (p = 0.0028 and p = 0.016, respectively), but equivalent CSS (p = 0.078). The OS of the RATME group stratified by clinical stage was equivalent to that of the comprehensive registry data from Japan, and showed better OS and RFS than the oTTE group, indicating that RATME radicality is guaranteed with regard to long-term survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":54277,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Esophagus","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survival outcomes of robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Koichi Yagi, Susumu Aikou, Shoh Yajima, Masayuki Urabe, Yasuyohi Sato, Yasuhiro Okumura, Takashi Mitsui, Masato Nishida, Yukinori Yamagata, Hiroharu Yamashita, Sachiyo Nomura, Kazuhiko Mori, Yasuyuki Seto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dote/doaf007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We developed a robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy (RATME) to reduce the surgical invasiveness of open transthoracic esophagectomy (oTTE). However, the long-term survival outcomes of patients who undergo RATME remain unclear. Patients who underwent RATME for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between January 2012 and April 2020 were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ESCC cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed according to clinical stage. Survivals were compared between patients who underwent the RATME and oTTE using propensity score matching analysis. One hundred and twenty-seven patients who underwent RATME were included in the analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 96.2 and 92.1% for cStage I RATME group, 84.8 and 82.3% for cStage II, and 61.8 and 61.8% for cStage III, respectively. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 94.3 and 84.3% for cStageI, 71.7 and 69.3% for cStage II, and 5 48.2 and 48.2% for cStage III, respectively. Survival analysis using 74 paired patients showed that the RATME group had better OS and RFS than the oTTE group (p = 0.0028 and p = 0.016, respectively), but equivalent CSS (p = 0.078). The OS of the RATME group stratified by clinical stage was equivalent to that of the comprehensive registry data from Japan, and showed better OS and RFS than the oTTE group, indicating that RATME radicality is guaranteed with regard to long-term survival.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diseases of the Esophagus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf007\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Esophagus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dote/doaf007","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们开发了一种机器人辅助的经纵隔食管切除术(RATME),以减少开放性经胸食管切除术(oTTE)的手术侵入性。然而,接受RATME的患者的长期生存结果仍不清楚。2012年1月至2020年4月期间接受食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC) RATME治疗的患者被纳入研究。根据临床分期分析总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)和ESCC病因特异性生存期(CSS)。采用倾向评分匹配分析比较RATME和oTTE患者的生存率。127例接受RATME的患者被纳入分析。3年和5年的OS率,第一阶段为96.2和92.1%,第二阶段为84.8和82.3%,第三阶段为61.8和61.8%。cStage i的3年和5年RFS分别为94.3和84.3%,cStage II为71.7和69.3%,cStage III为5 48.2和48.2%。74例配对患者的生存分析显示,RATME组的OS和RFS优于oTTE组(分别为p = 0.0028和p = 0.016),但CSS相当(p = 0.078)。按临床分期分层的RATME组的OS与日本综合注册数据相当,并且显示出比oTTE组更好的OS和RFS,表明在长期生存方面,RATME的根治性得到了保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Survival outcomes of robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

We developed a robot-assisted transmediastinal esophagectomy (RATME) to reduce the surgical invasiveness of open transthoracic esophagectomy (oTTE). However, the long-term survival outcomes of patients who undergo RATME remain unclear. Patients who underwent RATME for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) between January 2012 and April 2020 were enrolled. Overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and ESCC cause-specific survival (CSS) were analyzed according to clinical stage. Survivals were compared between patients who underwent the RATME and oTTE using propensity score matching analysis. One hundred and twenty-seven patients who underwent RATME were included in the analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 96.2 and 92.1% for cStage I RATME group, 84.8 and 82.3% for cStage II, and 61.8 and 61.8% for cStage III, respectively. The 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 94.3 and 84.3% for cStageI, 71.7 and 69.3% for cStage II, and 5 48.2 and 48.2% for cStage III, respectively. Survival analysis using 74 paired patients showed that the RATME group had better OS and RFS than the oTTE group (p = 0.0028 and p = 0.016, respectively), but equivalent CSS (p = 0.078). The OS of the RATME group stratified by clinical stage was equivalent to that of the comprehensive registry data from Japan, and showed better OS and RFS than the oTTE group, indicating that RATME radicality is guaranteed with regard to long-term survival.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diseases of the Esophagus
Diseases of the Esophagus Medicine-Gastroenterology
自引率
7.70%
发文量
568
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Esophagus covers all aspects of the esophagus - etiology, investigation and diagnosis, and both medical and surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信