针对孕妇阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的 III 型便携式监测设备的诊断性能:前瞻性验证研究

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sofía Romero-Peralta, Miguel Alonso, Olga Mediano, María Cerdà Moncadas, Ainhoa Álvarez Ruiz De Larrinaga, Mercedes Codina Marcet, María Paloma Giménez Carrero, Mónica de la Peña, José Antonio Peña Zarza, Francisco García-Río, Alberto Alonso-Fernández
{"title":"针对孕妇阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的 III 型便携式监测设备的诊断性能:前瞻性验证研究","authors":"Sofía Romero-Peralta, Miguel Alonso, Olga Mediano, María Cerdà Moncadas, Ainhoa Álvarez Ruiz De Larrinaga, Mercedes Codina Marcet, María Paloma Giménez Carrero, Mónica de la Peña, José Antonio Peña Zarza, Francisco García-Río, Alberto Alonso-Fernández","doi":"10.1089/jwh.2024.1033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Rationale:</i></b> Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during pregnancy is linked to negative maternal and neonatal outcomes. Diagnosing OSA in this population is particularly challenging. Portable monitoring devices (PMD) present a potential alternative to polysomnography (PSG), but their effectiveness in pregnant women is uncertain. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of a PMD to detect OSA in pregnant women. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective study of 136 middle-aged pregnant women (34 ± 4 years) in their third trimester of pregnancy (34 ± 3 weeks) who underwent laboratory type III PMD and PSG simultaneously. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Using an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 event/h by PSG, OSA was diagnosed in 10.3% of women (mild OSA: 86%; moderate OSA: 14%). An acceptable positive correlation was found between both tests in the AHI (<i>r</i> = 0.787; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (<i>r</i> = 0.806; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The agreement limits between PSG and type III PMD were -4.1 to 5.4 for AHI and -6.0 to 4.5 for ODI. The sensitivity and specificity of type III PMD for an AHI ≥5 events/h were 57.1% and 99.2%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.9% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.3%. On a receiver operating characteristic curve, the best cutoff point of AHI by type III PMD to identify OSA according to PSG criteria was 2.25 events/h. The sensibility and specificity for this point were 85.7% and 88.5%, respectively, with a PPV of 46.2% and NPV of 98.2%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A type III PMD with an AHI cutoff of 5 events/h could be a good alternative for OSA diagnosis in pregnant women. Additionally, an AHI ≥2.25 event/h demonstrates good diagnostic performance, but its low positive predictive value suggests that it is more appropriate as a screening tool. Further studies are needed to validate this sleep study tool in pregnant women, particularly in home settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17636,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of a Type III Portable Monitoring Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: A Prospective Validation Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sofía Romero-Peralta, Miguel Alonso, Olga Mediano, María Cerdà Moncadas, Ainhoa Álvarez Ruiz De Larrinaga, Mercedes Codina Marcet, María Paloma Giménez Carrero, Mónica de la Peña, José Antonio Peña Zarza, Francisco García-Río, Alberto Alonso-Fernández\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jwh.2024.1033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Rationale:</i></b> Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during pregnancy is linked to negative maternal and neonatal outcomes. Diagnosing OSA in this population is particularly challenging. Portable monitoring devices (PMD) present a potential alternative to polysomnography (PSG), but their effectiveness in pregnant women is uncertain. <b><i>Objective:</i></b> To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of a PMD to detect OSA in pregnant women. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A prospective study of 136 middle-aged pregnant women (34 ± 4 years) in their third trimester of pregnancy (34 ± 3 weeks) who underwent laboratory type III PMD and PSG simultaneously. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Using an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 event/h by PSG, OSA was diagnosed in 10.3% of women (mild OSA: 86%; moderate OSA: 14%). An acceptable positive correlation was found between both tests in the AHI (<i>r</i> = 0.787; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (<i>r</i> = 0.806; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The agreement limits between PSG and type III PMD were -4.1 to 5.4 for AHI and -6.0 to 4.5 for ODI. The sensitivity and specificity of type III PMD for an AHI ≥5 events/h were 57.1% and 99.2%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.9% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.3%. On a receiver operating characteristic curve, the best cutoff point of AHI by type III PMD to identify OSA according to PSG criteria was 2.25 events/h. The sensibility and specificity for this point were 85.7% and 88.5%, respectively, with a PPV of 46.2% and NPV of 98.2%. