开发并验证基于图卷积网络(GCN)的上颌数字牙科模型(MDM)自动叠加方法。

Yichen Pan, Zhechen Zhang, Tianmin Xu, Gui Chen
{"title":"开发并验证基于图卷积网络(GCN)的上颌数字牙科模型(MDM)自动叠加方法。","authors":"Yichen Pan, Zhechen Zhang, Tianmin Xu, Gui Chen","doi":"10.2319/071224-555.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the accuracy and reliability of a graph convolutional network (GCN)-based superimposition method of a maxillary digital dental model (MDM) by comparing it with manual superimposition and quantifying the clinical error from this method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Based on a GCN, learning the features from 100 three-dimensional digital occlusal models under supervision of the palatal stable structure labels that were manually annotated by senior specialists, the palatal stable structure was automatically segmented. The average Hausdorff distance was calculated to assess the difference between automatic and manual segmentations. Tooth position and angulation, including rotation, tip, and torque, of bilateral upper first molars and central incisors were obtained to measure the clinical error of automatic superimposition. Reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Hausdorff distance was 0.36 mm between automatic and manual segmentations of the palatal stable region and was larger than the intraexaminer and interexaminer deviations. The tooth position deviation was <0.32 mm, and the tooth angulation difference was <0.26° for tip and torque, and 0.46-0.61° in rotation. ICCs, used for assessment of reliability, ranged from 0.82 to 0.99 in all variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GCN-based MDM superimposition is an efficient method for the assessment of tooth movement in adults. The clinical error in tooth position and angulation induced by the method was clinically acceptable. Reliability was as high as manual segmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":"259-265"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of a graph convolutional network (GCN)-based automatic superimposition method for maxillary digital dental models (MDMs).\",\"authors\":\"Yichen Pan, Zhechen Zhang, Tianmin Xu, Gui Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.2319/071224-555.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To validate the accuracy and reliability of a graph convolutional network (GCN)-based superimposition method of a maxillary digital dental model (MDM) by comparing it with manual superimposition and quantifying the clinical error from this method.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Based on a GCN, learning the features from 100 three-dimensional digital occlusal models under supervision of the palatal stable structure labels that were manually annotated by senior specialists, the palatal stable structure was automatically segmented. The average Hausdorff distance was calculated to assess the difference between automatic and manual segmentations. Tooth position and angulation, including rotation, tip, and torque, of bilateral upper first molars and central incisors were obtained to measure the clinical error of automatic superimposition. Reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average Hausdorff distance was 0.36 mm between automatic and manual segmentations of the palatal stable region and was larger than the intraexaminer and interexaminer deviations. The tooth position deviation was <0.32 mm, and the tooth angulation difference was <0.26° for tip and torque, and 0.46-0.61° in rotation. ICCs, used for assessment of reliability, ranged from 0.82 to 0.99 in all variables.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GCN-based MDM superimposition is an efficient method for the assessment of tooth movement in adults. The clinical error in tooth position and angulation induced by the method was clinically acceptable. Reliability was as high as manual segmentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"259-265\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017548/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Angle orthodontist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2319/071224-555.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/071224-555.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过将基于图卷积网络(GCN)的上颌数字牙模型(MDM)叠加方法与人工叠加方法进行比较,并量化该方法的临床误差,验证该方法的准确性和可靠性。材料与方法:基于GCN,在资深专家手工标注的腭稳定结构标签的监督下,学习100个三维数字咬合模型的特征,对腭稳定结构进行自动分割。计算平均Hausdorff距离来评估自动和人工分割的差异。测量双侧上第一磨牙和中切牙的牙位和牙角,包括旋转、牙尖和牙转矩,测量自动叠加的临床误差。信度采用类内相关系数(ICC)计算。结果:腭稳定区自动分割与手动分割之间的平均Hausdorff距离为0.36 mm,且大于检查员内和检查员间的偏差。结论:基于gnn的MDM叠加是评估成人牙齿移动的有效方法。该方法引起的牙位和牙成角的临床误差在临床上是可以接受的。可靠性与人工分割一样高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of a graph convolutional network (GCN)-based automatic superimposition method for maxillary digital dental models (MDMs).

Objectives: To validate the accuracy and reliability of a graph convolutional network (GCN)-based superimposition method of a maxillary digital dental model (MDM) by comparing it with manual superimposition and quantifying the clinical error from this method.

Materials and methods: Based on a GCN, learning the features from 100 three-dimensional digital occlusal models under supervision of the palatal stable structure labels that were manually annotated by senior specialists, the palatal stable structure was automatically segmented. The average Hausdorff distance was calculated to assess the difference between automatic and manual segmentations. Tooth position and angulation, including rotation, tip, and torque, of bilateral upper first molars and central incisors were obtained to measure the clinical error of automatic superimposition. Reliability was calculated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: The average Hausdorff distance was 0.36 mm between automatic and manual segmentations of the palatal stable region and was larger than the intraexaminer and interexaminer deviations. The tooth position deviation was <0.32 mm, and the tooth angulation difference was <0.26° for tip and torque, and 0.46-0.61° in rotation. ICCs, used for assessment of reliability, ranged from 0.82 to 0.99 in all variables.

Conclusions: The GCN-based MDM superimposition is an efficient method for the assessment of tooth movement in adults. The clinical error in tooth position and angulation induced by the method was clinically acceptable. Reliability was as high as manual segmentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信