使用预先确定的变更控制计划,以便作为医疗设备发布新版本的软件。

Expert review of medical devices Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-28 DOI:10.1080/17434440.2025.2468787
Jacques Andre DuPreez, Olivia McDermott
{"title":"使用预先确定的变更控制计划,以便作为医疗设备发布新版本的软件。","authors":"Jacques Andre DuPreez, Olivia McDermott","doi":"10.1080/17434440.2025.2468787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates how Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs) can support the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) of certain Software as a Medical Device (SaMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Targeted surveys collected qualitative and quantitative data on the current regulatory change process for SaMD; the use of PCCPs; the potential parameters of PCCPs in terms of technical, clinical, usability, and administrative changes to SaMD; and whether PCCPs could be used more broadly for all SaMDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that the current regulatory approach is not fit for purpose, specifically regarding fast-moving SaMD or continuous-learning AI SaMD. There was strong support for PCCPs to cover device technology, usability, and administrative changes, while clinical changes had limited support and required further investigation. The EU lags behind the US and now the UK in addressing these challenges and should look to legislate and implement PCCPs to ensure ongoing innovation and investment in digital health technologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work is novel in the gathering of meaningful input from experts, practitioners, and regulatory professionals within the SaMD industry located in the EU, UK, and US on the value and need for PCCPs. This study has implications for practice and policy as it can inform SaMD guidance and legislation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94006,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of medical devices","volume":" ","pages":"261-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The use of predetermined change control plans to enable the release of new versions of software as a medical device.\",\"authors\":\"Jacques Andre DuPreez, Olivia McDermott\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17434440.2025.2468787\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study investigates how Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs) can support the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) of certain Software as a Medical Device (SaMD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Targeted surveys collected qualitative and quantitative data on the current regulatory change process for SaMD; the use of PCCPs; the potential parameters of PCCPs in terms of technical, clinical, usability, and administrative changes to SaMD; and whether PCCPs could be used more broadly for all SaMDs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results indicate that the current regulatory approach is not fit for purpose, specifically regarding fast-moving SaMD or continuous-learning AI SaMD. There was strong support for PCCPs to cover device technology, usability, and administrative changes, while clinical changes had limited support and required further investigation. The EU lags behind the US and now the UK in addressing these challenges and should look to legislate and implement PCCPs to ensure ongoing innovation and investment in digital health technologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This work is novel in the gathering of meaningful input from experts, practitioners, and regulatory professionals within the SaMD industry located in the EU, UK, and US on the value and need for PCCPs. This study has implications for practice and policy as it can inform SaMD guidance and legislation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"261-275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert review of medical devices\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2468787\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of medical devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2025.2468787","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨预定变更控制计划(pccp)如何支持某些医疗器械软件(samd)的软件开发生命周期(SDLC)。方法:通过有针对性的调查,收集当前SaMD监管变化过程的定性和定量数据;PCCPs的使用;就SaMD的技术、临床、可用性和管理变化而言,PCCPs的潜在参数;以及PCCPs是否可以更广泛地用于所有SaMD。结果:结果表明,目前的监管方法不适合目的,特别是对于快速移动的SaMD或持续学习的AI SaMD。对PCCPs的大力支持涵盖了设备技术、可用性和管理变更,而临床变更的支持有限,需要进一步调查。在应对这些挑战方面,欧盟落后于美国,现在又落后于英国,应该立法和实施PCCPs,以确保数字医疗技术的持续创新和投资。结论:这项工作是新颖的,因为它收集了来自欧盟、英国和美国SaMD行业的专家、从业者和监管专业人士对pccp的价值和需求的有意义的投入。这项研究对实践和政策具有启示意义,因为它可以为SaMD指导和立法提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of predetermined change control plans to enable the release of new versions of software as a medical device.

Objectives: This study investigates how Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs) can support the Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC) of certain Software as a Medical Device (SaMD).

Methods: Targeted surveys collected qualitative and quantitative data on the current regulatory change process for SaMD; the use of PCCPs; the potential parameters of PCCPs in terms of technical, clinical, usability, and administrative changes to SaMD; and whether PCCPs could be used more broadly for all SaMDs.

Results: Results indicate that the current regulatory approach is not fit for purpose, specifically regarding fast-moving SaMD or continuous-learning AI SaMD. There was strong support for PCCPs to cover device technology, usability, and administrative changes, while clinical changes had limited support and required further investigation. The EU lags behind the US and now the UK in addressing these challenges and should look to legislate and implement PCCPs to ensure ongoing innovation and investment in digital health technologies.

Conclusion: This work is novel in the gathering of meaningful input from experts, practitioners, and regulatory professionals within the SaMD industry located in the EU, UK, and US on the value and need for PCCPs. This study has implications for practice and policy as it can inform SaMD guidance and legislation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信