预测糖尿病自我管理教育参与:机器学习算法和模型。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Xiangxiang Jiang, Gang Lv, Minghui Li, Jing Yuan, Z Kevin Lu
{"title":"预测糖尿病自我管理教育参与:机器学习算法和模型。","authors":"Xiangxiang Jiang, Gang Lv, Minghui Li, Jing Yuan, Z Kevin Lu","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is endorsed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as an essential component of diabetes management. However, the utilization of DSME remains limited in the USA. This study aimed to investigate current DSME participation among the older population and to identify comprehensive factors of DSME engagement through employing various machine learning (ML) models based on a US nationally representative survey linked to claims data.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey were employed, and this study included data on US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes from 2017 to 2019. Comprehensive variables following the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework were employed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with DSME using five common ML approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, 37.94% of participants received DSME after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 95 variables were used and all ML models achieved accuracy scores exceeding 70%. Random forest had better predictive performance, with an accuracy of 85%. Seventy-four of 95 variables were identified as key variables. Racial/ethnic disparities in predictors for DSME were identified in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified comprehensive and critical factors associated with DSME engagement from biological, behavioral, sociocultural, and environmental domains using different ML models, as well as related racial/ethnic disparities. Aligning these findings with the DSME National Standards from the ADA would enhance the guidelines' effectiveness, promoting tailored and equal diabetes management approaches that cater to diverse races/ethnicities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836835/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting diabetes self-management education engagement: machine learning algorithms and models.\",\"authors\":\"Xiangxiang Jiang, Gang Lv, Minghui Li, Jing Yuan, Z Kevin Lu\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is endorsed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as an essential component of diabetes management. However, the utilization of DSME remains limited in the USA. This study aimed to investigate current DSME participation among the older population and to identify comprehensive factors of DSME engagement through employing various machine learning (ML) models based on a US nationally representative survey linked to claims data.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey were employed, and this study included data on US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes from 2017 to 2019. Comprehensive variables following the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework were employed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with DSME using five common ML approaches.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In our study, 37.94% of participants received DSME after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 95 variables were used and all ML models achieved accuracy scores exceeding 70%. Random forest had better predictive performance, with an accuracy of 85%. Seventy-four of 95 variables were identified as key variables. Racial/ethnic disparities in predictors for DSME were identified in this study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified comprehensive and critical factors associated with DSME engagement from biological, behavioral, sociocultural, and environmental domains using different ML models, as well as related racial/ethnic disparities. Aligning these findings with the DSME National Standards from the ADA would enhance the guidelines' effectiveness, promoting tailored and equal diabetes management approaches that cater to diverse races/ethnicities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836835/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004632\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004632","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)被美国糖尿病协会(ADA)认可为糖尿病管理的重要组成部分。然而,DSME在美国的应用仍然有限。本研究旨在调查当前老年人口参与DSME的情况,并通过采用基于与索赔数据相关的美国全国代表性调查的各种机器学习(ML)模型,确定DSME参与的综合因素。研究设计和方法:采用医疗保险现行受益人调查的数据,本研究包括2017年至2019年美国医疗保险糖尿病受益人的数据。采用国家老龄健康差异研究框架研究所的综合变量,以确保使用五种常见的ML方法对与DSME相关的因素进行综合评估。结果:在我们的研究中,应用纳入和排除标准后,37.94%的参与者获得了DSME。总共使用了95个变量,所有ML模型的准确率得分都超过了70%。随机森林具有更好的预测性能,准确率为85%。95个变量中的74个被确定为关键变量。本研究确定了DSME预测因素的种族/民族差异。结论:本研究使用不同的机器学习模型,从生物、行为、社会文化和环境领域,以及相关的种族/民族差异,确定了与DSME参与相关的综合和关键因素。将这些发现与ADA的DSME国家标准相结合,将提高指南的有效性,促进适应不同种族/民族的量身定制和平等的糖尿病管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting diabetes self-management education engagement: machine learning algorithms and models.

Introduction: Diabetes self-management education (DSME) is endorsed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) as an essential component of diabetes management. However, the utilization of DSME remains limited in the USA. This study aimed to investigate current DSME participation among the older population and to identify comprehensive factors of DSME engagement through employing various machine learning (ML) models based on a US nationally representative survey linked to claims data.

Research design and methods: Data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey were employed, and this study included data on US Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes from 2017 to 2019. Comprehensive variables following the National Institute on Aging Health Disparities Research Framework were employed to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of factors associated with DSME using five common ML approaches.

Results: In our study, 37.94% of participants received DSME after the application of inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 95 variables were used and all ML models achieved accuracy scores exceeding 70%. Random forest had better predictive performance, with an accuracy of 85%. Seventy-four of 95 variables were identified as key variables. Racial/ethnic disparities in predictors for DSME were identified in this study.

Conclusions: This study identified comprehensive and critical factors associated with DSME engagement from biological, behavioral, sociocultural, and environmental domains using different ML models, as well as related racial/ethnic disparities. Aligning these findings with the DSME National Standards from the ADA would enhance the guidelines' effectiveness, promoting tailored and equal diabetes management approaches that cater to diverse races/ethnicities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信