阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的时间动态和生物学变异性。

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jihwan Yun, Daeun Shin, Eun Hye Lee, Jun Pyo Kim, Hongki Ham, Yuna Gu, Min Young Chun, Sung Hoon Kang, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Chi-Hun Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Si Eun Kim, Yeshin Kim, Jaeho Kim, Na-Yeon Jung, Yeo Jin Kim, Soo Hyun Cho, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz, Nicholas J Ashton, Joseph Therriault, Nesrine Rahmouni, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Michael W Weiner, Sang Won Seo, Hyemin Jang
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的时间动态和生物学变异性。","authors":"Jihwan Yun, Daeun Shin, Eun Hye Lee, Jun Pyo Kim, Hongki Ham, Yuna Gu, Min Young Chun, Sung Hoon Kang, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Chi-Hun Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Si Eun Kim, Yeshin Kim, Jaeho Kim, Na-Yeon Jung, Yeo Jin Kim, Soo Hyun Cho, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz, Nicholas J Ashton, Joseph Therriault, Nesrine Rahmouni, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Michael W Weiner, Sang Won Seo, Hyemin Jang","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding the characteristics of discordance between plasma biomarkers and positron emission tomography (PET) results in Alzheimer disease (AD) is crucial for accurate interpretation of the findings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare (1) medical comorbidities affecting plasma biomarker concentrations, (2) imaging and clinical features, and (3) cognitive changes between plasma biomarker and PET discordant and concordant cases.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter cohort study, conducted between 2016 and 2023, included individuals with unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer-type dementia, who had both amyloid β (Aβ) PET imaging and plasma biomarkers. A subset of participants also underwent tau PET imaging.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their plasma and PET biomarker results: plasma-/PET-, plasma+/PET-, plasma-/PET+, and plasma+/PET+.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Clinical characteristics were compared between the 4 groups, focusing on the discordant groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2611 participants (mean [SD] age was 71.2 [8.7] years; 1656 female [63.4%]), of whom 124 additionally underwent tau PET, were included. Among the plasma biomarkers, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 exhibited the highest concordance rate with Aβ (2326 of 2571 [90.5%]) and tau (100 of 120 [83.3%]) PET. The p-tau217+/Aβ PET- group was older (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.2] years vs 70.0 [8.8] years; P < .001) with a higher prevalence of hypertension (56 of 152 [36.8%] vs 266 of 1073 [25.0%]), diabetes (40 of 152 [26.3%] vs 156 of 1059 [14.7%]), and chronic kidney disease (17 of 152 [11.2%] vs 21 of 1073 [2.0%]) compared with the p-tau217-/Aβ PET- group (P < .001 for all). Body mass index was higher in p-tau217-/Aβ PET+ than in p-tau217+/Aβ PET+ (mean [SD], 24.1 [2.8] vs 23.1 [3.1], respectively; P = .001; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). The p-tau217+/Aβ PET- group had lower hippocampal volume (mean [SD], 2555.4 [576.9] vs 2979.1 [545.8]; P < .001) and worse clinical trajectory compared with p-tau217-/Aβ PET- (β = -0.53; P < .001). In contrast, tau PET discordant cases did not show significant differences in medical comorbidities or clinical outcomes compared with the p-tau217-/tau PET- group. Only the p-tau 217+/tau PET+ group demonstrated faster cognitive deterioration compared with the p-tau 217-/tau PET- group (β = -1.66; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this cohort study suggest that the mechanisms underlying the discordance between plasma biomarkers and PET findings may be multifaceted, underscoring the need to consider the temporal dynamics and biological variability of plasma biomarkers.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833660/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Dynamics and Biological Variability of Alzheimer Biomarkers.\",\"authors\":\"Jihwan Yun, Daeun Shin, Eun Hye Lee, Jun Pyo Kim, Hongki Ham, Yuna Gu, Min Young Chun, Sung Hoon Kang, Hee Jin Kim, Duk L Na, Chi-Hun Kim, Ko Woon Kim, Si Eun Kim, Yeshin Kim, Jaeho Kim, Na-Yeon Jung, Yeo Jin Kim, Soo Hyun Cho, Henrik Zetterberg, Kaj Blennow, Fernando Gonzalez-Ortiz, Nicholas J Ashton, Joseph Therriault, Nesrine Rahmouni, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Michael W Weiner, Sang Won Seo, Hyemin Jang\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Understanding the characteristics of discordance between plasma biomarkers and positron emission tomography (PET) results in Alzheimer disease (AD) is crucial for accurate interpretation of the findings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare (1) medical comorbidities affecting plasma biomarker concentrations, (2) imaging and clinical features, and (3) cognitive changes between plasma biomarker and PET discordant and concordant cases.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This multicenter cohort study, conducted between 2016 and 2023, included individuals with unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer-type dementia, who had both amyloid β (Aβ) PET imaging and plasma biomarkers. A subset of participants also underwent tau PET imaging.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their plasma and PET biomarker results: plasma-/PET-, plasma+/PET-, plasma-/PET+, and plasma+/PET+.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Clinical characteristics were compared between the 4 groups, focusing on the discordant groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2611 participants (mean [SD] age was 71.2 [8.7] years; 1656 female [63.4%]), of whom 124 additionally underwent tau PET, were included. Among the plasma biomarkers, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 exhibited the highest concordance rate with Aβ (2326 of 2571 [90.5%]) and tau (100 of 120 [83.3%]) PET. The p-tau217+/Aβ PET- group was older (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.2] years vs 70.0 [8.8] years; P < .001) with a higher prevalence of hypertension (56 of 152 [36.8%] vs 266 of 1073 [25.0%]), diabetes (40 of 152 [26.3%] vs 156 of 1059 [14.7%]), and chronic kidney disease (17 of 152 [11.2%] vs 21 of 1073 [2.0%]) compared with the p-tau217-/Aβ PET- group (P < .001 for all). Body mass index was higher in p-tau217-/Aβ PET+ than in p-tau217+/Aβ PET+ (mean [SD], 24.1 [2.8] vs 23.1 [3.1], respectively; P = .001; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). The p-tau217+/Aβ PET- group had lower hippocampal volume (mean [SD], 2555.4 [576.9] vs 2979.1 [545.8]; P < .001) and worse clinical trajectory compared with p-tau217-/Aβ PET- (β = -0.53; P < .001). In contrast, tau PET discordant cases did not show significant differences in medical comorbidities or clinical outcomes compared with the p-tau217-/tau PET- group. Only the p-tau 217+/tau PET+ group demonstrated faster cognitive deterioration compared with the p-tau 217-/tau PET- group (β = -1.66; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>Results of this cohort study suggest that the mechanisms underlying the discordance between plasma biomarkers and PET findings may be multifaceted, underscoring the need to consider the temporal dynamics and biological variability of plasma biomarkers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11833660/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5263\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.5263","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:了解血浆生物标志物与正电子发射断层扫描(PET)结果在阿尔茨海默病(AD)中的不一致特征对于准确解释研究结果至关重要。目的:比较(1)影响血浆生物标志物浓度的医学合并症;(2)影像学和临床特征;(3)血浆生物标志物与PET不一致和一致病例的认知变化。设计、环境和参与者:这项多中心队列研究于2016年至2023年进行,纳入了具有β淀粉样蛋白(Aβ) PET成像和血浆生物标志物的未受损认知、轻度认知障碍或阿尔茨海默型痴呆的个体。一部分参与者也接受了tau PET成像。暴露:参与者根据其血浆和PET生物标志物结果分为4组:血浆-/PET-、血浆+/PET-、血浆-/PET+和血浆+/PET+。主要观察指标:比较4组患者的临床特征,重点比较不一致组。结果:共有2611名参与者(平均[SD]年龄为71.2[8.7]岁;1656名女性[63.4%]),其中124名另外接受了tau PET。在血浆生物标志物中,磷酸化tau (p-tau) 217与Aβ(2571 / 90.5%)和tau (120 / 83.3%) PET的一致性率最高。p-tau217+/Aβ PET-组年龄较大(平均[SD]年龄,75.8[7.2]岁vs 70.0[8.8]岁;结论和相关性:这项队列研究的结果表明,血浆生物标志物与PET结果之间不一致的机制可能是多方面的,强调需要考虑血浆生物标志物的时间动态和生物学变异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal Dynamics and Biological Variability of Alzheimer Biomarkers.

