在尼泊尔肿瘤学家中选择临床实践指南的财务利益冲突意识:一项横断面研究

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Rajeev Shrestha, Akihiko Ozaki, Hiroaki Saito, Masaharu Tsubokura, Tetsuya Tanimoto, Bikal Ghimire, Yogendra Prasad Singh, Simit Sapkota, Sunil Shrestha
{"title":"在尼泊尔肿瘤学家中选择临床实践指南的财务利益冲突意识:一项横断面研究","authors":"Rajeev Shrestha,&nbsp;Akihiko Ozaki,&nbsp;Hiroaki Saito,&nbsp;Masaharu Tsubokura,&nbsp;Tetsuya Tanimoto,&nbsp;Bikal Ghimire,&nbsp;Yogendra Prasad Singh,&nbsp;Simit Sapkota,&nbsp;Sunil Shrestha","doi":"10.1111/jep.70034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) between pharmaceutical companies and clinical practice guideline (CPG) authors can influence guideline recommendations, posing challenges to patient care. Despite global concerns, limited research exists on FCOI awareness among healthcare professionals in lower-middle-income countries like Nepal.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study, conducted between June 2020 and January 2021, aimed to assess FCOI awareness among Nepalese oncologists and identify associated factors. Data were collected through an online survey of 102 oncologists selected from three medical societies. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the participants, 64 (63%) considered FCOIs between pharmaceutical companies and CPG authors when implementing guidelines. Significant associations were found between FCOI consideration and three factors: type of CPGs used, with higher consideration among users of national (80%) and international guidelines (69%) compared with local guidelines (44%) (<i>p</i> = 0.04); place of medical education, with higher consideration among Nepal-trained physicians (77%) compared with those trained abroad (61%) or both (44%) (<i>p</i> = 0.012); and experience in cancer field, with higher consideration among those with less than 10 years of experience (75%) compared with those having 10-20 years (49%) or more than 20 years (63%) of experience (<i>p</i> = 0.033).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>While nearly two-thirds of Nepalese oncologists consider FCOIs when implementing CPGs, enhancing awareness among the remaining one-third is crucial. The findings suggest the need for targeted educational programs and stronger FCOI disclosure mechanisms, particularly as Nepal develops its own CPGs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15997,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Awareness of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Selecting Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Nepalese Oncologists: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Rajeev Shrestha,&nbsp;Akihiko Ozaki,&nbsp;Hiroaki Saito,&nbsp;Masaharu Tsubokura,&nbsp;Tetsuya Tanimoto,&nbsp;Bikal Ghimire,&nbsp;Yogendra Prasad Singh,&nbsp;Simit Sapkota,&nbsp;Sunil Shrestha\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jep.70034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) between pharmaceutical companies and clinical practice guideline (CPG) authors can influence guideline recommendations, posing challenges to patient care. Despite global concerns, limited research exists on FCOI awareness among healthcare professionals in lower-middle-income countries like Nepal.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This cross-sectional study, conducted between June 2020 and January 2021, aimed to assess FCOI awareness among Nepalese oncologists and identify associated factors. Data were collected through an online survey of 102 oncologists selected from three medical societies. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Of the participants, 64 (63%) considered FCOIs between pharmaceutical companies and CPG authors when implementing guidelines. Significant associations were found between FCOI consideration and three factors: type of CPGs used, with higher consideration among users of national (80%) and international guidelines (69%) compared with local guidelines (44%) (<i>p</i> = 0.04); place of medical education, with higher consideration among Nepal-trained physicians (77%) compared with those trained abroad (61%) or both (44%) (<i>p</i> = 0.012); and experience in cancer field, with higher consideration among those with less than 10 years of experience (75%) compared with those having 10-20 years (49%) or more than 20 years (63%) of experience (<i>p</i> = 0.033).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>While nearly two-thirds of Nepalese oncologists consider FCOIs when implementing CPGs, enhancing awareness among the remaining one-third is crucial. The findings suggest the need for targeted educational programs and stronger FCOI disclosure mechanisms, particularly as Nepal develops its own CPGs.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70034\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evaluation in clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jep.70034","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

