术中细胞回收在成人脊柱畸形矫正中的应用评估回血量。

IF 1.8 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine deformity Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1007/s43390-025-01055-6
Katherine D Drexelius, Lindsey E Miller, Rebecca J DeCarlo, Trent A VanHorn, Michael A Bohl
{"title":"术中细胞回收在成人脊柱畸形矫正中的应用评估回血量。","authors":"Katherine D Drexelius, Lindsey E Miller, Rebecca J DeCarlo, Trent A VanHorn, Michael A Bohl","doi":"10.1007/s43390-025-01055-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While multiple studies have evaluated the role of intraoperative red blood cell salvage (IOCS) in instrumented posterior spinal fusion as a method to reduce allogenic blood transfusion and its associated risks and cost, few studies have quantified the blood available for return to the patient when using IOCS. Given this paucity of data, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between estimated blood loss and cell saver volume returned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent elective spinal fusion for correction of deformity requiring six or more levels of fusion were included. Demographic data, surgical details, EBL as measured by cell saver, and cell saver blood volume returned were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>138 consecutive patients were included in the study. Average EBL as measured by cell saver across 138 cases was 734 cc. Based on patients' height, weight, and sex, the average percentage of estimated circulating blood volume lost during surgery was 15.9%. Average EBL per level was 84.2 cc.; mean percentage of total blood volume lost per level was 1.8%. Average blood volume returned was 256 cc., resulting in an average 34.9% of blood loss returned to the patient via IOCS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, 34.9% of blood lost was subsequently transfused. While literature on this topic is very limited, this finding was similar to smaller cohorts that have examined IOCS autologous transfusion volumes. A better understanding of the available fraction of blood for return may allow providers to predict the need for allogenic blood transfusion or more clearly evaluate cost effectiveness of IOCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":"1223-1229"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing blood volume returned with use of intraoperative cell salvage in adult spinal deformity correction.\",\"authors\":\"Katherine D Drexelius, Lindsey E Miller, Rebecca J DeCarlo, Trent A VanHorn, Michael A Bohl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43390-025-01055-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>While multiple studies have evaluated the role of intraoperative red blood cell salvage (IOCS) in instrumented posterior spinal fusion as a method to reduce allogenic blood transfusion and its associated risks and cost, few studies have quantified the blood available for return to the patient when using IOCS. Given this paucity of data, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between estimated blood loss and cell saver volume returned.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent elective spinal fusion for correction of deformity requiring six or more levels of fusion were included. Demographic data, surgical details, EBL as measured by cell saver, and cell saver blood volume returned were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>138 consecutive patients were included in the study. Average EBL as measured by cell saver across 138 cases was 734 cc. Based on patients' height, weight, and sex, the average percentage of estimated circulating blood volume lost during surgery was 15.9%. Average EBL per level was 84.2 cc.; mean percentage of total blood volume lost per level was 1.8%. Average blood volume returned was 256 cc., resulting in an average 34.9% of blood loss returned to the patient via IOCS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>On average, 34.9% of blood lost was subsequently transfused. While literature on this topic is very limited, this finding was similar to smaller cohorts that have examined IOCS autologous transfusion volumes. A better understanding of the available fraction of blood for return may allow providers to predict the need for allogenic blood transfusion or more clearly evaluate cost effectiveness of IOCS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Spine deformity\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1223-1229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Spine deformity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01055-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-025-01055-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:虽然有多项研究评估了术中红细胞回收(IOCS)作为一种减少同种异体输血及其相关风险和成本的方法在固定后路脊柱融合术中的作用,但很少有研究量化了使用IOCS时可回流到患者体内的血液。考虑到数据的缺乏,本研究的目的是评估估计失血量与细胞保存体积之间的关系。方法:年龄在18岁或以上,接受选择性脊柱融合术以矫正畸形,需要6个或更多的融合术。记录人口统计数据、手术细节、细胞保存器测量的EBL和细胞保存器回血量。结果:138例患者连续纳入研究。138例患者的平均EBL为734毫升。基于患者的身高、体重和性别,手术期间估计循环血量损失的平均百分比为15.9%。每水平平均EBL为84.2 cc;每个水平总血容量损失的平均百分比为1.8%。平均回血量为256cc,导致平均34.9%的失血量通过IOCS返回患者。结论:平均失血量的34.9%随后再次输血。虽然关于这一主题的文献非常有限,但这一发现与研究过IOCS自体输血量的较小队列相似。更好地了解可供回血的可用血液比例可以使提供者预测异体输血的需求或更清楚地评估IOCS的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing blood volume returned with use of intraoperative cell salvage in adult spinal deformity correction.

Purpose: While multiple studies have evaluated the role of intraoperative red blood cell salvage (IOCS) in instrumented posterior spinal fusion as a method to reduce allogenic blood transfusion and its associated risks and cost, few studies have quantified the blood available for return to the patient when using IOCS. Given this paucity of data, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between estimated blood loss and cell saver volume returned.

Methods: Patients aged 18 years or older who underwent elective spinal fusion for correction of deformity requiring six or more levels of fusion were included. Demographic data, surgical details, EBL as measured by cell saver, and cell saver blood volume returned were recorded.

Results: 138 consecutive patients were included in the study. Average EBL as measured by cell saver across 138 cases was 734 cc. Based on patients' height, weight, and sex, the average percentage of estimated circulating blood volume lost during surgery was 15.9%. Average EBL per level was 84.2 cc.; mean percentage of total blood volume lost per level was 1.8%. Average blood volume returned was 256 cc., resulting in an average 34.9% of blood loss returned to the patient via IOCS.

Conclusions: On average, 34.9% of blood lost was subsequently transfused. While literature on this topic is very limited, this finding was similar to smaller cohorts that have examined IOCS autologous transfusion volumes. A better understanding of the available fraction of blood for return may allow providers to predict the need for allogenic blood transfusion or more clearly evaluate cost effectiveness of IOCS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信