[德国的呼吸治疗师:他们目前的培训和工作情况分析]。

IF 1.2 Q4 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Pneumologie Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-17 DOI:10.1055/a-2510-2625
Dennis Flügge, Matthias Held
{"title":"[德国的呼吸治疗师:他们目前的培训和工作情况分析]。","authors":"Dennis Flügge, Matthias Held","doi":"10.1055/a-2510-2625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although there has been a trainee program for respiratory therapists since 18 years, a representative survey of this field of activity is lacking. The aim of this study was to find out which professional groups felt addressed by the training program, how satisfied they were with the training and where the respiratory therapists were employed, to take a look at the organisation of the working conditions after further training and how cooperation with other professional groups functioned. An investigation into whether there were factors that had an influence on the above-mentioned points should provide an outlook on how respiratory therapy in Germany was likely to develop in the future and what would be important for its future work.In a quantitative cross-sectional study, a partially anonymised electronic survey was conducted among prospective and trained respiratory therapists in Germany. The survey was analysed using the (browser-based) programme \"Online Umfrage.com\" and the spreadsheet programme Microsoft Excel. The open questions were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.307 prospective and postgraduate respiratory therapists from all federal states and with varying years of continuing education took part in the survey. Most of the respondents worked in the clinical field; 90% of the respondents were rather or very satisfied with their further training. A quarter of them got no time off at all from work or only partially to participate in continuing education. Half of the respondents had not been able to get better salaries following their further training. Nevertheless, 81.25% of respiratory therapists said they would recommend the training programme to others. When asked what was important for the future, the answers varied and ranged from state recognition and better cooperation between training providers to better public relations work.Further training to become a respiratory therapist is seen as very positive. However, there are still significant problems in the areas of remuneration, time off and further training development. The type of supervisor was identified as one of the most important influencing factors. Thus, respiratory therapists who were subordinated to the medical service were more satisfied than those placed under the nursing service management.</p>","PeriodicalId":20197,"journal":{"name":"Pneumologie","volume":" ","pages":"274-283"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Respiratory therapists in Germany: An analysis of their current training and work situation].\",\"authors\":\"Dennis Flügge, Matthias Held\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2510-2625\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although there has been a trainee program for respiratory therapists since 18 years, a representative survey of this field of activity is lacking. The aim of this study was to find out which professional groups felt addressed by the training program, how satisfied they were with the training and where the respiratory therapists were employed, to take a look at the organisation of the working conditions after further training and how cooperation with other professional groups functioned. An investigation into whether there were factors that had an influence on the above-mentioned points should provide an outlook on how respiratory therapy in Germany was likely to develop in the future and what would be important for its future work.In a quantitative cross-sectional study, a partially anonymised electronic survey was conducted among prospective and trained respiratory therapists in Germany. The survey was analysed using the (browser-based) programme \\\"Online Umfrage.com\\\" and the spreadsheet programme Microsoft Excel. The open questions were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.307 prospective and postgraduate respiratory therapists from all federal states and with varying years of continuing education took part in the survey. Most of the respondents worked in the clinical field; 90% of the respondents were rather or very satisfied with their further training. A quarter of them got no time off at all from work or only partially to participate in continuing education. Half of the respondents had not been able to get better salaries following their further training. Nevertheless, 81.25% of respiratory therapists said they would recommend the training programme to others. When asked what was important for the future, the answers varied and ranged from state recognition and better cooperation between training providers to better public relations work.Further training to become a respiratory therapist is seen as very positive. However, there are still significant problems in the areas of remuneration, time off and further training development. The type of supervisor was identified as one of the most important influencing factors. Thus, respiratory therapists who were subordinated to the medical service were more satisfied than those placed under the nursing service management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pneumologie\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"274-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pneumologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2510-2625\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pneumologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2510-2625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管自18年以来一直有呼吸治疗师的培训项目,但缺乏对这一活动领域的代表性调查。本研究的目的是找出哪些专业群体认为培训计划解决了问题,他们对培训的满意度如何,呼吸治疗师在哪里受雇,看看进一步培训后工作条件的组织,以及如何与其他专业群体合作。对是否存在影响上述各点的因素进行调查,应能对德国的呼吸治疗未来可能如何发展以及对其未来工作有何重要意义提供展望。在一项定量横断面研究中,在德国的前瞻性和训练有素的呼吸治疗师中进行了部分匿名的电子调查。这项调查是用(基于浏览器的)程序“Online Umfrage.com”和电子表格程序微软Excel进行分析的。采用Mayring的定性内容分析法对开放性问题进行分析。307名来自所有联邦州的未来和研究生呼吸治疗师参与了调查,他们接受了不同年限的继续教育。大多数受访者在临床领域工作;90%的受访者对他们的进一步培训相当满意或非常满意。其中四分之一的人根本没有休息时间,或者只是部分地参加继续教育。一半的受访者在接受进一步培训后未能获得更高的薪水。然而,81.25%的呼吸治疗师表示他们会向他人推荐该培训计划。当被问及对未来最重要的是什么时,答案各不相同,从国家认可、培训机构之间更好的合作到更好的公共关系工作。进一步培训成为呼吸治疗师被认为是非常积极的。但是,在薪酬、休假和进一步培训发展方面仍然存在重大问题。研究发现,管理者的类型是最重要的影响因素之一。因此,隶属于医疗服务的呼吸治疗师比隶属于护理服务管理的呼吸治疗师满意度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Respiratory therapists in Germany: An analysis of their current training and work situation].

Although there has been a trainee program for respiratory therapists since 18 years, a representative survey of this field of activity is lacking. The aim of this study was to find out which professional groups felt addressed by the training program, how satisfied they were with the training and where the respiratory therapists were employed, to take a look at the organisation of the working conditions after further training and how cooperation with other professional groups functioned. An investigation into whether there were factors that had an influence on the above-mentioned points should provide an outlook on how respiratory therapy in Germany was likely to develop in the future and what would be important for its future work.In a quantitative cross-sectional study, a partially anonymised electronic survey was conducted among prospective and trained respiratory therapists in Germany. The survey was analysed using the (browser-based) programme "Online Umfrage.com" and the spreadsheet programme Microsoft Excel. The open questions were analysed using Mayring's qualitative content analysis.307 prospective and postgraduate respiratory therapists from all federal states and with varying years of continuing education took part in the survey. Most of the respondents worked in the clinical field; 90% of the respondents were rather or very satisfied with their further training. A quarter of them got no time off at all from work or only partially to participate in continuing education. Half of the respondents had not been able to get better salaries following their further training. Nevertheless, 81.25% of respiratory therapists said they would recommend the training programme to others. When asked what was important for the future, the answers varied and ranged from state recognition and better cooperation between training providers to better public relations work.Further training to become a respiratory therapist is seen as very positive. However, there are still significant problems in the areas of remuneration, time off and further training development. The type of supervisor was identified as one of the most important influencing factors. Thus, respiratory therapists who were subordinated to the medical service were more satisfied than those placed under the nursing service management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pneumologie
Pneumologie RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
416
期刊介绍: Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Pneumologie DGP Organ des Deutschen Zentralkomitees zur Bekämpfung der Tuberkulose DZK Organ des Bundesverbandes der Pneumologen BdP Fachärzte für Lungen- und Bronchialheilkunde, Pneumologen und Allergologen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信