制药公司和临床实践指南(CPG)作者之间的经济利益冲突(FCOIs)会影响指南的推荐,给患者护理带来挑战。尽管受到全球关注,但在尼泊尔等中低收入国家的医疗保健专业人员中,关于FCOI意识的研究有限。方法本横断面研究于2020年6月至2021年1月进行,旨在评估尼泊尔肿瘤学家对FCOI的认识并确定相关因素。数据是通过对来自三个医学协会的102名肿瘤学家进行在线调查收集的。使用描述性统计和Fisher精确检验进行分析。结果64位(63%)的参与者在实施指南时考虑了制药公司和CPG作者之间的fcoi。FCOI考虑与三个因素之间存在显著关联:使用cpg的类型,与地方指南(44%)相比,国家指南(80%)和国际指南(69%)用户的考虑程度更高(p = 0.04);医学教育的地点,在尼泊尔受训的医生(77%)比在国外受训的医生(61%)或两者(44%)考虑得更多(p = 0.012);在癌症领域工作经验方面,工作经验少于10年(75%)的人比工作经验10-20年(49%)或20年以上(63%)的人更受重视(p = 0.033)。尽管近三分之二的尼泊尔肿瘤学家在实施CPGs时会考虑FCOIs,但提高其余三分之一的认识至关重要。研究结果表明,需要有针对性的教育项目和更强有力的FCOI披露机制,特别是在尼泊尔开发自己的CPGs的情况下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Awareness of Financial Conflicts of Interest in Selecting Clinical Practice Guidelines Among Nepalese Oncologists: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background

Financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs) between pharmaceutical companies and clinical practice guideline (CPG) authors can influence guideline recommendations, posing challenges to patient care. Despite global concerns, limited research exists on FCOI awareness among healthcare professionals in lower-middle-income countries like Nepal.

Methods

This cross-sectional study, conducted between June 2020 and January 2021, aimed to assess FCOI awareness among Nepalese oncologists and identify associated factors. Data were collected through an online survey of 102 oncologists selected from three medical societies. Descriptive statistics and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis.

Results

Of the participants, 64 (63%) considered FCOIs between pharmaceutical companies and CPG authors when implementing guidelines. Significant associations were found between FCOI consideration and three factors: type of CPGs used, with higher consideration among users of national (80%) and international guidelines (69%) compared with local guidelines (44%) (p = 0.04); place of medical education, with higher consideration among Nepal-trained physicians (77%) compared with those trained abroad (61%) or both (44%) (p = 0.012); and experience in cancer field, with higher consideration among those with less than 10 years of experience (75%) compared with those having 10-20 years (49%) or more than 20 years (63%) of experience (p = 0.033).

Conclusion

While nearly two-thirds of Nepalese oncologists consider FCOIs when implementing CPGs, enhancing awareness among the remaining one-third is crucial. The findings suggest the need for targeted educational programs and stronger FCOI disclosure mechanisms, particularly as Nepal develops its own CPGs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice aims to promote the evaluation and development of clinical practice across medicine, nursing and the allied health professions. All aspects of health services research and public health policy analysis and debate are of interest to the Journal whether studied from a population-based or individual patient-centred perspective. Of particular interest to the Journal are submissions on all aspects of clinical effectiveness and efficiency including evidence-based medicine, clinical practice guidelines, clinical decision making, clinical services organisation, implementation and delivery, health economic evaluation, health process and outcome measurement and new or improved methods (conceptual and statistical) for systematic inquiry into clinical practice. Papers may take a classical quantitative or qualitative approach to investigation (or may utilise both techniques) or may take the form of learned essays, structured/systematic reviews and critiques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信