Qi Huang, Deborah A Lawlor, John Nolan, Ferran Espuny-Pujol, Massimo Caputo, Christina Pagel, Sonya Crowe, Rodney Cg Franklin, Kate L Brown
{"title":"英格兰和威尔士接受哨点先天性心脏病治疗的婴儿在大流行期间的结局","authors":"Qi Huang, Deborah A Lawlor, John Nolan, Ferran Espuny-Pujol, Massimo Caputo, Christina Pagel, Sonya Crowe, Rodney Cg Franklin, Kate L Brown","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002964","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) are clinically vulnerable to cardiac deteriorations and intercurrent infections. We aimed to quantify the impact of health system disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic, on their clinical outcomes and whether these differed by socioeconomic and ethnic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this population-based cohort study, we used linked electronic healthcare datasets from England and Wales to identify infants with nine sentinel CHDs born and undergoing intervention in 2018-2022. The outcomes of cardiac intervention timing, infant mortality and hospital care utilisation, were described by birth eras, and risk factors were explored using multivariable regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4900 included infants, 1545 (31.5%) were born prepandemic (reference), 1175 (24.0%) in the transition period, 1375 (28.0%) during restrictions and 810 (16.5%) postrestrictions. The casemix was hypoplastic left heart syndrome (195; 3.9%), functionally univentricular heart (180; 3.7%), transposition (610; 13.5%), pulmonary atresia (290; 5.9%), atrioventricular septal defect (590; 12.1%), tetralogy of Fallot (820; 16.7%), aortic stenosis (225; 4.6%), coarctation (740; 15.1%) and ventricular septal defect (1200; 24.5%).Compared with prepandemic, there was no evidence for delay in treatment procedures in transition, restrictions or postrestrictions eras. Infant mortality increased for those born in the transition period, adjusted OR 1.60 (95% CI 1.06, 2.42) p=0.01, but not in restrictions or postrestrictions. The days spent at home were similar with birth in transition and restrictions, but fewer for postrestrictions, adjusted days difference -2 (95% CI -4, 0), p=0.05.Outcomes did not vary by pandemic birth era according to social characteristics. There was higher infant mortality in the deprived versus non-deprived binary category (adjusted OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.11, 2.18), p=0.004) and there were fewer days spent at home for the most versus least deprived neighbourhood quintile (adjusted difference -4 (95% CI -6, -2), p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specialist care for infants with CHD during the pandemic, in terms of pathway procedure timing and healthcare contacts, was not compromised. Increased healthcare utilisation postpandemic and heath inequality based on socioeconomic status require further evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836792/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripandemic outcomes of infants treated for sentinel congenital heart diseases in England and Wales.\",\"authors\":\"Qi Huang, Deborah A Lawlor, John Nolan, Ferran Espuny-Pujol, Massimo Caputo, Christina Pagel, Sonya Crowe, Rodney Cg Franklin, Kate L Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/openhrt-2024-002964\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) are clinically vulnerable to cardiac deteriorations and intercurrent infections. We aimed to quantify the impact of health system disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic, on their clinical outcomes and whether these differed by socioeconomic and ethnic subgroups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this population-based cohort study, we used linked electronic healthcare datasets from England and Wales to identify infants with nine sentinel CHDs born and undergoing intervention in 2018-2022. The outcomes of cardiac intervention timing, infant mortality and hospital care utilisation, were described by birth eras, and risk factors were explored using multivariable regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 4900 included infants, 1545 (31.5%) were born prepandemic (reference), 1175 (24.0%) in the transition period, 1375 (28.0%) during restrictions and 810 (16.5%) postrestrictions. The casemix was hypoplastic left heart syndrome (195; 3.9%), functionally univentricular heart (180; 3.7%), transposition (610; 13.5%), pulmonary atresia (290; 5.9%), atrioventricular septal defect (590; 12.1%), tetralogy of Fallot (820; 16.7%), aortic stenosis (225; 4.6%), coarctation (740; 15.1%) and ventricular septal defect (1200; 24.5%).Compared with prepandemic, there was no evidence for delay in treatment procedures in transition, restrictions