建立过敏调节模块,消除电子健康记录中的过敏差异。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Suzanne V Blackley, Ying-Chih Lo, Sheril Varghese, Frank Y Chang, Oliver D James, Diane L Seger, Kimberly G Blumenthal, Foster R Goss, Li Zhou
{"title":"建立过敏调节模块,消除电子健康记录中的过敏差异。","authors":"Suzanne V Blackley, Ying-Chih Lo, Sheril Varghese, Frank Y Chang, Oliver D James, Diane L Seger, Kimberly G Blumenthal, Foster R Goss, Li Zhou","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate, complete allergy histories are critical for decision-making and medication prescription. However, allergy information is often spread across the electronic health record (EHR); thus, allergy lists are often inaccurate or incomplete. Discrepant allergy information can lead to suboptimal or unsafe clinical care and contribute to alert fatigue. We developed an allergy reconciliation module within Mass General Brigham (MGB)'s EHR to support accurate and intuitive reconciliation of discrepancies in the allergy list, thereby enhancing patient safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We combined data-driven methods and knowledge from domain experts to develop 5 mechanisms to compare allergy information across the EHR and designed a user interface to display discrepancies and suggested reconciliation actions, with links to relevant data sources. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to assess the module's performance and measure user acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We implemented and tested the proposed allergy reconciliation mechanisms and module. A comprehensive integration workflow was developed for the module, which was piloted among 111 primary care physicians at MGB. F1 scores of the reconciliation mechanisms range from 0.86 to 1.0. Qualitative analysis showed majority positive feedback from pilot users.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our allergy reconciliation module achieved high performance, and physicians who used it largely accepted its recommendations. However, 56% of the pilot group ultimately did not use the module. User engagement and education are likely needed to increase adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We built a module to automatically identify discrepancies within patients' allergy records and remind providers to reconcile and update the allergy list. Its high accuracy shows promise for enhancing patient safety and utility of drug allergy alerts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Building an allergy reconciliation module to eliminate allergy discrepancies in electronic health records.\",\"authors\":\"Suzanne V Blackley, Ying-Chih Lo, Sheril Varghese, Frank Y Chang, Oliver D James, Diane L Seger, Kimberly G Blumenthal, Foster R Goss, Li Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jamia/ocaf022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Accurate, complete allergy histories are critical for decision-making and medication prescription. However, allergy information is often spread across the electronic health record (EHR); thus, allergy lists are often inaccurate or incomplete. Discrepant allergy information can lead to suboptimal or unsafe clinical care and contribute to alert fatigue. We developed an allergy reconciliation module within Mass General Brigham (MGB)'s EHR to support accurate and intuitive reconciliation of discrepancies in the allergy list, thereby enhancing patient safety.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We combined data-driven methods and knowledge from domain experts to develop 5 mechanisms to compare allergy information across the EHR and designed a user interface to display discrepancies and suggested reconciliation actions, with links to relevant data sources. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to assess the module's performance and measure user acceptance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We implemented and tested the proposed allergy reconciliation mechanisms and module. A comprehensive integration workflow was developed for the module, which was piloted among 111 primary care physicians at MGB. F1 scores of the reconciliation mechanisms range from 0.86 to 1.0. Qualitative analysis showed majority positive feedback from pilot users.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our allergy reconciliation module achieved high performance, and physicians who used it largely accepted its recommendations. However, 56% of the pilot group ultimately did not use the module. User engagement and education are likely needed to increase adoption.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We built a module to automatically identify discrepancies within patients' allergy records and remind providers to reconcile and update the allergy list. Its high accuracy shows promise for enhancing patient safety and utility of drug allergy alerts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50016,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf022\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:准确、完整的过敏史对决策和药物处方至关重要。然而,过敏信息通常是通过电子健康记录(EHR)传播的;因此,过敏清单往往是不准确或不完整的。不一致的过敏信息可能导致不理想或不安全的临床护理,并有助于警惕疲劳。我们在麻省总医院(MGB)的电子病历中开发了过敏调节模块,以支持准确和直观地调节过敏清单中的差异,从而提高患者安全。材料和方法:我们结合数据驱动的方法和领域专家的知识,开发了5种机制来比较整个EHR中的过敏信息,并设计了一个用户界面来显示差异和建议的协调行动,并链接到相关数据源。进行了定性和定量分析,以评估模块的性能和衡量用户的接受程度。结果:我们实现并测试了所提出的过敏调节机制和模块。为该模块开发了一个全面的集成工作流程,并在MGB的111名初级保健医生中进行了试点。调解机制的F1得分在0.86 ~ 1.0之间。定性分析显示,大多数试点用户的反馈是积极的。讨论:我们的过敏调节模块取得了很高的性能,使用它的医生基本上接受了它的建议。然而,56%的试验组最终没有使用该模块。用户参与和教育可能需要提高采用率。结论:我们构建了一个模块,可以自动识别患者过敏记录中的差异,并提醒提供者对过敏记录进行核对和更新。它的高准确性显示了提高患者安全和药物过敏警报效用的希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Building an allergy reconciliation module to eliminate allergy discrepancies in electronic health records.

Objective: Accurate, complete allergy histories are critical for decision-making and medication prescription. However, allergy information is often spread across the electronic health record (EHR); thus, allergy lists are often inaccurate or incomplete. Discrepant allergy information can lead to suboptimal or unsafe clinical care and contribute to alert fatigue. We developed an allergy reconciliation module within Mass General Brigham (MGB)'s EHR to support accurate and intuitive reconciliation of discrepancies in the allergy list, thereby enhancing patient safety.

Materials and methods: We combined data-driven methods and knowledge from domain experts to develop 5 mechanisms to compare allergy information across the EHR and designed a user interface to display discrepancies and suggested reconciliation actions, with links to relevant data sources. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were conducted to assess the module's performance and measure user acceptance.

Results: We implemented and tested the proposed allergy reconciliation mechanisms and module. A comprehensive integration workflow was developed for the module, which was piloted among 111 primary care physicians at MGB. F1 scores of the reconciliation mechanisms range from 0.86 to 1.0. Qualitative analysis showed majority positive feedback from pilot users.

Discussion: Our allergy reconciliation module achieved high performance, and physicians who used it largely accepted its recommendations. However, 56% of the pilot group ultimately did not use the module. User engagement and education are likely needed to increase adoption.

Conclusion: We built a module to automatically identify discrepancies within patients' allergy records and remind providers to reconcile and update the allergy list. Its high accuracy shows promise for enhancing patient safety and utility of drug allergy alerts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信