Wieneke Penninga, Alexander H. C. Hendriks, Hedwig J. A. van Bakel, Petri J. C. M. Embregts
{"title":"深度智障人士在与支持人员互动过程中行为主动性的前驱:一项探索性的微观分析","authors":"Wieneke Penninga, Alexander H. C. Hendriks, Hedwig J. A. van Bakel, Petri J. C. M. Embregts","doi":"10.1111/bld.12622","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Initiating meaningful moments of interaction with people with profound intellectual disabilities can prove to be difficult for support staff. Exploring the behaviour of support staff that precedes the initiations of behaviour by people with profound intellectual disabilities helps to shed light upon the potential facilitating effects of staff behaviour.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Three meaningful moments of interaction between support staff and people with profound intellectual disabilities that were recorded were then microanalytically coded, along with the initial onset of these moments. Each behaviour initiated by people with profound intellectual disabilities was examined to see what specific behaviour by the support staff began precedingly.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The most frequently displayed ‘staff–client’ behavioural sequences were ‘looking’, ‘moving with head’, ‘moving with arms’ or ‘vocalisation’ of support staff followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘moving with head’, the staff member ‘moving with arms’ followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘moving with arms’ and the staff member ‘touching’ followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘vocalising’. These behavioural sequences occurred less frequently during meaningful moments of interaction in comparison to their onset.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>It is important that support staff are cognisant of all the (subtle) behavioural changes in people with profound intellectual disabilities (especially movements with their head) to discern potential behavioural responses. Moreover, they should be cognisant of their own behaviour, insofar as the conscious use of behaviour may facilitate the development of meaningful interactions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47232,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"53 1","pages":"113-123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bld.12622","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predecessors of Behavioural Initiatives by People With Profound Intellectual Disabilities During Their Interactions With Support Staff: An Exploratory Microanalytical Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Wieneke Penninga, Alexander H. C. Hendriks, Hedwig J. A. van Bakel, Petri J. C. M. Embregts\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bld.12622\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Initiating meaningful moments of interaction with people with profound intellectual disabilities can prove to be difficult for support staff. Exploring the behaviour of support staff that precedes the initiations of behaviour by people with profound intellectual disabilities helps to shed light upon the potential facilitating effects of staff behaviour.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three meaningful moments of interaction between support staff and people with profound intellectual disabilities that were recorded were then microanalytically coded, along with the initial onset of these moments. Each behaviour initiated by people with profound intellectual disabilities was examined to see what specific behaviour by the support staff began precedingly.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The most frequently displayed ‘staff–client’ behavioural sequences were ‘looking’, ‘moving with head’, ‘moving with arms’ or ‘vocalisation’ of support staff followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘moving with head’, the staff member ‘moving with arms’ followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘moving with arms’ and the staff member ‘touching’ followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘vocalising’. These behavioural sequences occurred less frequently during meaningful moments of interaction in comparison to their onset.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>It is important that support staff are cognisant of all the (subtle) behavioural changes in people with profound intellectual disabilities (especially movements with their head) to discern potential behavioural responses. Moreover, they should be cognisant of their own behaviour, insofar as the conscious use of behaviour may facilitate the development of meaningful interactions.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"113-123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bld.12622\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12622\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12622","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predecessors of Behavioural Initiatives by People With Profound Intellectual Disabilities During Their Interactions With Support Staff: An Exploratory Microanalytical Analysis
Background
Initiating meaningful moments of interaction with people with profound intellectual disabilities can prove to be difficult for support staff. Exploring the behaviour of support staff that precedes the initiations of behaviour by people with profound intellectual disabilities helps to shed light upon the potential facilitating effects of staff behaviour.
Methods
Three meaningful moments of interaction between support staff and people with profound intellectual disabilities that were recorded were then microanalytically coded, along with the initial onset of these moments. Each behaviour initiated by people with profound intellectual disabilities was examined to see what specific behaviour by the support staff began precedingly.
Findings
The most frequently displayed ‘staff–client’ behavioural sequences were ‘looking’, ‘moving with head’, ‘moving with arms’ or ‘vocalisation’ of support staff followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘moving with head’, the staff member ‘moving with arms’ followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘moving with arms’ and the staff member ‘touching’ followed by the person with profound intellectual disabilities ‘vocalising’. These behavioural sequences occurred less frequently during meaningful moments of interaction in comparison to their onset.
Conclusions
It is important that support staff are cognisant of all the (subtle) behavioural changes in people with profound intellectual disabilities (especially movements with their head) to discern potential behavioural responses. Moreover, they should be cognisant of their own behaviour, insofar as the conscious use of behaviour may facilitate the development of meaningful interactions.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Learning Disabilities is an interdisciplinary international peer-reviewed journal which aims to be the leading journal in the learning disability field. It is the official Journal of the British Institute of Learning Disabilities. It encompasses contemporary debate/s and developments in research, policy and practice that are relevant to the field of learning disabilities. It publishes original refereed papers, regular special issues giving comprehensive coverage to specific subject areas, and especially commissioned keynote reviews on major topics. In addition, there are reviews of books and training materials, and a letters section. The focus of the journal is on practical issues, with current debates and research reports. Topics covered could include, but not be limited to: Current trends in residential and day-care service Inclusion, rehabilitation and quality of life Education and training Historical and inclusive pieces [particularly welcomed are those co-written with people with learning disabilities] Therapies Mental health issues Employment and occupation Recreation and leisure; Ethical issues, advocacy and rights Family and carers Health issues Adoption and fostering Causation and management of specific syndromes Staff training New technology Policy critique and impact.