探讨snt -22问卷完成率。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Luv Amin, John Davis, Mishek Thapa, Syeda L Khalil, Arthur W Wu, Thomas S Higgins, Dennis M Tang
{"title":"探讨snt -22问卷完成率。","authors":"Luv Amin, John Davis, Mishek Thapa, Syeda L Khalil, Arthur W Wu, Thomas S Higgins, Dennis M Tang","doi":"10.1177/00034894251320303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, incomplete surveys may impact its predictive utility.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study explores SNOT-22 completion rates, response trends, and potential factors influencing survey omissions aiming to optimize its predictive utility and practical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SNOT-22 surveys were retrospectively collected from patients at various time points throughout their CRS treatment. Surveys with at least one question unanswered were included in the study. Completely unanswered surveys were excluded. Survey response dynamics and trends were analyzed and reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,034 SNOT-22 surveys were collected, 18% of the surveys were incomplete. Questions on \"Ear fullness\" and \"Embarrassed\" were most unanswered, while \"Need to blow nose\" and \"Nasal blockage\" were least unanswered. Questions later in the survey showed a moderate positive correlation with missing responses. Mean scores per question were higher in incomplete than in complete surveys, though differences in SNOT-22 scores between partially and fully completed surveys weren't significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that a large number of SNOT-22 surveys were incomplete, higher than rates reported in similar PROMs. Mean scores did not differ significantly between partial and complete surveys, suggesting interpretation should prioritize individual responses over total scores. Potential barriers to survey completion include question wording, symptom relevance, and survey length. Future research should further investigate survey completion through qualitative methods and randomized question ordering to refine survey design.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"459-462"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Completion Rates of the SNOT-22 Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Luv Amin, John Davis, Mishek Thapa, Syeda L Khalil, Arthur W Wu, Thomas S Higgins, Dennis M Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00034894251320303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, incomplete surveys may impact its predictive utility.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study explores SNOT-22 completion rates, response trends, and potential factors influencing survey omissions aiming to optimize its predictive utility and practical application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SNOT-22 surveys were retrospectively collected from patients at various time points throughout their CRS treatment. Surveys with at least one question unanswered were included in the study. Completely unanswered surveys were excluded. Survey response dynamics and trends were analyzed and reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1,034 SNOT-22 surveys were collected, 18% of the surveys were incomplete. Questions on \\\"Ear fullness\\\" and \\\"Embarrassed\\\" were most unanswered, while \\\"Need to blow nose\\\" and \\\"Nasal blockage\\\" were least unanswered. Questions later in the survey showed a moderate positive correlation with missing responses. Mean scores per question were higher in incomplete than in complete surveys, though differences in SNOT-22 scores between partially and fully completed surveys weren't significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study found that a large number of SNOT-22 surveys were incomplete, higher than rates reported in similar PROMs. Mean scores did not differ significantly between partial and complete surveys, suggesting interpretation should prioritize individual responses over total scores. Potential barriers to survey completion include question wording, symptom relevance, and survey length. Future research should further investigate survey completion through qualitative methods and randomized question ordering to refine survey design.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"459-462\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251320303\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894251320303","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:22项鼻窦炎结局测试(SNOT-22)是一种广泛使用的评估慢性鼻窦炎(CRS)的患者报告结局测量(PROM)。然而,不完整的调查可能会影响其预测效用。目的:本研究旨在探索SNOT-22完成率、响应趋势和影响调查遗漏的潜在因素,以优化其预测效用和实际应用。方法:回顾性收集患者在CRS治疗过程中不同时间点的SNOT-22调查。至少有一个问题没有回答的调查被纳入研究。完全未回答的调查被排除在外。调查响应动态和趋势分析和报告。结果:共收集SNOT-22问卷1034份,不完整问卷占18%。回答最多的是“耳朵丰满”和“尴尬”,回答最少的是“需要擤鼻涕”和“鼻塞”。随后的调查问题显示,缺失的回答与得分呈正相关。不完全问卷的平均得分高于完全问卷,但部分完成问卷和完全完成问卷的SNOT-22得分差异不显著。结论:我们的研究发现大量的SNOT-22调查是不完整的,高于类似PROMs报告的比率。部分调查和完整调查的平均得分没有显著差异,这表明解释应该优先考虑个人反应而不是总分。调查完成的潜在障碍包括问题措辞、症状相关性和调查长度。未来的研究应通过定性方法和随机问题排序来进一步调查调查完成情况,以完善调查设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring Completion Rates of the SNOT-22 Questionnaire.

Background: The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) is a widely used patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for assessing chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, incomplete surveys may impact its predictive utility.

Aims: This study explores SNOT-22 completion rates, response trends, and potential factors influencing survey omissions aiming to optimize its predictive utility and practical application.

Methods: SNOT-22 surveys were retrospectively collected from patients at various time points throughout their CRS treatment. Surveys with at least one question unanswered were included in the study. Completely unanswered surveys were excluded. Survey response dynamics and trends were analyzed and reported.

Results: 1,034 SNOT-22 surveys were collected, 18% of the surveys were incomplete. Questions on "Ear fullness" and "Embarrassed" were most unanswered, while "Need to blow nose" and "Nasal blockage" were least unanswered. Questions later in the survey showed a moderate positive correlation with missing responses. Mean scores per question were higher in incomplete than in complete surveys, though differences in SNOT-22 scores between partially and fully completed surveys weren't significant.

Conclusion: Our study found that a large number of SNOT-22 surveys were incomplete, higher than rates reported in similar PROMs. Mean scores did not differ significantly between partial and complete surveys, suggesting interpretation should prioritize individual responses over total scores. Potential barriers to survey completion include question wording, symptom relevance, and survey length. Future research should further investigate survey completion through qualitative methods and randomized question ordering to refine survey design.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信