or postrestrictions eras. Infant mortality increased for those born in the transition period, adjusted OR 1.60 (95% CI 1.06, 2.42) p=0.01, but not in restrictions or postrestrictions. The days spent at home were similar with birth in transition and restrictions, but fewer for postrestrictions, adjusted days difference -2 (95% CI -4, 0), p=0.05.Outcomes did not vary by pandemic birth era according to social characteristics. There was higher infant mortality in the deprived versus non-deprived binary category (adjusted OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.11, 2.18), p=0.004) and there were fewer days spent at home for the most versus least deprived neighbourhood quintile (adjusted difference -4 (95% CI -6, -2), p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Specialist care for infants with CHD during the pandemic, in terms of pathway procedure timing and healthcare contacts, was not compromised. Increased healthcare utilisation postpandemic and heath inequality based on socioeconomic status require further evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Heart\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11836792/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Heart\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002964\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-002964","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:先天性心脏病(CHD)患儿在临床上易发生心脏恶化和并发感染。我们旨在量化COVID-19大流行期间卫生系统中断对临床结果的影响,以及这些影响是否因社会经济和种族亚组而异。方法:在这项基于人群的队列研究中,我们使用来自英格兰和威尔士的相关电子医疗数据集来识别2018-2022年出生并接受干预的9名前哨冠心病婴儿。心脏干预时机、婴儿死亡率和医院护理利用的结果以出生年龄描述,并使用多变量回归探讨危险因素。结果:纳入的4900例婴儿中,1545例(31.5%)出生在大流行前(参考),1175例(24.0%)出生在过渡期,1375例(28.0%)出生在限产期,810例(16.5%)出生在限产期。合并病例为左心发育不良综合征(195;3.9%),功能性单室心脏(180;3.7%),换位(610;13.5%),肺闭锁(290;5.9%),房室间隔缺损(590;12.1%),法洛四联症(820;16.7%),主动脉狭窄(225;4.6%),缩窄(740;15.1%)和室间隔缺损(1200;24.5%)。与大流行前相比,没有证据表明在过渡时期、限制时期或限制时期的治疗程序出现延误。在过渡期出生的婴儿死亡率增加,调整OR为1.60 (95% CI 1.06, 2.42) p=0.01,但在限制或限制后没有。在家中度过的天数与过渡期和限制出生时相似,但限制出生后的天数较少,调整后的天数差-2 (95% CI - 4,0), p=0.05。根据社会特征,结果没有因大流行的出生时间而变化。贫困儿童的婴儿死亡率高于非贫困儿童(调整后的OR为1.56 (95% CI为1.11,2.18),p=0.004),最贫困社区的五分位数与最贫困社区的五分位数相比,在家中度过的时间更少(调整后的差异为-4 (95% CI为-6,-2))。结论:大流行期间对冠心病婴儿的专科护理,在途径程序时间和医疗接触方面没有受到影响。大流行后卫生保健利用的增加和基于社会经济地位的卫生不平等需要进一步评估。
Peripandemic outcomes of infants treated for sentinel congenital heart diseases in England and Wales.
Background: Infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) are clinically vulnerable to cardiac deteriorations and intercurrent infections. We aimed to quantify the impact of health system disruptions during the COVID-19 pandemic, on their clinical outcomes and whether these differed by socioeconomic and ethnic subgroups.
Methods: In this population-based cohort study, we used linked electronic healthcare datasets from England and Wales to identify infants with nine sentinel CHDs born and undergoing intervention in 2018-2022. The outcomes of cardiac intervention timing, infant mortality and hospital care utilisation, were described by birth eras, and risk factors were explored using multivariable regression.
Results: Of 4900 included infants, 1545 (31.5%) were born prepandemic (reference), 1175 (24.0%) in the transition period, 1375 (28.0%) during restrictions and 810 (16.5%) postrestrictions. The casemix was hypoplastic left heart syndrome (195; 3.9%), functionally univentricular heart (180; 3.7%), transposition (610; 13.5%), pulmonary atresia (290; 5.9%), atrioventricular septal defect (590; 12.1%), tetralogy of Fallot (820; 16.7%), aortic stenosis (225; 4.6%), coarctation (740; 15.1%) and ventricular septal defect (1200; 24.5%).Compared with prepandemic, there was no evidence for delay in treatment procedures in transition, restrictions or postrestrictions eras. Infant mortality increased for those born in the transition period, adjusted OR 1.60 (95% CI 1.06, 2.42) p=0.01, but not in restrictions or postrestrictions. The days spent at home were similar with birth in transition and restrictions, but fewer for postrestrictions, adjusted days difference -2 (95% CI -4, 0), p=0.05.Outcomes did not vary by pandemic birth era according to social characteristics. There was higher infant mortality in the deprived versus non-deprived binary category (adjusted OR 1.56 (95% CI 1.11, 2.18), p=0.004) and there were fewer days spent at home for the most versus least deprived neighbourhood quintile (adjusted difference -4 (95% CI -6, -2), p<0.001).
Conclusions: Specialist care for infants with CHD during the pandemic, in terms of pathway procedure timing and healthcare contacts, was not compromised. Increased healthcare utilisation postpandemic and heath inequality based on socioeconomic status require further evaluation.
期刊介绍:
Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.