新生儿使用McGrath®MAC视频喉镜气管插管的合适样式:一项随机交叉模拟研究。

IF 0.8 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Katsuhide Masui, Naoyuki Tsunoda, Ayaka Ito, Takashi Asai
{"title":"新生儿使用McGrath®MAC视频喉镜气管插管的合适样式:一项随机交叉模拟研究。","authors":"Katsuhide Masui, Naoyuki Tsunoda, Ayaka Ito, Takashi Asai","doi":"10.1186/s40981-025-00772-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines on airway management in neonates and infants recommend using a stylet when a videolaryngoscope is used, but it is not clear if the use of a stylet facilitates tracheal intubation and which shape of the stylet is suitable in neonates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a preliminary simulation study of a randomized controlled cross-over design, 25 anesthesiologists (3 specialists, 11 senior residents, and 11 junior residents) used a McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope (Covidien, Medtronic, Tokyo, Japan) blade 1 for tracheal intubation (of a 3.5-mm ID Shiley™ tube with a cuff), with one of four differently shaped stylets (C-shaped, J-shaped, hockey stick-shaped and double C-shaped) or without a stylet in a manikin of a neonate, and compared intubation times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with intubation time without the use of a stylet, intubation time was significantly longer with the use of the J-shaped stylet (P = 0.007; median (95% CI) difference: 2 (1 to 2) s) or with the hockey stick-shaped stylet (P = 0.0002; median (95% CI) difference: 9 (9 to 10) s). In contrast, intubation time was similar between no stylet and the C-shaped stylet (P = 0.90; median (95% CI) difference: 0 (0 to 0) s) or between no stylet and the double C-shaped style (P = 0.60; median (95% CI) difference: 0 (0 to 0) s).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, while time to tracheal intubation would be similar with and without the use of a stylet, the shape of the stylet would affect intubation time in neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":14635,"journal":{"name":"JA Clinical Reports","volume":"11 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832964/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Appropriate shape of a stylet for tracheal intubation using the McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope in neonates: a randomized crossover simulation study.\",\"authors\":\"Katsuhide Masui, Naoyuki Tsunoda, Ayaka Ito, Takashi Asai\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40981-025-00772-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Guidelines on airway management in neonates and infants recommend using a stylet when a videolaryngoscope is used, but it is not clear if the use of a stylet facilitates tracheal intubation and which shape of the stylet is suitable in neonates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As a preliminary simulation study of a randomized controlled cross-over design, 25 anesthesiologists (3 specialists, 11 senior residents, and 11 junior residents) used a McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope (Covidien, Medtronic, Tokyo, Japan) blade 1 for tracheal intubation (of a 3.5-mm ID Shiley™ tube with a cuff), with one of four differently shaped stylets (C-shaped, J-shaped, hockey stick-shaped and double C-shaped) or without a stylet in a manikin of a neonate, and compared intubation times.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with intubation time without the use of a stylet, intubation time was significantly longer with the use of the J-shaped stylet (P = 0.007; median (95% CI) difference: 2 (1 to 2) s) or with the hockey stick-shaped stylet (P = 0.0002; median (95% CI) difference: 9 (9 to 10) s). In contrast, intubation time was similar between no stylet and the C-shaped stylet (P = 0.90; median (95% CI) difference: 0 (0 to 0) s) or between no stylet and the double C-shaped style (P = 0.60; median (95% CI) difference: 0 (0 to 0) s).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, while time to tracheal intubation would be similar with and without the use of a stylet, the shape of the stylet would affect intubation time in neonates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JA Clinical Reports\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11832964/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JA Clinical Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-025-00772-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JA Clinical Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-025-00772-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新生儿和婴儿气道管理指南建议在使用视频喉镜时使用气管导管,但尚不清楚气管导管的使用是否有助于气管插管,以及哪种形状的气管导管适合新生儿。方法:作为随机对照交叉设计的初步模拟研究,25名麻醉师(3名专家,11名高级住院医师和11名初级住院医师)使用McGrath®MAC视频喉镜(Covidien, Medtronic, Tokyo, Japan)叶片1进行气管插管(3.5 mm ID Shiley™管带袖口),四种不同形状的导管(c形,j形,曲棍球棒形和双c形)之一或不带导管的新生儿模型插管,并比较插管时间。结果:与未使用导针插管时间相比,使用j型导针插管时间明显延长(P = 0.007;中位数(95% CI)差异:2(1至2)s)或与曲棍球棒状柱头(P = 0.0002;中位数(95% CI)差值为9 (9 ~ 10)s)。相比之下,插管时间在无导管柱和c型导管柱之间相似(P = 0.90;中位数(95% CI)差异:0(0至0)s)或无柱头与双c形柱头之间(P = 0.60;中位数(95% CI)差为0 (0 ~ 0)s)。结论:使用和不使用气管插管管柱的插管时间相似,但气管插管管柱的形状会影响新生儿插管时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Appropriate shape of a stylet for tracheal intubation using the McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope in neonates: a randomized crossover simulation study.

Background: Guidelines on airway management in neonates and infants recommend using a stylet when a videolaryngoscope is used, but it is not clear if the use of a stylet facilitates tracheal intubation and which shape of the stylet is suitable in neonates.

Methods: As a preliminary simulation study of a randomized controlled cross-over design, 25 anesthesiologists (3 specialists, 11 senior residents, and 11 junior residents) used a McGrath® MAC videolaryngoscope (Covidien, Medtronic, Tokyo, Japan) blade 1 for tracheal intubation (of a 3.5-mm ID Shiley™ tube with a cuff), with one of four differently shaped stylets (C-shaped, J-shaped, hockey stick-shaped and double C-shaped) or without a stylet in a manikin of a neonate, and compared intubation times.

Results: Compared with intubation time without the use of a stylet, intubation time was significantly longer with the use of the J-shaped stylet (P = 0.007; median (95% CI) difference: 2 (1 to 2) s) or with the hockey stick-shaped stylet (P = 0.0002; median (95% CI) difference: 9 (9 to 10) s). In contrast, intubation time was similar between no stylet and the C-shaped stylet (P = 0.90; median (95% CI) difference: 0 (0 to 0) s) or between no stylet and the double C-shaped style (P = 0.60; median (95% CI) difference: 0 (0 to 0) s).

Conclusions: In conclusion, while time to tracheal intubation would be similar with and without the use of a stylet, the shape of the stylet would affect intubation time in neonates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JA Clinical Reports
JA Clinical Reports ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: JA Clinical Reports is a companion journal to the Journal of Anesthesia (JA), the official journal of the Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists (JSA). This journal is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal related to clinical anesthesia practices such as anesthesia management, pain management and intensive care. Case reports are very important articles from the viewpoint of education and the cultivation of scientific thinking in the field of anesthesia. However, submissions of anesthesia research and clinical reports from Japan are notably decreasing in major anesthesia journals. Therefore, the JSA has decided to launch a new journal, JA Clinical Reports, to encourage JSA members, particularly junior Japanese anesthesiologists, to publish papers in English language.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信