卫生保健专业人员对在临床和公共卫生环境中实施跌倒风险筛查工具的障碍和促进因素的看法。

IF 3.5 4区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Nathalie Frisendahl, Patrik Karlsson, Christina Sandlund, Stina Ek, Erika Franzén, Anne-Marie Boström, Anna-Karin Welmer
{"title":"卫生保健专业人员对在临床和公共卫生环境中实施跌倒风险筛查工具的障碍和促进因素的看法。","authors":"Nathalie Frisendahl, Patrik Karlsson, Christina Sandlund, Stina Ek, Erika Franzén, Anne-Marie Boström, Anna-Karin Welmer","doi":"10.1093/ptj/pzaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The experiences of health care professionals using new screening tools in clinical and public health settings are crucial to the implementation process. However, further research is needed on their experiences with fall risk screening. This study utilized the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to explore health care professionals' experiences with the First-time Injurious Falls (FIF) screening tool, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the FIF tool in primary health care and public health settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study with 4 focus group interviews and 7 individual interviews was carried out, using a semistructured interview guide. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis. The study included 20 participants (13 females and 7 males), with a mean age of 39 years (range 24 to 54). The participants were working in the primary health care setting (8 physical therapists, 3 occupational therapists, 3 managers, 2 registered nurses, and 1 dietician) and in a public health project (1 physical therapist and 2 health educators).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in 3 themes: \"a valuable tool in clinical practice,\" \"how to get everyone onboard when implementing fall risk screening,\" and \"applicable in many areas of health services but not in all\" with 4 related subthemes \"quick and easy to use for all health care professionals,\" \"simplifies assessment and creates a platform for discussion,\" \"need for clear instructions and action list,\" and \"should be incorporated into daily routines.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FIF tool was well-received by participants in practice as it was user-friendly and potentially effective in preventing falls. However, there is room for improvement, particularly in clarifying instructions to mitigate possible misinterpretations. The participants emphasized that implementation of a new screening tool requires favorable organizational conditions such as managerial support, that the tool is easily accessible, and the results are easy to document.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The FIF tool seems to be a valuable screening tool for predicting first-time injurious falls in older adults, suitable for use by various health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":20093,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017392/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health Care Professionals' Views of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Fall Risk Screening Tool in Clinical and Public Health Settings.\",\"authors\":\"Nathalie Frisendahl, Patrik Karlsson, Christina Sandlund, Stina Ek, Erika Franzén, Anne-Marie Boström, Anna-Karin Welmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ptj/pzaf018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The experiences of health care professionals using new screening tools in clinical and public health settings are crucial to the implementation process. However, further research is needed on their experiences with fall risk screening. This study utilized the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to explore health care professionals' experiences with the First-time Injurious Falls (FIF) screening tool, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the FIF tool in primary health care and public health settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study with 4 focus group interviews and 7 individual interviews was carried out, using a semistructured interview guide. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis. The study included 20 participants (13 females and 7 males), with a mean age of 39 years (range 24 to 54). The participants were working in the primary health care setting (8 physical therapists, 3 occupational therapists, 3 managers, 2 registered nurses, and 1 dietician) and in a public health project (1 physical therapist and 2 health educators).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis resulted in 3 themes: \\\"a valuable tool in clinical practice,\\\" \\\"how to get everyone onboard when implementing fall risk screening,\\\" and \\\"applicable in many areas of health services but not in all\\\" with 4 related subthemes \\\"quick and easy to use for all health care professionals,\\\" \\\"simplifies assessment and creates a platform for discussion,\\\" \\\"need for clear instructions and action list,\\\" and \\\"should be incorporated into daily routines.\\\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The FIF tool was well-received by participants in practice as it was user-friendly and potentially effective in preventing falls. However, there is room for improvement, particularly in clarifying instructions to mitigate possible misinterpretations. The participants emphasized that implementation of a new screening tool requires favorable organizational conditions such as managerial support, that the tool is easily accessible, and the results are easy to document.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>The FIF tool seems to be a valuable screening tool for predicting first-time injurious falls in older adults, suitable for use by various health care professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017392/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf018\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaf018","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:卫生保健专业人员在临床和公共卫生环境中使用新的筛查工具的经验对实施过程至关重要。然而,需要进一步研究他们在跌倒风险筛查方面的经验。本研究利用卫生服务研究实施综合促进行动(i-PARIHS)框架,探索卫生保健专业人员使用首次伤害性跌倒(FIF)筛查工具的经验,旨在确定在初级卫生保健和公共卫生机构中实施FIF工具的障碍和促进因素。方法:采用半结构化访谈指南,采用4次焦点小组访谈和7次个人访谈进行定性研究。访谈被记录下来,逐字抄录,并用反身性主题分析进行分析。这项研究。纳入20名参与者(13名女性,7名男性),平均年龄39岁(24 - 54岁)。参与者在初级卫生保健机构工作(8名物理治疗师、3名职业治疗师、3名管理人员、2名注册护士和1名营养师),并在公共卫生项目中工作(1名物理治疗师和2名健康教育者)。结果:分析得出3个主题:“临床实践中有价值的工具”、“如何在实施跌倒风险筛查时让每个人都参与”和“适用于卫生服务的许多领域,但并非全部”,以及4个相关的子主题:“所有卫生保健专业人员都能快速方便地使用”、“简化评估并创建讨论平台”、“需要明确的指导和行动清单”和“应纳入日常工作”。结论:FIF工具在实践中受到参与者的好评,因为它是用户友好的,并且可能有效地预防跌倒。但是,仍有改进的余地,特别是在澄清指示以减轻可能的误解方面。与会者强调,新的筛选工具的实施需要有利的组织条件,如管理支持,工具易于使用,结果易于记录。影响:FIF工具似乎是一种有价值的筛查工具,用于预测老年人首次伤害性跌倒,适合各种卫生保健专业人员使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health Care Professionals' Views of Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing a Fall Risk Screening Tool in Clinical and Public Health Settings.

