IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70158
Anne Kuusisto, Kaija Saranto, Katriina Lähteenmäki, Anu Soikkeli-Jalonen, Elina Haavisto
{"title":"Patients' Experiences With Advance Care Planning and Decision-Making: An Interview Study in Finnish Hospital Palliative Care Wards.","authors":"Anne Kuusisto, Kaija Saranto, Katriina Lähteenmäki, Anu Soikkeli-Jalonen, Elina Haavisto","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim and objective: </strong>This study described patients' experiences with advance care planning and decision-making in Finnish hospital palliative care wards.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive qualitative study with semi-structured individual interviews.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study group consisted of purposely selected patients in palliative care wards from two university hospital districts. A pretested interview guide was used. The interviews focused on three main themes with auxiliary questions. Data were gathered until data saturation was reached. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 patients with cancer were interviewed. Patients' experiences with advance care planning in palliative care were grouped into three parent categories with subcategories: (1) Making plans for the end of life (need for psychosocial support in cancer disease and wish for goals of care discussion), (2) Symptom management planning (wish for pharmacological interventions for symptom management and wish for non-pharmacological interventions for symptom management) and (3) Palliative care coordination (need for discharge planning and wish for compatibility between team members). Patients' experiences with care decision-making in palliative care were grouped into two parent categories with subcategories: (1) healthcare professional as a care decision-maker (medical care decision-making, nursing care decision-making and inter-professional care decision-making) and (2) shared decision-making (need for patient involvement in shared decision-making and need for family member involvement in shared decision-making).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the need for advance care planning and involvement in shared decision-making in palliative care from patient perspectives.</p><p><strong>Relevance for clinical practice: </strong>The results from this study show that nurses must be critically concerned about the early and intentional initiation of palliative care.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies checklist (COREQ) was used.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>The data consists of answers given by patients in interviews.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"12 2","pages":"e70158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833169/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70158","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的和目标本研究描述了芬兰医院姑息关怀病房中患者在预先护理规划和决策方面的经验:方法:通过半结构化个人访谈进行描述性定性研究:研究小组由特意从两所大学医院的姑息关怀病房中挑选出来的病人组成。采用了预先测试的访谈指南。访谈围绕三个主题进行,并附有辅助问题。数据一直收集到数据饱和为止。采用归纳内容分析法对数据进行分析:共对 20 名癌症患者进行了访谈。患者对姑息治疗中预先护理计划的体验分为三个母类和子类:(1) 制定生命末期计划(需要在癌症疾病中获得社会心理支持,希望讨论护理目标),(2) 症状管理计划(希望使用药物干预进行症状管理,希望使用非药物干预进行症状管理),(3) 姑息治疗协调(需要出院计划,希望团队成员之间相互配合)。患者在姑息关怀中的关怀决策经验被分为两个母类和子类:(1)医护人员作为关怀决策者(医疗关怀决策、护理关怀决策和跨专业关怀决策)和(2)共同决策(患者参与共同决策的需求和家庭成员参与共同决策的需求):本研究从患者的角度强调了姑息关怀中预先护理规划和参与共同决策的必要性:本研究结果表明,护士必须高度关注姑息关怀的早期和有意启动:报告方法:采用定性研究综合报告标准清单(COREQ):数据由患者在访谈中给出的答案组成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' Experiences With Advance Care Planning and Decision-Making: An Interview Study in Finnish Hospital Palliative Care Wards.

Aim and objective: This study described patients' experiences with advance care planning and decision-making in Finnish hospital palliative care wards.

Design: A descriptive qualitative study with semi-structured individual interviews.

Methods: The study group consisted of purposely selected patients in palliative care wards from two university hospital districts. A pretested interview guide was used. The interviews focused on three main themes with auxiliary questions. Data were gathered until data saturation was reached. The data were analysed using inductive content analysis.

Results: A total of 20 patients with cancer were interviewed. Patients' experiences with advance care planning in palliative care were grouped into three parent categories with subcategories: (1) Making plans for the end of life (need for psychosocial support in cancer disease and wish for goals of care discussion), (2) Symptom management planning (wish for pharmacological interventions for symptom management and wish for non-pharmacological interventions for symptom management) and (3) Palliative care coordination (need for discharge planning and wish for compatibility between team members). Patients' experiences with care decision-making in palliative care were grouped into two parent categories with subcategories: (1) healthcare professional as a care decision-maker (medical care decision-making, nursing care decision-making and inter-professional care decision-making) and (2) shared decision-making (need for patient involvement in shared decision-making and need for family member involvement in shared decision-making).

Conclusion: This study highlights the need for advance care planning and involvement in shared decision-making in palliative care from patient perspectives.

Relevance for clinical practice: The results from this study show that nurses must be critically concerned about the early and intentional initiation of palliative care.

Reporting method: The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies checklist (COREQ) was used.

Patient or public contribution: The data consists of answers given by patients in interviews.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信