IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Anthony Vijayanathan, Deborah Bruce, Chu Yiu, Findlay MacAskill, Jonathan Makanjuola, Mark Stroud, Mo Salehan, Rob Merrett, Arun Sahai
{"title":"The use of clinical teaching associates (CTAs) in teaching male intimate examination to medical students: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Anthony Vijayanathan, Deborah Bruce, Chu Yiu, Findlay MacAskill, Jonathan Makanjuola, Mark Stroud, Mo Salehan, Rob Merrett, Arun Sahai","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2025.2464202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Genital examinations are challenging for medical students to learn in part due to practice opportunities. In an attempt to address this, we introduced clinical teaching associates (CTAs) who teach third year medical students and allow male intimate examinations to be practiced on themselves.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-blinded parallel-group RCT was conducted, recruiting 96 students. The control group was only given access to the current curriculum (lectures, videos, models) whilst the other group was offered this and a teaching session with CTAs, who are professionally trained, allowing students to examine them. Assessment took the form of a bespoke Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and a self-assessment confidence questionnaire before and after the teaching.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assessed by experienced surgeons, the group receiving the additional CTA teaching scored significantly higher than the control group in the OSCE in 55% (<i>n</i> = 11) of domains. This included, but was not limited to, competence at performing hernial orifice (effect size = 0.985), male genital (effect size = 0.943), penile (effect size = 1.347) and prostate examinations (effect size = 0.578). Assessment by the CTA, acting as the patient, also showed a significant difference in favour of the intervention group in all domains and included whether the patient felt safe (effect size = 0.797) and whether the patient would see the student again (effect size = 1.170).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The use of CTAs for teaching male intimate examination results in significantly greater student competence and confidence and their use should be considered in medical schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2025.2464202","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:医学生学习生殖器检查具有挑战性,部分原因是缺乏实践机会。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了临床教学助理(CTA),由他们为三年级医学生授课,并允许他们在自己身上练习男性私处检查:我们进行了一项单盲平行组 RCT 研究,共招募了 96 名学生。对照组学生只能学习现行课程(讲座、视频、模型),而另一组学生则可以学习现行课程,并与经过专业培训的 CTA 一起上一堂教学课,让学生对他们进行检查。评估形式包括定制的客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)和教学前后的自我评估信心问卷:由经验丰富的外科医生进行评估,在 OSCE 考试中,接受额外 CTA 教学的小组在 55% 的领域(n = 11)得分明显高于对照组。这包括但不限于进行疝气口(效应大小=0.985)、男性生殖器(效应大小=0.943)、阴茎(效应大小=1.347)和前列腺(效应大小=0.578)检查的能力。由 CTA 以患者身份进行的评估也显示,干预组在所有领域都有显著差异,包括患者是否感到安全(效应大小 = 0.797)以及患者是否会再次见到该学生(效应大小 = 1.170):讨论:使用 CTA 教授男性私密检查可显著提高学生的能力和信心,医学院校应考虑使用 CTA。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The use of clinical teaching associates (CTAs) in teaching male intimate examination to medical students: A randomised controlled trial.

Introduction: Genital examinations are challenging for medical students to learn in part due to practice opportunities. In an attempt to address this, we introduced clinical teaching associates (CTAs) who teach third year medical students and allow male intimate examinations to be practiced on themselves.

Materials and methods: A single-blinded parallel-group RCT was conducted, recruiting 96 students. The control group was only given access to the current curriculum (lectures, videos, models) whilst the other group was offered this and a teaching session with CTAs, who are professionally trained, allowing students to examine them. Assessment took the form of a bespoke Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and a self-assessment confidence questionnaire before and after the teaching.

Results: Assessed by experienced surgeons, the group receiving the additional CTA teaching scored significantly higher than the control group in the OSCE in 55% (n = 11) of domains. This included, but was not limited to, competence at performing hernial orifice (effect size = 0.985), male genital (effect size = 0.943), penile (effect size = 1.347) and prostate examinations (effect size = 0.578). Assessment by the CTA, acting as the patient, also showed a significant difference in favour of the intervention group in all domains and included whether the patient felt safe (effect size = 0.797) and whether the patient would see the student again (effect size = 1.170).

Discussion: The use of CTAs for teaching male intimate examination results in significantly greater student competence and confidence and their use should be considered in medical schools.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信