如何在全纳高等教育中指导而不是直升机学生

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Verena Hawelka, Maria Kreilinger, Christina Penn, Eva Steindl
{"title":"如何在全纳高等教育中指导而不是直升机学生","authors":"Verena Hawelka,&nbsp;Maria Kreilinger,&nbsp;Christina Penn,&nbsp;Eva Steindl","doi":"10.1111/bld.12646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>BLuE – ‘Bildung, Lebenskompetenz und Empowerment’ [‘Education, Life Skills and Empowerment’] – is an inclusive university programme with a peer-mentoring system, where students of the primary education programme assist students with attributed cognitive or mental disabilities as tutors. Deutsch et al. (2024) showed that it is a challenge to achieve a balance between providing adequate support and avoiding well-meant but exaggerated support. This balance requires on-going negotiations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The participatory research project contained two sequences of semi-structured focus groups with BLuE students and tutors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Various points of tension, all concerning negotiation of responsibility, were identified. Tutors individually seem to manage responsibility for the BLuE student's study without openly discussing it, often making decisions internally. BLuE students make decisions for themselves in accordance with tutors' preferences but without reference to recognised problems.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Tutors play a crucial role in fostering self-responsibility and autonomy in BLuE students. Rather than feeling solely responsible for ensuring course requirements are met, tutors and BLuE students should engage in open discussions about how to share responsibility for the student's studies and the process of gaining greater independence.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47232,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"53 1","pages":"203-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How to Mentor But Not to Helicopter Students in Inclusive Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"Verena Hawelka,&nbsp;Maria Kreilinger,&nbsp;Christina Penn,&nbsp;Eva Steindl\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/bld.12646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>BLuE – ‘Bildung, Lebenskompetenz und Empowerment’ [‘Education, Life Skills and Empowerment’] – is an inclusive university programme with a peer-mentoring system, where students of the primary education programme assist students with attributed cognitive or mental disabilities as tutors. Deutsch et al. (2024) showed that it is a challenge to achieve a balance between providing adequate support and avoiding well-meant but exaggerated support. This balance requires on-going negotiations.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The participatory research project contained two sequences of semi-structured focus groups with BLuE students and tutors.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Various points of tension, all concerning negotiation of responsibility, were identified. Tutors individually seem to manage responsibility for the BLuE student's study without openly discussing it, often making decisions internally. BLuE students make decisions for themselves in accordance with tutors' preferences but without reference to recognised problems.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Tutors play a crucial role in fostering self-responsibility and autonomy in BLuE students. Rather than feeling solely responsible for ensuring course requirements are met, tutors and BLuE students should engage in open discussions about how to share responsibility for the student's studies and the process of gaining greater independence.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"203-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12646\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bld.12646","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景蓝——“教育、生活技能和赋权”——是一个具有同侪指导制度的包容性大学项目,初等教育项目的学生作为导师帮助有认知或精神残疾的学生。Deutsch等人(2024)表明,在提供足够的支持和避免善意但夸大的支持之间取得平衡是一项挑战。这种平衡需要持续的谈判。方法参与式研究项目包括两个序列的半结构化焦点小组,由BLuE学生和导师组成。结果确定了与责任协商有关的各种紧张点。导师们似乎在没有公开讨论的情况下,单独管理蓝系学生的学习责任,往往是在内部做出决定。蓝色学生根据导师的喜好自行做决定,而不参考已知的问题。结论导师在培养蓝色学生的自我责任感和自主性方面起着至关重要的作用。导师和BLuE的学生不应该只对确保满足课程要求负责,而应该就如何分担学生的学习责任和获得更大独立性的过程进行公开讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How to Mentor But Not to Helicopter Students in Inclusive Higher Education

Background

BLuE – ‘Bildung, Lebenskompetenz und Empowerment’ [‘Education, Life Skills and Empowerment’] – is an inclusive university programme with a peer-mentoring system, where students of the primary education programme assist students with attributed cognitive or mental disabilities as tutors. Deutsch et al. (2024) showed that it is a challenge to achieve a balance between providing adequate support and avoiding well-meant but exaggerated support. This balance requires on-going negotiations.

Methods

The participatory research project contained two sequences of semi-structured focus groups with BLuE students and tutors.

Results

Various points of tension, all concerning negotiation of responsibility, were identified. Tutors individually seem to manage responsibility for the BLuE student's study without openly discussing it, often making decisions internally. BLuE students make decisions for themselves in accordance with tutors' preferences but without reference to recognised problems.

Conclusions

Tutors play a crucial role in fostering self-responsibility and autonomy in BLuE students. Rather than feeling solely responsible for ensuring course requirements are met, tutors and BLuE students should engage in open discussions about how to share responsibility for the student's studies and the process of gaining greater independence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
74
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Learning Disabilities is an interdisciplinary international peer-reviewed journal which aims to be the leading journal in the learning disability field. It is the official Journal of the British Institute of Learning Disabilities. It encompasses contemporary debate/s and developments in research, policy and practice that are relevant to the field of learning disabilities. It publishes original refereed papers, regular special issues giving comprehensive coverage to specific subject areas, and especially commissioned keynote reviews on major topics. In addition, there are reviews of books and training materials, and a letters section. The focus of the journal is on practical issues, with current debates and research reports. Topics covered could include, but not be limited to: Current trends in residential and day-care service Inclusion, rehabilitation and quality of life Education and training Historical and inclusive pieces [particularly welcomed are those co-written with people with learning disabilities] Therapies Mental health issues Employment and occupation Recreation and leisure; Ethical issues, advocacy and rights Family and carers Health issues Adoption and fostering Causation and management of specific syndromes Staff training New technology Policy critique and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信