Importance: Understanding the characteristics of discordance between plasma biomarkers and positron emission tomography (PET) results in Alzheimer disease (AD) is crucial for accurate interpretation of the findings.

Objective: To compare (1) medical comorbidities affecting plasma biomarker concentrations, (2) imaging and clinical features, and (3) cognitive changes between plasma biomarker and PET discordant and concordant cases.

Design, setting, and participants: This multicenter cohort study, conducted between 2016 and 2023, included individuals with unimpaired cognition, mild cognitive impairment, or Alzheimer-type dementia, who had both amyloid β (Aβ) PET imaging and plasma biomarkers. A subset of participants also underwent tau PET imaging.

Exposures: Participants were categorized into 4 groups based on their plasma and PET biomarker results: plasma-/PET-, plasma+/PET-, plasma-/PET+, and plasma+/PET+.

Main outcomes and measures: Clinical characteristics were compared between the 4 groups, focusing on the discordant groups.

Results: A total of 2611 participants (mean [SD] age was 71.2 [8.7] years; 1656 female [63.4%]), of whom 124 additionally underwent tau PET, were included. Among the plasma biomarkers, phosphorylated tau (p-tau) 217 exhibited the highest concordance rate with Aβ (2326 of 2571 [90.5%]) and tau (100 of 120 [83.3%]) PET. The p-tau217+/Aβ PET- group was older (mean [SD] age, 75.8 [7.2] years vs 70.0 [8.8] years; P < .001) with a higher prevalence of hypertension (56 of 152 [36.8%] vs 266 of 1073 [25.0%]), diabetes (40 of 152 [26.3%] vs 156 of 1059 [14.7%]), and chronic kidney disease (17 of 152 [11.2%] vs 21 of 1073 [2.0%]) compared with the p-tau217-/Aβ PET- group (P < .001 for all). Body mass index was higher in p-tau217-/Aβ PET+ than in p-tau217+/Aβ PET+ (mean [SD], 24.1 [2.8] vs 23.1 [3.1], respectively; P = .001; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared). The p-tau217+/Aβ PET- group had lower hippocampal volume (mean [SD], 2555.4 [576.9] vs 2979.1 [545.8]; P < .001) and worse clinical trajectory compared with p-tau217-/Aβ PET- (β = -0.53; P < .001). In contrast, tau PET discordant cases did not show significant differences in medical comorbidities or clinical outcomes compared with the p-tau217-/tau PET- group. Only the p-tau 217+/tau PET+ group demonstrated faster cognitive deterioration compared with the p-tau 217-/tau PET- group (β = -1.66; P < .001).

Conclusions and relevance: Results of this cohort study suggest that the mechanisms underlying the discordance between plasma biomarkers and PET findings may be multifaceted, underscoring the need to consider the temporal dynamics and biological variability of plasma biomarkers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信