Bengt A Wiemann, Oliver Beetz, Clara A Weigle, Philipp Tessmer, Simon Störzer, Dennis Kleine-Döpke, Florian W R Vondran, Nicolas Richter, Moritz Schmelzle, Felix Oldhafer
{"title":"肝移植后早期同种异体移植物功能障碍——单中心分析的定义、发生率和相关性。","authors":"Bengt A Wiemann, Oliver Beetz, Clara A Weigle, Philipp Tessmer, Simon Störzer, Dennis Kleine-Döpke, Florian W R Vondran, Nicolas Richter, Moritz Schmelzle, Felix Oldhafer","doi":"10.1007/s00423-025-03633-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) is a serious complication following liver transplantation. With more marginal donors and critical recipients, identifying EAD risk factors and their impact on long-term outcomes is crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed all liver transplants performed between 2007 and 2017 at our institution, excluding pediatric recipients, combined thoracic transplants, and retransplants in the same hospital stay. EAD was defined as either: (i) AST/ALT > 2000 IU/l in first 7 postoperative days (POD), (ii) Bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dl on POD 7, (iii) INR ≥ 1.6 on POD 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 621 cases analyzed, the EAD rate was 53.6%. Multivariate analysis identified only donor-dependent variables as independent risk factors for the onset of EAD: donor age (p = 0.012), donor serum sodium (p = 0.021), cold ischemic time (p = 0.007) and graft weight (p < 0.001). EAD significantly impaired graft survival (69.2% vs. 86.2% after 1 year; p = 0.005) but did not impact long-term patient survival (76.3% vs. 87.6% after 1 year; p = 0.162). Of the EAD components, elevated INR proved to be the only reliable predictor of patient mortality. Additionally, an AST/ALT concentration of > 4000 IU/l significantly improved the predictive value of the EAD definition for patient survival (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EAD risk factors are primarily donor-based and significantly impair graft but not patient survival. The high EAD rates and increased use of marginal grafts suggest the need to adjust conventional EAD definitions to optimize graft allocation in the future.</p>","PeriodicalId":17983,"journal":{"name":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","volume":"410 1","pages":"76"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Allograft Dysfunction after liver transplantation- definition, incidence and relevance in a single-centre analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Bengt A Wiemann, Oliver Beetz, Clara A Weigle, Philipp Tessmer, Simon Störzer, Dennis Kleine-Döpke, Florian W R Vondran, Nicolas Richter, Moritz Schmelzle, Felix Oldhafer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00423-025-03633-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) is a serious complication following liver transplantation. With more marginal donors and critical recipients, identifying EAD risk factors and their impact on long-term outcomes is crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed all liver transplants performed between 2007 and 2017 at our institution, excluding pediatric recipients, combined thoracic transplants, and retransplants in the same hospital stay. EAD was defined as either: (i) AST/ALT > 2000 IU/l in first 7 postoperative days (POD), (ii) Bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dl on POD 7, (iii) INR ≥ 1.6 on POD 7.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 621 cases analyzed, the EAD rate was 53.6%. Multivariate analysis identified only donor-dependent variables as independent risk factors for the onset of EAD: donor age (p = 0.012), donor serum sodium (p = 0.021), cold ischemic time (p = 0.007) and graft weight (p < 0.001). EAD significantly impaired graft survival (69.2% vs. 86.2% after 1 year; p = 0.005) but did not impact long-term patient survival (76.3% vs. 87.6% after 1 year; p = 0.162). Of the EAD components, elevated INR proved to be the only reliable predictor of patient mortality. Additionally, an AST/ALT concentration of > 4000 IU/l significantly improved the predictive value of the EAD definition for patient survival (p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EAD risk factors are primarily donor-based and significantly impair graft but not patient survival. The high EAD rates and increased use of marginal grafts suggest the need to adjust conventional EAD definitions to optimize graft allocation in the future.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"410 1\",\"pages\":\"76\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11839853/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03633-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-025-03633-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:早期同种异体移植物功能障碍(EAD)是肝移植术后的严重并发症。由于有更多的边缘捐助者和关键受援国,确定EAD风险因素及其对长期结果的影响至关重要。方法:我们回顾了2007年至2017年在我院进行的所有肝移植,不包括儿科受体、联合胸腔移植和同一住院期间的再移植。EAD定义为:(i)术后前7天(POD) AST/ALT低于2000 IU/l, (ii) POD 7时胆红素≥10 mg/dl, (iii) POD 7时INR≥1.6。结果:621例病例中,EAD率为53.6%。多因素分析发现,只有供体依赖变量是EAD发病的独立危险因素:供体年龄(p = 0.012)、供体血清钠(p = 0.021)、冷缺血时间(p = 0.007)和移植物重量(p 4000 IU/l)显著提高了EAD定义对患者生存的预测价值(p = 0.002)。结论:EAD的危险因素主要是基于供体的,并显著损害移植物,但不影响患者的生存。高EAD率和边缘移植物使用的增加表明需要调整传统的EAD定义,以优化移植物在未来的分配。
Early Allograft Dysfunction after liver transplantation- definition, incidence and relevance in a single-centre analysis.
Purpose: Early Allograft Dysfunction (EAD) is a serious complication following liver transplantation. With more marginal donors and critical recipients, identifying EAD risk factors and their impact on long-term outcomes is crucial.
Methods: We reviewed all liver transplants performed between 2007 and 2017 at our institution, excluding pediatric recipients, combined thoracic transplants, and retransplants in the same hospital stay. EAD was defined as either: (i) AST/ALT > 2000 IU/l in first 7 postoperative days (POD), (ii) Bilirubin ≥ 10 mg/dl on POD 7, (iii) INR ≥ 1.6 on POD 7.
Results: Of the 621 cases analyzed, the EAD rate was 53.6%. Multivariate analysis identified only donor-dependent variables as independent risk factors for the onset of EAD: donor age (p = 0.012), donor serum sodium (p = 0.021), cold ischemic time (p = 0.007) and graft weight (p < 0.001). EAD significantly impaired graft survival (69.2% vs. 86.2% after 1 year; p = 0.005) but did not impact long-term patient survival (76.3% vs. 87.6% after 1 year; p = 0.162). Of the EAD components, elevated INR proved to be the only reliable predictor of patient mortality. Additionally, an AST/ALT concentration of > 4000 IU/l significantly improved the predictive value of the EAD definition for patient survival (p = 0.002).
Conclusions: EAD risk factors are primarily donor-based and significantly impair graft but not patient survival. The high EAD rates and increased use of marginal grafts suggest the need to adjust conventional EAD definitions to optimize graft allocation in the future.
期刊介绍:
Langenbeck''s Archives of Surgery aims to publish the best results in the field of clinical surgery and basic surgical research. The main focus is on providing the highest level of clinical research and clinically relevant basic research. The journal, published exclusively in English, will provide an international discussion forum for the controlled results of clinical surgery. The majority of published contributions will be original articles reporting on clinical data from general and visceral surgery, while endocrine surgery will also be covered. Papers on basic surgical principles from the fields of traumatology, vascular and thoracic surgery are also welcome. Evidence-based medicine is an important criterion for the acceptance of papers.