心理康复对手术结果的影响:一项荟萃分析和荟萃回归。

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Annals of surgery Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1097/SLA.0000000000006677
Anne E Hall, Nghiem H Nguyen, Catherine T Cascavita, Kaavian Shariati, Archi K Patel, Wei Chen, Youngnam Kang, Xiaoyan Ren, Chi-Hong Tseng, Marco A Hidalgo, Justine C Lee
{"title":"心理康复对手术结果的影响:一项荟萃分析和荟萃回归。","authors":"Anne E Hall, Nghiem H Nguyen, Catherine T Cascavita, Kaavian Shariati, Archi K Patel, Wei Chen, Youngnam Kang, Xiaoyan Ren, Chi-Hong Tseng, Marco A Hidalgo, Justine C Lee","doi":"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of psychological prehabilitation in improving surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation aims to improve surgical outcomes through prevention. While most prehabilitation protocols have focused on improving patient knowledge and physical function, mental health has started to receive greater attention due to its effects on postoperative recovery, including persistent opioid use. However, the efficacy of psychological prehabilitation remains unclear due to the heterogeneity of psychological modalities, intervention characteristics, and surgical contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials from 2004 to 2024 were conducted per \"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses\" guidelines to assess the effect of psychotherapy on 4 postoperative outcomes: length of stay (LOS), pain, anxiety, and depression. Randomized controlled trials were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases (March 2024). Studies with >50 adult surgical patients were included. Random effect meta-analyses estimated pooled effect sizes, with meta-regression analyzing intervention and surgery types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty articles comprising 2376 patients were included. Psychological prehabilitation interventions included cognitive behavioral therapy (70%), supportive psychotherapy (25%), and acceptance and commitment therapy (5%). Pooled analysis revealed greater reductions in LOS [mean difference (MD) = -1.62 days; 95% CI: -2.899, -0.349; P = 0.012], pain (MD = -3.52; 95% CI: -2.642, -4.401; P < 0.001), anxiety (standard MD = -1.51; 95% CI: -0.634, -2.385; P < 0.001), and depression (standard MD = -1.48; 95% CI: -0.578, -2.382; P = 0.001). Psychotherapy modality and surgery type showed no significant effects, except for anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychological prehabilitation reduces LOS, pain, anxiety, and depression after surgery. Further studies are necessary to compare different types, durations, and delivery methods of psychotherapy for specific postoperative outcomes of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":8017,"journal":{"name":"Annals of surgery","volume":" ","pages":"928-941"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Psychological Prehabilitation on Surgical Outcomes: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.\",\"authors\":\"Anne E Hall, Nghiem H Nguyen, Catherine T Cascavita, Kaavian Shariati, Archi K Patel, Wei Chen, Youngnam Kang, Xiaoyan Ren, Chi-Hong Tseng, Marco A Hidalgo, Justine C Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SLA.0000000000006677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of psychological prehabilitation in improving surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation aims to improve surgical outcomes through prevention. While most prehabilitation protocols have focused on improving patient knowledge and physical function, mental health has started to receive greater attention due to its effects on postoperative recovery, including persistent opioid use. However, the efficacy of psychological prehabilitation remains unclear due to the heterogeneity of psychological modalities, intervention characteristics, and surgical contexts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials from 2004 to 2024 were conducted per \\\"Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses\\\" guidelines to assess the effect of psychotherapy on 4 postoperative outcomes: length of stay (LOS), pain, anxiety, and depression. Randomized controlled trials were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases (March 2024). Studies with >50 adult surgical patients were included. Random effect meta-analyses estimated pooled effect sizes, with meta-regression analyzing intervention and surgery types.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty articles comprising 2376 patients were included. Psychological prehabilitation interventions included cognitive behavioral therapy (70%), supportive psychotherapy (25%), and acceptance and commitment therapy (5%). Pooled analysis revealed greater reductions in LOS [mean difference (MD) = -1.62 days; 95% CI: -2.899, -0.349; P = 0.012], pain (MD = -3.52; 95% CI: -2.642, -4.401; P < 0.001), anxiety (standard MD = -1.51; 95% CI: -0.634, -2.385; P < 0.001), and depression (standard MD = -1.48; 95% CI: -0.578, -2.382; P = 0.001). Psychotherapy modality and surgery type showed no significant effects, except for anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychological prehabilitation reduces LOS, pain, anxiety, and depression after surgery. Further studies are necessary to compare different types, durations, and delivery methods of psychotherapy for specific postoperative outcomes of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"928-941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006677\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000006677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨心理康复对改善手术效果的作用。摘要背景资料:预康复旨在通过预防改善手术效果。虽然大多数康复方案侧重于提高患者的知识和身体功能,但由于其对术后恢复的影响,包括持续使用阿片类药物,心理健康已开始受到更多关注。然而,由于心理方式、干预特征和手术环境的异质性,心理康复的疗效尚不清楚。方法:根据PRISMA指南,对2004-2024年的随机对照试验(rct)进行系统回顾、荟萃分析和荟萃回归,评估心理治疗对术后四项预后的影响:住院时间(LOS)、疼痛、焦虑和抑郁。随机对照试验检索自MEDLINE、EMBASE、CENTRAL和谷歌Scholar数据库(2024年3月)。研究纳入了50例成人外科患者。随机效应荟萃分析估计了合并效应大小,并用荟萃回归分析了干预措施和手术类型。结果:纳入文献20篇,患者2376例。心理康复干预包括认知行为治疗(70%)、支持性心理治疗(25%)和接受与承诺治疗(5%)。综合分析显示,术后LOS (Mean Difference (MD)=-1.62天,95%CI: -2.899,-0.349, P=0.012)和疼痛(MD=-3.52, 95%CI: -2.642,-4.401, P)的降低幅度更大。结论:心理康复可减少术后LOS、疼痛、焦虑和抑郁。需要进一步的研究来比较不同类型、持续时间和递送方法的心理治疗对特定的术后结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Psychological Prehabilitation on Surgical Outcomes: A Meta-analysis and Meta-regression.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of psychological prehabilitation in improving surgical outcomes.

