佛罗里达州医疗项目中患者对大麻污染的看法。

Q1 Medicine
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Pub Date : 2024-12-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000542929
Gabriel Spandau, Jamie Loizzo, Hannah Jury, James C Bunch, Nicole Stedman, Brian Pearson, Amie J Goodin
{"title":"佛罗里达州医疗项目中患者对大麻污染的看法。","authors":"Gabriel Spandau, Jamie Loizzo, Hannah Jury, James C Bunch, Nicole Stedman, Brian Pearson, Amie J Goodin","doi":"10.1159/000542929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As medical cannabis becomes more accessible, product quality must be evaluated. Researchers identified a social media community where Florida medical cannabis patients discuss personal experiences. The objective of this study was to analyze posts in this community to understand patient experience with products purchased from Florida medical dispensaries they believed to be contamination, perceptions of product quality, and desired changes to the Florida program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Social networking theory acted as the underlying framework, and we employed a qualitative case study design to identify mentions of possible contamination and understand patient perceptions of contamination and the Florida medical cannabis program from the Reddit community <i>FLMedicalTrees</i>. The lead researcher conducted a social media analysis of posts identified as containing discussions relevant to product contamination. Constant comparison methods were used to code data, arrive at themes, and maintain validity and reliability of interpretation of coded themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 300 post mentions of contamination, 98 posts were identified as relevant following review. Key results were as follows: (1) multiple mentions of possible contamination of products from medical cannabis dispensaries reported by Florida program patients; (2) patients sought second opinions when concerned about possible contamination and shared personal experiences as well as advice on what concerned patients should do if they believe they have contaminated products; (3) some patients expressed feelings of anxiety and worry about health, safety, and quality control, while others that described possible product contamination did not express concern; and (4) patients wanted changes regarding vertical integration, company accountability, state oversight, and home grow law.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical cannabis patients and providers could benefit from education on responding to possible contamination within medical cannabis products. Policymakers should consider these findings when setting regulations around contamination testing thresholds, dispensary oversight, and other regulations that directly impact patient safety, like allowing patients to see products before purchase.</p>","PeriodicalId":18415,"journal":{"name":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","volume":"8 1","pages":"15-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients' Perceptions of Cannabis Contamination in Florida's Medical Program.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Spandau, Jamie Loizzo, Hannah Jury, James C Bunch, Nicole Stedman, Brian Pearson, Amie J Goodin\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000542929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>As medical cannabis becomes more accessible, product quality must be evaluated. Researchers identified a social media community where Florida medical cannabis patients discuss personal experiences. The objective of this study was to analyze posts in this community to understand patient experience with products purchased from Florida medical dispensaries they believed to be contamination, perceptions of product quality, and desired changes to the Florida program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Social networking theory acted as the underlying framework, and we employed a qualitative case study design to identify mentions of possible contamination and understand patient perceptions of contamination and the Florida medical cannabis program from the Reddit community <i>FLMedicalTrees</i>. The lead researcher conducted a social media analysis of posts identified as containing discussions relevant to product contamination. Constant comparison methods were used to code data, arrive at themes, and maintain validity and reliability of interpretation of coded themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 300 post mentions of contamination, 98 posts were identified as relevant following review. Key results were as follows: (1) multiple mentions of possible contamination of products from medical cannabis dispensaries reported by Florida program patients; (2) patients sought second opinions when concerned about possible contamination and shared personal experiences as well as advice on what concerned patients should do if they believe they have contaminated products; (3) some patients expressed feelings of anxiety and worry about health, safety, and quality control, while others that described possible product contamination did not express concern; and (4) patients wanted changes regarding vertical integration, company accountability, state oversight, and home grow law.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medical cannabis patients and providers could benefit from education on responding to possible contamination within medical cannabis products. Policymakers should consider these findings when setting regulations around contamination testing thresholds, dispensary oversight, and other regulations that directly impact patient safety, like allowing patients to see products before purchase.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"15-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832188/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542929\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000542929","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:随着医用大麻越来越容易获得,必须对产品质量进行评估。研究人员发现了一个社交媒体社区,佛罗里达州的医用大麻患者在这里讨论个人经历。本研究的目的是分析该社区的职位,以了解患者对从佛罗里达州医疗药房购买的产品的体验,他们认为这些产品受到污染,对产品质量的看法,以及对佛罗里达州计划的期望改变。方法:社会网络理论作为基础框架,我们采用定性案例研究设计来识别可能的污染,并了解患者对污染的看法,以及来自Reddit社区FLMedicalTrees的佛罗里达州医用大麻计划。首席研究员对社交媒体上被确认包含与产品污染相关讨论的帖子进行了分析。采用持续比较的方法对数据进行编码,得出主题,并保持编码主题解释的有效性和可靠性。结果:在300个提及污染的帖子中,98个帖子在审查后被确定为相关。主要结果如下:(1)佛罗里达州计划患者报告的医用大麻药房产品可能受到污染的多次提及;(2)患者在担心可能受到污染时会寻求第二意见,并分享个人经历,以及如果患者认为自己接触了受污染的产品应采取的措施;(3)部分患者表达了对健康、安全和质量控制的焦虑和担忧,而其他描述可能的产品污染的患者没有表达担忧;(4)患者希望在垂直整合、公司责任、国家监督和家庭种植法方面做出改变。结论:对医用大麻患者和提供者进行教育,了解如何应对医用大麻产品中可能存在的污染,可以从中受益。政策制定者在制定污染检测阈值、药房监督和其他直接影响患者安全的法规(如允许患者在购买前查看产品)时,应考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patients' Perceptions of Cannabis Contamination in Florida's Medical Program.

Introduction: As medical cannabis becomes more accessible, product quality must be evaluated. Researchers identified a social media community where Florida medical cannabis patients discuss personal experiences. The objective of this study was to analyze posts in this community to understand patient experience with products purchased from Florida medical dispensaries they believed to be contamination, perceptions of product quality, and desired changes to the Florida program.

Methods: Social networking theory acted as the underlying framework, and we employed a qualitative case study design to identify mentions of possible contamination and understand patient perceptions of contamination and the Florida medical cannabis program from the Reddit community FLMedicalTrees. The lead researcher conducted a social media analysis of posts identified as containing discussions relevant to product contamination. Constant comparison methods were used to code data, arrive at themes, and maintain validity and reliability of interpretation of coded themes.

Results: Of 300 post mentions of contamination, 98 posts were identified as relevant following review. Key results were as follows: (1) multiple mentions of possible contamination of products from medical cannabis dispensaries reported by Florida program patients; (2) patients sought second opinions when concerned about possible contamination and shared personal experiences as well as advice on what concerned patients should do if they believe they have contaminated products; (3) some patients expressed feelings of anxiety and worry about health, safety, and quality control, while others that described possible product contamination did not express concern; and (4) patients wanted changes regarding vertical integration, company accountability, state oversight, and home grow law.

Conclusions: Medical cannabis patients and providers could benefit from education on responding to possible contamination within medical cannabis products. Policymakers should consider these findings when setting regulations around contamination testing thresholds, dispensary oversight, and other regulations that directly impact patient safety, like allowing patients to see products before purchase.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids
Medical Cannabis and Cannabinoids Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信