心衰患者反复非计划住院的原因和预测因素:一项队列研究:评论

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Yonathan Freund, Gad Cotter, Beth Davison, Oscar Mirò
{"title":"心衰患者反复非计划住院的原因和预测因素:一项队列研究:评论","authors":"Yonathan Freund, Gad Cotter, Beth Davison, Oscar Mirò","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-03891-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We read with great interest the article authored by Kalter-Leibovici et al. Initial treatment in acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial in shaping short-term outcomes. Administered in the prehospital phase or emergency department (ED), early interventions-such as timing and dose of intravenous diuretics or vasodilators-may impact stabilization and decongestion. However, most predictive models, including the one discussed here, often omit these parameters, potentially missing an opportunity to refine risk stratification and anticipate complications.Beyond the ED, in-hospital treatment remains critical. The STRONG-HF trial demonstrated that intensifying medical therapy during hospitalization improves post-discharge outcomes, yet readmission rates remain high. This raises questions about the endpoint itself-whether it fully captures the benefits of optimized early care-or whether it reflects the inherent complexity of AHF as a progressive disease. Most ED-based studies focus on short- to mid-term readmissions (30-90 days), overlooking longer-term trajectories.Additionally, biomarkers such as NT-proBNP and renal function indicators, alongside advanced risk stratification tools, could enhance therapy guidance and discharge decisions. Yet, they remain underutilized in predictive models. Incorporating these parameters in future analyses may provide more actionable insights and improve long-term care strategies for AHF patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Causes and predictors of recurrent unplanned hospital admissions in heart failure patients: a cohort study: a comment.\",\"authors\":\"Yonathan Freund, Gad Cotter, Beth Davison, Oscar Mirò\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-03891-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We read with great interest the article authored by Kalter-Leibovici et al. Initial treatment in acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial in shaping short-term outcomes. Administered in the prehospital phase or emergency department (ED), early interventions-such as timing and dose of intravenous diuretics or vasodilators-may impact stabilization and decongestion. However, most predictive models, including the one discussed here, often omit these parameters, potentially missing an opportunity to refine risk stratification and anticipate complications.Beyond the ED, in-hospital treatment remains critical. The STRONG-HF trial demonstrated that intensifying medical therapy during hospitalization improves post-discharge outcomes, yet readmission rates remain high. This raises questions about the endpoint itself-whether it fully captures the benefits of optimized early care-or whether it reflects the inherent complexity of AHF as a progressive disease. Most ED-based studies focus on short- to mid-term readmissions (30-90 days), overlooking longer-term trajectories.Additionally, biomarkers such as NT-proBNP and renal function indicators, alongside advanced risk stratification tools, could enhance therapy guidance and discharge decisions. Yet, they remain underutilized in predictive models. Incorporating these parameters in future analyses may provide more actionable insights and improve long-term care strategies for AHF patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03891-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-03891-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Kalter-Leibovici等人的文章。急性心力衰竭(AHF)的初始治疗对形成短期结果至关重要。在院前阶段或急诊科(ED)进行早期干预,如静脉利尿剂或血管扩张剂的时间和剂量,可能会影响稳定和去充血。然而,大多数预测模型,包括这里讨论的模型,经常忽略这些参数,潜在地失去了改进风险分层和预测并发症的机会。在急诊室之外,住院治疗仍然至关重要。STRONG-HF试验表明,住院期间加强药物治疗可改善出院后的预后,但再入院率仍然很高。这就提出了关于终点本身的问题——它是否充分体现了优化早期护理的好处——或者它是否反映了AHF作为一种进行性疾病的内在复杂性。大多数基于教育的研究侧重于短期到中期的再入院(30-90天),忽视了长期的轨迹。此外,NT-proBNP和肾功能指标等生物标志物,以及先进的风险分层工具,可以增强治疗指导和出院决策。然而,它们在预测模型中仍未得到充分利用。将这些参数纳入未来的分析可能会提供更多可操作的见解,并改善AHF患者的长期护理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Causes and predictors of recurrent unplanned hospital admissions in heart failure patients: a cohort study: a comment.

We read with great interest the article authored by Kalter-Leibovici et al. Initial treatment in acute heart failure (AHF) is crucial in shaping short-term outcomes. Administered in the prehospital phase or emergency department (ED), early interventions-such as timing and dose of intravenous diuretics or vasodilators-may impact stabilization and decongestion. However, most predictive models, including the one discussed here, often omit these parameters, potentially missing an opportunity to refine risk stratification and anticipate complications.Beyond the ED, in-hospital treatment remains critical. The STRONG-HF trial demonstrated that intensifying medical therapy during hospitalization improves post-discharge outcomes, yet readmission rates remain high. This raises questions about the endpoint itself-whether it fully captures the benefits of optimized early care-or whether it reflects the inherent complexity of AHF as a progressive disease. Most ED-based studies focus on short- to mid-term readmissions (30-90 days), overlooking longer-term trajectories.Additionally, biomarkers such as NT-proBNP and renal function indicators, alongside advanced risk stratification tools, could enhance therapy guidance and discharge decisions. Yet, they remain underutilized in predictive models. Incorporating these parameters in future analyses may provide more actionable insights and improve long-term care strategies for AHF patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信