乳腺密度教育干预对缺医少药拉美裔患者乳腺x光筛查依从性的有效性:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of women's health Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1089/jwh.2024.0273
Jessica D Austin, Sarah M Jenkins, Vera J Suman, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Bhavika K Patel, Karthik Ghosh, Deborah J Rhodes, Bijan J Borah, Aaron D Norman, Edna P Ramos, Matt Jewett, Crystal R Gonzalez, Valentina Hernandez, Davinder Singh, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Celine M Vachon
{"title":"乳腺密度教育干预对缺医少药拉美裔患者乳腺x光筛查依从性的有效性:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Jessica D Austin, Sarah M Jenkins, Vera J Suman, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Bhavika K Patel, Karthik Ghosh, Deborah J Rhodes, Bijan J Borah, Aaron D Norman, Edna P Ramos, Matt Jewett, Crystal R Gonzalez, Valentina Hernandez, Davinder Singh, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Celine M Vachon","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.0273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Latinas with mammographic dense breasts are at increased risk of breast cancer. This randomized controlled trial tests the effectiveness of three breast density (BD) educational approaches on adherence to subsequent mammography screening among Latinas receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). <b><i>Measure(s):</i></b> Adherence was ascertained using electronic health record and survey responses. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to subsequent mammogram were used to obtain adherence rates at 1- and 2-years post baseline mammogram. Cox modeling assessed whether adherence differed by patient characteristics or group assignment. <b><i>Results:</i></b> This analysis was limited to Latinas enrolled between October 27, 2016, and December 21, 2018 (<i>n</i> = 946; 66.1% <50 years of age, 53.5% with dense breasts). Adherence rates at 1 year was 24.8% increasing to 51.7% by year 2. Latinas randomized to the Promotora + brochure + letter arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09 [95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.87 to 1.36]) or brochure + letter (HR: 1.03 [95% CI 0.82 to 1.29]) arm were not more likely to be adherent to subsequent mammography compared to the letter only arm (<i>p = 0.76)</i>. Adjusting for age and study group, having more prior mammograms, being \"extremely likely\" to get an annual mammogram, and having more confidence to get an annual mammogram at baseline were significant drivers of subsequent adherence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Informational interventions targeting BD education alone are unlikely to significantly improve adherence to subsequent mammography among Latinas receiving care in FQHCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":"491-503"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Breast Density Educational Interventions on Mammography Screening Adherence Among Underserved Latinas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica D Austin, Sarah M Jenkins, Vera J Suman, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Bhavika K Patel, Karthik Ghosh, Deborah J Rhodes, Bijan J Borah, Aaron D Norman, Edna P Ramos, Matt Jewett, Crystal R Gonzalez, Valentina Hernandez, Davinder Singh, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Celine M Vachon\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2024.0273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> Latinas with mammographic dense breasts are at increased risk of breast cancer. This randomized controlled trial tests the effectiveness of three breast density (BD) educational approaches on adherence to subsequent mammography screening among Latinas receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). <b><i>Measure(s):</i></b> Adherence was ascertained using electronic health record and survey responses. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to subsequent mammogram were used to obtain adherence rates at 1- and 2-years post baseline mammogram. Cox modeling assessed whether adherence differed by patient characteristics or group assignment. <b><i>Results:</i></b> This analysis was limited to Latinas enrolled between October 27, 2016, and December 21, 2018 (<i>n</i> = 946; 66.1% <50 years of age, 53.5% with dense breasts). Adherence rates at 1 year was 24.8% increasing to 51.7% by year 2. Latinas randomized to the Promotora + brochure + letter arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09 [95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.87 to 1.36]) or brochure + letter (HR: 1.03 [95% CI 0.82 to 1.29]) arm were not more likely to be adherent to subsequent mammography compared to the letter only arm (<i>p = 0.76)</i>. Adjusting for age and study group, having more prior mammograms, being \\\"extremely likely\\\" to get an annual mammogram, and having more confidence to get an annual mammogram at baseline were significant drivers of subsequent adherence. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Informational interventions targeting BD education alone are unlikely to significantly improve adherence to subsequent mammography among Latinas receiving care in FQHCs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"491-503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0273\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.0273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:拉丁裔乳房密度高的人患乳腺癌的风险增加。本随机对照试验测试了三种乳腺密度(BD)教育方法对在联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)接受护理的拉丁裔患者后续乳房x光检查依从性的有效性。措施:使用电子健康记录和调查回复来确定依从性。使用Kaplan-Meier估计到后续乳房x光检查的时间来获得基线乳房x光检查后1年和2年的依从率。Cox模型评估依从性是否因患者特征或组分配而不同。结果:该分析仅限于2016年10月27日至2018年12月21日期间入组的拉丁裔患者(n = 946;66.1% p = 0.76)。调整年龄和研究组,有更多的乳房x光检查,“极有可能”每年做一次乳房x光检查,以及更有信心在基线时每年做一次乳房x光检查是随后坚持的重要驱动因素。结论:仅针对BD教育的信息干预不太可能显著提高在fqhc接受护理的拉丁裔患者后续乳房x光检查的依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Breast Density Educational Interventions on Mammography Screening Adherence Among Underserved Latinas: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Latinas with mammographic dense breasts are at increased risk of breast cancer. This randomized controlled trial tests the effectiveness of three breast density (BD) educational approaches on adherence to subsequent mammography screening among Latinas receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC). Measure(s): Adherence was ascertained using electronic health record and survey responses. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the time to subsequent mammogram were used to obtain adherence rates at 1- and 2-years post baseline mammogram. Cox modeling assessed whether adherence differed by patient characteristics or group assignment. Results: This analysis was limited to Latinas enrolled between October 27, 2016, and December 21, 2018 (n = 946; 66.1% <50 years of age, 53.5% with dense breasts). Adherence rates at 1 year was 24.8% increasing to 51.7% by year 2. Latinas randomized to the Promotora + brochure + letter arm (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.09 [95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.87 to 1.36]) or brochure + letter (HR: 1.03 [95% CI 0.82 to 1.29]) arm were not more likely to be adherent to subsequent mammography compared to the letter only arm (p = 0.76). Adjusting for age and study group, having more prior mammograms, being "extremely likely" to get an annual mammogram, and having more confidence to get an annual mammogram at baseline were significant drivers of subsequent adherence. Conclusion: Informational interventions targeting BD education alone are unlikely to significantly improve adherence to subsequent mammography among Latinas receiving care in FQHCs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信