Objective: The experiences of health care professionals using new screening tools in clinical and public health settings are crucial to the implementation process. However, further research is needed on their experiences with fall risk screening. This study utilized the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework to explore health care professionals' experiences with the First-time Injurious Falls (FIF) screening tool, aiming to identify barriers and facilitators for implementing the FIF tool in primary health care and public health settings.

Methods: A qualitative study with 4 focus group interviews and 7 individual interviews was carried out, using a semistructured interview guide. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed with reflexive thematic analysis. The study included 20 participants (13 females and 7 males), with a mean age of 39 years (range 24 to 54). The participants were working in the primary health care setting (8 physical therapists, 3 occupational therapists, 3 managers, 2 registered nurses, and 1 dietician) and in a public health project (1 physical therapist and 2 health educators).

Results: The analysis resulted in 3 themes: "a valuable tool in clinical practice," "how to get everyone onboard when implementing fall risk screening," and "applicable in many areas of health services but not in all" with 4 related subthemes "quick and easy to use for all health care professionals," "simplifies assessment and creates a platform for discussion," "need for clear instructions and action list," and "should be incorporated into daily routines."

Conclusion: The FIF tool was well-received by participants in practice as it was user-friendly and potentially effective in preventing falls. However, there is room for improvement, particularly in clarifying instructions to mitigate possible misinterpretations. The participants emphasized that implementation of a new screening tool requires favorable organizational conditions such as managerial support, that the tool is easily accessible, and the results are easy to document.

Impact: The FIF tool seems to be a valuable screening tool for predicting first-time injurious falls in older adults, suitable for use by various health care professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy
Physical Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy (PTJ) engages and inspires an international readership on topics related to physical therapy. As the leading international journal for research in physical therapy and related fields, PTJ publishes innovative and highly relevant content for both clinicians and scientists and uses a variety of interactive approaches to communicate that content, with the expressed purpose of improving patient care. PTJ"s circulation in 2008 is more than 72,000. Its 2007 impact factor was 2.152. The mean time from submission to first decision is 58 days. Time from acceptance to publication online is less than or equal to 3 months and from acceptance to publication in print is less than or equal to 5 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信