转到私人药房的公共病人:印度奥里萨邦病人、设施和药房的数据分析。

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Annie Haakenstad, Anuska Kalita, Bijetri Bose, Arpita Chakraborty, Kirti Gupta, Sian Hsiang-Te Tsuei, Liana Rosenkrantz Woskie, Winnie Yip
{"title":"转到私人药房的公共病人:印度奥里萨邦病人、设施和药房的数据分析。","authors":"Annie Haakenstad, Anuska Kalita, Bijetri Bose, Arpita Chakraborty, Kirti Gupta, Sian Hsiang-Te Tsuei, Liana Rosenkrantz Woskie, Winnie Yip","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In India, public sector patients purchase drugs from private pharmacies instead of obtaining them for free from public pharmacies-a phenomenon we call public patient forwarding to private pharmacies. This behaviour results in substantial financial hardship. We examine whether low public drug stocks, patient preferences for private drugs or the presence of private pharmacies nearby explain this behaviour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected cross-sectional data from 7567 households, 523 health facilities and 1036 private pharmacies in Odisha, India. We linked 917 outpatient visits to facilities based on patient reports and linked public facilities to the nearest private pharmacy using Global Positioning System coordinates. We used ordinary least squares regression to assess whether the behaviour of facilities and patients was associated with drug stocks and pharmacy proximity, and whether patient satisfaction was associated with private drug purchases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among public patients prescribed drugs, more than 70% purchased private drugs. In hospitals, for each 10% increase in drug stocks, 4.8% fewer patients purchased private drugs (p=0.047). In primary facilities, the same share of patients purchased private drugs across stock levels. Regardless of facility level, when more than 75% of drugs were in stock, 60% or more of patients still obtained drugs from the private sector. Patients were more likely to purchase private drugs when private pharmacies were near public facilities, but were not more satisfied with their visit when they obtained private drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that private pharmacies are both secondary and complementary suppliers of drugs for hospitals, but may act more like substitutes for primary facilities, consistent with evidence that private pharmacies provide advice and other services akin to primary care in Odisha. Improving public facility drug stocks alone is unlikely to fully address drug-driven financial hardship in India. Provider prescribing practices should be investigated to identify additional policy options.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836861/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public patient forwarding to private pharmacies: an analysis of data linking patients, facilities and pharmacies in the state of Odisha, India.\",\"authors\":\"Annie Haakenstad, Anuska Kalita, Bijetri Bose, Arpita Chakraborty, Kirti Gupta, Sian Hsiang-Te Tsuei, Liana Rosenkrantz Woskie, Winnie Yip\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In India, public sector patients purchase drugs from private pharmacies instead of obtaining them for free from public pharmacies-a phenomenon we call public patient forwarding to private pharmacies. This behaviour results in substantial financial hardship. We examine whether low public drug stocks, patient preferences for private drugs or the presence of private pharmacies nearby explain this behaviour.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected cross-sectional data from 7567 households, 523 health facilities and 1036 private pharmacies in Odisha, India. We linked 917 outpatient visits to facilities based on patient reports and linked public facilities to the nearest private pharmacy using Global Positioning System coordinates. We used ordinary least squares regression to assess whether the behaviour of facilities and patients was associated with drug stocks and pharmacy proximity, and whether patient satisfaction was associated with private drug purchases.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among public patients prescribed drugs, more than 70% purchased private drugs. In hospitals, for each 10% increase in drug stocks, 4.8% fewer patients purchased private drugs (p=0.047). In primary facilities, the same share of patients purchased private drugs across stock levels. Regardless of facility level, when more than 75% of drugs were in stock, 60% or more of patients still obtained drugs from the private sector. Patients were more likely to purchase private drugs when private pharmacies were near public facilities, but were not more satisfied with their visit when they obtained private drugs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results suggest that private pharmacies are both secondary and complementary suppliers of drugs for hospitals, but may act more like substitutes for primary facilities, consistent with evidence that private pharmacies provide advice and other services akin to primary care in Odisha. Improving public facility drug stocks alone is unlikely to fully address drug-driven financial hardship in India. Provider prescribing practices should be investigated to identify additional policy options.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836861/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017788\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:在印度,公共部门的病人从私人药房购买药品,而不是从公共药房免费获得药品——我们称之为公共病人转到私人药房的现象。这种行为导致严重的经济困难。我们研究了公共药品库存低、患者对私人药品的偏好或附近私人药店的存在是否解释了这种行为。方法:我们收集了印度奥里萨邦7567户家庭、523家卫生机构和1036家私人药房的横断面数据。我们根据患者报告将917次门诊就诊与医疗机构联系起来,并使用全球定位系统坐标将公共设施与最近的私人药房联系起来。我们使用普通最小二乘回归来评估设施和患者的行为是否与药品库存和药房邻近有关,以及患者满意度是否与私人药品购买有关。结果:公办用药患者中,购买私办药品的占70%以上。在医院,药品库存每增加10%,购买私人药品的患者减少4.8% (p=0.047)。在初级医疗机构,不同库存水平的患者购买私人药品的比例相同。无论设施水平如何,当75%以上的药物有库存时,60%或更多的患者仍然从私营部门获得药物。当私人药房靠近公共设施时,患者更倾向于购买私人药品,而当获得私人药品时,患者的就诊满意度并不高。结论:结果表明,私人药房既是医院的二级和补充药品供应商,但可能更像是初级设施的替代品,这与奥里萨邦私人药房提供类似初级保健的咨询和其他服务的证据是一致的。仅靠改善公共设施药品库存不太可能完全解决印度由药品造成的财政困难。应调查提供者开处方的做法,以确定其他政策选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public patient forwarding to private pharmacies: an analysis of data linking patients, facilities and pharmacies in the state of Odisha, India.

Introduction: In India, public sector patients purchase drugs from private pharmacies instead of obtaining them for free from public pharmacies-a phenomenon we call public patient forwarding to private pharmacies. This behaviour results in substantial financial hardship. We examine whether low public drug stocks, patient preferences for private drugs or the presence of private pharmacies nearby explain this behaviour.

Methods: We collected cross-sectional data from 7567 households, 523 health facilities and 1036 private pharmacies in Odisha, India. We linked 917 outpatient visits to facilities based on patient reports and linked public facilities to the nearest private pharmacy using Global Positioning System coordinates. We used ordinary least squares regression to assess whether the behaviour of facilities and patients was associated with drug stocks and pharmacy proximity, and whether patient satisfaction was associated with private drug purchases.

Results: Among public patients prescribed drugs, more than 70% purchased private drugs. In hospitals, for each 10% increase in drug stocks, 4.8% fewer patients purchased private drugs (p=0.047). In primary facilities, the same share of patients purchased private drugs across stock levels. Regardless of facility level, when more than 75% of drugs were in stock, 60% or more of patients still obtained drugs from the private sector. Patients were more likely to purchase private drugs when private pharmacies were near public facilities, but were not more satisfied with their visit when they obtained private drugs.

Conclusion: The results suggest that private pharmacies are both secondary and complementary suppliers of drugs for hospitals, but may act more like substitutes for primary facilities, consistent with evidence that private pharmacies provide advice and other services akin to primary care in Odisha. Improving public facility drug stocks alone is unlikely to fully address drug-driven financial hardship in India. Provider prescribing practices should be investigated to identify additional policy options.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信