{"title":"住院患者中心静脉相关血流感染(CLABSI)的种族差异:一项风险调整分析","authors":"Sandeep Tripathi, Taylor Walter, Jeremy McGarvey","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk and exposure-adjusted central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates between racial and ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>15 network hospitals in Illinois and Michigan (Part of OSF HealthCare).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients of all age groups who had a central line inserted and removed during the same hospitalization between 01/2018 and 06/2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CLABSI rates/1000 Central line days of the four major racial and ethnic categories (Hispanic, non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], and non-Hispanic others) were analyzed by generalized Poisson regression. Confounding variables included in the regression model based on a directed acyclic graph and included age group, insurance class, language, ICU admission, diagnostic cohorts (obesity, diabetes, dialysis, cancer, neutropenia), and line usage (blood products, chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27,674 central lines (244,889 catheter days) on 23,133 unique patients (median age 64 years, 8% pediatric patients) were included in the analysis. Overall, the CLABSI rate was 1.070/1000 Central line days. 76% of the study population was NHW, 17% NHB, and 4% Hispanic. After adjusting for confounding variables, Hispanic patients had higher CLABSI rates than NHW (IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.15-3.10, <i>P</i> = .013). No significant difference was observed in the CLABSI rates between NHW and NHB patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities in hospital-associated conditions persist even after controlling for patient-level risk factors and exposures, with Hispanic patients at the highest risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Racial and ethnic disparities in central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in hospitalized patients: a risk-adjusted analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sandeep Tripathi, Taylor Walter, Jeremy McGarvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2025.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the risk and exposure-adjusted central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates between racial and ethnic groups.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>15 network hospitals in Illinois and Michigan (Part of OSF HealthCare).</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients of all age groups who had a central line inserted and removed during the same hospitalization between 01/2018 and 06/2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CLABSI rates/1000 Central line days of the four major racial and ethnic categories (Hispanic, non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], and non-Hispanic others) were analyzed by generalized Poisson regression. Confounding variables included in the regression model based on a directed acyclic graph and included age group, insurance class, language, ICU admission, diagnostic cohorts (obesity, diabetes, dialysis, cancer, neutropenia), and line usage (blood products, chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>27,674 central lines (244,889 catheter days) on 23,133 unique patients (median age 64 years, 8% pediatric patients) were included in the analysis. Overall, the CLABSI rate was 1.070/1000 Central line days. 76% of the study population was NHW, 17% NHB, and 4% Hispanic. After adjusting for confounding variables, Hispanic patients had higher CLABSI rates than NHW (IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.15-3.10, <i>P</i> = .013). No significant difference was observed in the CLABSI rates between NHW and NHB patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Disparities in hospital-associated conditions persist even after controlling for patient-level risk factors and exposures, with Hispanic patients at the highest risk.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:比较不同种族和民族人群的风险和暴露调整中心线相关血流感染(CLABSI)率。设计:回顾性队列研究。环境:伊利诺伊州和密歇根州的15家网络医院(OSF HealthCare的一部分)。患者:2018年1月1日至2023年6月同一住院期间插入和取出中心静脉导管的所有年龄组患者。方法:采用广义泊松回归分析四种主要种族和族裔类别(西班牙裔、非西班牙裔白人[NHW]、非西班牙裔黑人[NHB]和非西班牙裔其他)的CLABSI率/1000中心线日。基于有向无环图的回归模型中包含的混杂变量包括年龄组、保险类别、语言、ICU入院、诊断队列(肥胖、糖尿病、透析、癌症、中性粒细胞减少症)和药物使用(血液制品、化疗、全肠外营养)。结果:分析纳入了23133例独特患者(中位年龄64岁,8%为儿科患者)的27,674条中心静脉(244,889个导管日)。总体而言,CLABSI汇率为1.070/1000中线日。76%的研究人群为NHW, 17%为NHB, 4%为西班牙裔。在调整混杂变量后,西班牙裔患者的CLABSI发生率高于非西班牙裔患者(IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.15-3.10, P = 0.013)。NHW和NHB患者的CLABSI发生率无显著差异。结论:即使在控制了患者水平的风险因素和暴露后,医院相关疾病的差异仍然存在,西班牙裔患者的风险最高。
Racial and ethnic disparities in central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) in hospitalized patients: a risk-adjusted analysis.
Objective: To compare the risk and exposure-adjusted central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates between racial and ethnic groups.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: 15 network hospitals in Illinois and Michigan (Part of OSF HealthCare).
Patients: Patients of all age groups who had a central line inserted and removed during the same hospitalization between 01/2018 and 06/2023.
Methods: CLABSI rates/1000 Central line days of the four major racial and ethnic categories (Hispanic, non-Hispanic White [NHW], non-Hispanic Black [NHB], and non-Hispanic others) were analyzed by generalized Poisson regression. Confounding variables included in the regression model based on a directed acyclic graph and included age group, insurance class, language, ICU admission, diagnostic cohorts (obesity, diabetes, dialysis, cancer, neutropenia), and line usage (blood products, chemotherapy, total parenteral nutrition).
Results: 27,674 central lines (244,889 catheter days) on 23,133 unique patients (median age 64 years, 8% pediatric patients) were included in the analysis. Overall, the CLABSI rate was 1.070/1000 Central line days. 76% of the study population was NHW, 17% NHB, and 4% Hispanic. After adjusting for confounding variables, Hispanic patients had higher CLABSI rates than NHW (IRR 1.89, 95% CI 1.15-3.10, P = .013). No significant difference was observed in the CLABSI rates between NHW and NHB patients.
Conclusion: Disparities in hospital-associated conditions persist even after controlling for patient-level risk factors and exposures, with Hispanic patients at the highest risk.
期刊介绍:
Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.