Background: Prehabilitation aims to improve surgical outcomes through prevention. While most prehabilitation protocols have focused on improving patient knowledge and physical function, mental health has started to receive greater attention due to its effects on postoperative recovery, including persistent opioid use. However, the efficacy of psychological prehabilitation remains unclear due to the heterogeneity of psychological modalities, intervention characteristics, and surgical contexts.

Methods: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of randomized controlled trials from 2004 to 2024 were conducted per "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" guidelines to assess the effect of psychotherapy on 4 postoperative outcomes: length of stay (LOS), pain, anxiety, and depression. Randomized controlled trials were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases (March 2024). Studies with >50 adult surgical patients were included. Random effect meta-analyses estimated pooled effect sizes, with meta-regression analyzing intervention and surgery types.

Results: Twenty articles comprising 2376 patients were included. Psychological prehabilitation interventions included cognitive behavioral therapy (70%), supportive psychotherapy (25%), and acceptance and commitment therapy (5%). Pooled analysis revealed greater reductions in LOS [mean difference (MD) = -1.62 days; 95% CI: -2.899, -0.349; P = 0.012], pain (MD = -3.52; 95% CI: -2.642, -4.401; P < 0.001), anxiety (standard MD = -1.51; 95% CI: -0.634, -2.385; P < 0.001), and depression (standard MD = -1.48; 95% CI: -0.578, -2.382; P = 0.001). Psychotherapy modality and surgery type showed no significant effects, except for anxiety.

Conclusions: Psychological prehabilitation reduces LOS, pain, anxiety, and depression after surgery. Further studies are necessary to compare different types, durations, and delivery methods of psychotherapy for specific postoperative outcomes of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of surgery
Annals of surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
4.40%
发文量
687
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgery is a renowned surgery journal, recognized globally for its extensive scholarly references. It serves as a valuable resource for the international medical community by disseminating knowledge regarding important developments in surgical science and practice. Surgeons regularly turn to the Annals of Surgery to stay updated on innovative practices and techniques. The journal also offers special editorial features such as "Advances in Surgical Technique," offering timely coverage of ongoing clinical issues. Additionally, the journal publishes monthly review articles that address the latest concerns in surgical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信