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> A type III PMD with an AHI cutoff of 5 events/h could be a good alternative for OSA diagnosis in pregnant women. Additionally, an AHI ≥2.25 event/h demonstrates good diagnostic performance, but its low positive predictive value suggests that it is more appropriate as a screening tool. Further studies are needed to validate this sleep study tool in pregnant women, particularly in home settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.1033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2024.1033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理由:怀孕期间的阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与孕产妇和新生儿的负面结局有关。在这一人群中诊断阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停尤其具有挑战性。便携式监测设备(PMD)是多导睡眠描记仪(PSG)的潜在替代品,但其对孕妇的有效性尚不确定。目的:评价PMD对孕妇阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停的诊断准确性。方法:对136例妊娠晚期(34±3周)同时行实验室III型PMD和PSG检查的中年孕妇(34±4岁)进行前瞻性研究。结果:采用PSG检测呼吸暂停低通气指数(AHI)≥5事件/小时,10.3%的女性诊断为OSA(轻度OSA: 86%;中度OSA: 14%)。两项检测在AHI中均存在可接受的正相关(r = 0.787;p < 0.001)和氧去饱和指数(ODI) (r = 0.806;P < 0.001)。PSG和III型PMD之间的协议限制为AHI -4.1 ~ 5.4, ODI -6.0 ~ 4.5。ⅲ型PMD对AHI≥5事件/h的敏感性和特异性分别为57.1%和99.2%,阳性预测值(PPV)为88.9%,阴性预测值(NPV)为95.3%。在受试者工作特征曲线上,根据PSG标准,III型PMD诊断OSA的最佳AHI截断点为2.25事件/小时。该点的敏感性为85.7%,特异性为88.5%,PPV为46.2%,NPV为98.2%。结论:AHI截止值为5个事件/小时的III型PMD可能是孕妇OSA诊断的一个很好的选择。此外,AHI≥2.25事件/小时具有良好的诊断性能,但其较低的阳性预测值表明其更适合作为筛查工具。需要进一步的研究来验证孕妇的睡眠研究工具,特别是在家庭环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Performance of a Type III Portable Monitoring Device for Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Pregnant Women: A Prospective Validation Study.

Rationale: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) during pregnancy is linked to negative maternal and neonatal outcomes. Diagnosing OSA in this population is particularly challenging. Portable monitoring devices (PMD) present a potential alternative to polysomnography (PSG), but their effectiveness in pregnant women is uncertain. Objective: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of a PMD to detect OSA in pregnant women. Methods: A prospective study of 136 middle-aged pregnant women (34 ± 4 years) in their third trimester of pregnancy (34 ± 3 weeks) who underwent laboratory type III PMD and PSG simultaneously. Results: Using an apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 event/h by PSG, OSA was diagnosed in 10.3% of women (mild OSA: 86%; moderate OSA: 14%). An acceptable positive correlation was found between both tests in the AHI (r = 0.787; p < 0.001) and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (r = 0.806; p < 0.001). The agreement limits between PSG and type III PMD were -4.1 to 5.4 for AHI and -6.0 to 4.5 for ODI. The sensitivity and specificity of type III PMD for an AHI ≥5 events/h were 57.1% and 99.2%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 88.9% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.3%. On a receiver operating characteristic curve, the best cutoff point of AHI by type III PMD to identify OSA according to PSG criteria was 2.25 events/h. The sensibility and specificity for this point were 85.7% and 88.5%, respectively, with a PPV of 46.2% and NPV of 98.2%. Conclusions: A type III PMD with an AHI cutoff of 5 events/h could be a good alternative for OSA diagnosis in pregnant women. Additionally, an AHI ≥2.25 event/h demonstrates good diagnostic performance, but its low positive predictive value suggests that it is more appropriate as a screening tool. Further studies are needed to validate this sleep study tool in pregnant women, particularly in home settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of women's health
Journal of women's health 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
197
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Women''s Health is the primary source of information for meeting the challenges of providing optimal health care for women throughout their lifespan. The Journal delivers cutting-edge advancements in diagnostic procedures, therapeutic protocols for the management of diseases, and innovative research in gender-based biology that impacts patient care and treatment. Journal of Women’s Health coverage includes: -Internal Medicine Endocrinology- Cardiology- Oncology- Obstetrics/Gynecology- Urogynecology- Psychiatry- Neurology- Nutrition- Sex-Based Biology- Complementary Medicine- Sports Medicine- Surgery- Medical Education- Public Policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信