在接受前列腺立体定向直肠内放疗的患者中,持续营养学家指导肠准备的效果:一项前瞻性试点试验。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Yonatan Carmeli, Yael Shpatz, Iris Oren-Ivry, Anat Mansano, Ron Lewin, Idan BarOrian, Jacob Mattout, Ilana Weiss, Ory Haisraely, Yaacov Richard Lawrence, Zvi Symon
{"title":"在接受前列腺立体定向直肠内放疗的患者中,持续营养学家指导肠准备的效果:一项前瞻性试点试验。","authors":"Yonatan Carmeli, Yael Shpatz, Iris Oren-Ivry, Anat Mansano, Ron Lewin, Idan BarOrian, Jacob Mattout, Ilana Weiss, Ory Haisraely, Yaacov Richard Lawrence, Zvi Symon","doi":"10.1097/COC.0000000000001178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of a daily nutritionist consultation on rectal volume, gas, and prostate displacement during Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment (SBRT) with an endorectal spacer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six consecutive patients receiving 5 fraction SBRT with endorectal spacing were prospectively enrolled for an intensive daily nutritionist intervention utilizing biofeedback based on image guidance from each fraction. A retrospective control cohort receiving a standard bowel preparation was compared. Rectal volume, rectal gas, and prostate displacement were assessed by analysis of cone beam computed tomography. Data was analyzed using the SPSS statistics software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intense dietary intervention with biofeedback led to a consistently lower rectal gas score over 5 fractions ( P <0.001) and less variability in rectal volume during prostate SBRT indicating a nonsignificant trend for superior preparation in the intervention group compared with controls, particularly for the first 2 fractions. However, there was no significant impact on prostate displacement as measured by couch correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intense dietary consultations effectively reduce rectal gas and variation of rectal volume during prostate SBRT with endorectal spacing. However, there was no advantage in reducing prostate displacement. Thus, labor-intensive daily nutritionist intervention with biofeedback is not cost-effective in reducing organ motion in patients with endorectal spacers compared with standard pretreatment dietary advice and is not recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":50812,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","volume":" ","pages":"314-318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Continuous Nutritionist-led Guidance on Bowel Preparation in Patients Undergoing Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment With Endorectal Spacing: A Prospective Pilot Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yonatan Carmeli, Yael Shpatz, Iris Oren-Ivry, Anat Mansano, Ron Lewin, Idan BarOrian, Jacob Mattout, Ilana Weiss, Ory Haisraely, Yaacov Richard Lawrence, Zvi Symon\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/COC.0000000000001178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effect of a daily nutritionist consultation on rectal volume, gas, and prostate displacement during Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment (SBRT) with an endorectal spacer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six consecutive patients receiving 5 fraction SBRT with endorectal spacing were prospectively enrolled for an intensive daily nutritionist intervention utilizing biofeedback based on image guidance from each fraction. A retrospective control cohort receiving a standard bowel preparation was compared. Rectal volume, rectal gas, and prostate displacement were assessed by analysis of cone beam computed tomography. Data was analyzed using the SPSS statistics software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intense dietary intervention with biofeedback led to a consistently lower rectal gas score over 5 fractions ( P <0.001) and less variability in rectal volume during prostate SBRT indicating a nonsignificant trend for superior preparation in the intervention group compared with controls, particularly for the first 2 fractions. However, there was no significant impact on prostate displacement as measured by couch correction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intense dietary consultations effectively reduce rectal gas and variation of rectal volume during prostate SBRT with endorectal spacing. However, there was no advantage in reducing prostate displacement. Thus, labor-intensive daily nutritionist intervention with biofeedback is not cost-effective in reducing organ motion in patients with endorectal spacers compared with standard pretreatment dietary advice and is not recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"314-318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001178\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/COC.0000000000001178","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价每日营养师咨询对直肠内间隔器立体定向体放射治疗(SBRT)期间直肠体积、气体和前列腺移位的影响。方法:前瞻性招募26例连续接受5段直肠内间隔SBRT的患者,利用基于每个部分图像引导的生物反馈进行强化的每日营养学家干预。接受标准肠道准备的回顾性对照队列进行比较。直肠容积、直肠气体和前列腺位移通过锥形束计算机断层扫描分析进行评估。数据采用SPSS统计软件进行分析。结果:生物反馈强化饮食干预导致直肠气体评分在5个分数上持续降低(p结论:强化饮食咨询有效地减少直肠气体和直肠容积变化在有直肠内间隔的前列腺SBRT中。然而,在减少前列腺移位方面没有优势。因此,与标准预处理饮食建议相比,劳动密集型的每日营养学家生物反馈干预在减少直肠内间隔器患者器官运动方面并不具有成本效益,因此不推荐使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Continuous Nutritionist-led Guidance on Bowel Preparation in Patients Undergoing Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment With Endorectal Spacing: A Prospective Pilot Trial.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a daily nutritionist consultation on rectal volume, gas, and prostate displacement during Stereotactic Body Radiation Treatment (SBRT) with an endorectal spacer.

Methods: Twenty-six consecutive patients receiving 5 fraction SBRT with endorectal spacing were prospectively enrolled for an intensive daily nutritionist intervention utilizing biofeedback based on image guidance from each fraction. A retrospective control cohort receiving a standard bowel preparation was compared. Rectal volume, rectal gas, and prostate displacement were assessed by analysis of cone beam computed tomography. Data was analyzed using the SPSS statistics software.

Results: Intense dietary intervention with biofeedback led to a consistently lower rectal gas score over 5 fractions ( P <0.001) and less variability in rectal volume during prostate SBRT indicating a nonsignificant trend for superior preparation in the intervention group compared with controls, particularly for the first 2 fractions. However, there was no significant impact on prostate displacement as measured by couch correction.

Conclusions: Intense dietary consultations effectively reduce rectal gas and variation of rectal volume during prostate SBRT with endorectal spacing. However, there was no advantage in reducing prostate displacement. Thus, labor-intensive daily nutritionist intervention with biofeedback is not cost-effective in reducing organ motion in patients with endorectal spacers compared with standard pretreatment dietary advice and is not recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​American Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal for cancer surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, and pediatric oncologists. The emphasis of AJCO is on combined modality multidisciplinary loco-regional management of cancer. The journal also gives emphasis to translational research, outcome studies, and cost utility analyses, and includes opinion pieces and review articles. The editorial board includes a large number of distinguished surgeons, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, GYN oncologists, pediatric oncologists, and others who are internationally recognized for expertise in their fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信