隐喻如何促进健康交流:干眼症的案例。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Carina Rasse, Sandra Diehl, Ralf Terlutter
{"title":"隐喻如何促进健康交流:干眼症的案例。","authors":"Carina Rasse, Sandra Diehl, Ralf Terlutter","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2464304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous studies have investigated the effects of metaphors in health communication. Yet, relatively little attention has been given to variations in metaphor usage when people talk about a particular disease, and what functions these metaphors may have in different communication contexts. The aim of this paper is to study the effects of metaphors in the communication of Dry Eye Syndrome (DES), which has developed into a prevalent eye disease. A systematic metaphor analysis was applied to 15 extensive blog entries and 308 survey responses which reflect people's first-hand experiences on having dry eyes. The results showed that communication about DES is highly metaphorical and that metaphors vary in terms of underlying concepts (i.e., journey, war) and in their level of creativity in different communication contexts. When patients talk about treatments and experiences with doctors and about quality of life, conventional metaphors are overrepresented and patients often use metaphors related to a journey. When they talk about symptoms, creative metaphors are overrepresented and patients often refer to eyes/vision as objects. Paying attention to these variations provides deeper insights into how people experience and deal with DES. In a follow-up study, we asked DES patients (<i>n</i> = 66) which metaphors they consider particularly appropriate to describe their experience with DES. We found that personification and war-related metaphors got the highest appropriateness-ratings. Concluding, we discuss how the attention to metaphors might contribute to a more effective communication of DES in different communication contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Metaphors May Enhance Health Communication: The Case of Dry Eye Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Carina Rasse, Sandra Diehl, Ralf Terlutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10410236.2025.2464304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous studies have investigated the effects of metaphors in health communication. Yet, relatively little attention has been given to variations in metaphor usage when people talk about a particular disease, and what functions these metaphors may have in different communication contexts. The aim of this paper is to study the effects of metaphors in the communication of Dry Eye Syndrome (DES), which has developed into a prevalent eye disease. A systematic metaphor analysis was applied to 15 extensive blog entries and 308 survey responses which reflect people's first-hand experiences on having dry eyes. The results showed that communication about DES is highly metaphorical and that metaphors vary in terms of underlying concepts (i.e., journey, war) and in their level of creativity in different communication contexts. When patients talk about treatments and experiences with doctors and about quality of life, conventional metaphors are overrepresented and patients often use metaphors related to a journey. When they talk about symptoms, creative metaphors are overrepresented and patients often refer to eyes/vision as objects. Paying attention to these variations provides deeper insights into how people experience and deal with DES. In a follow-up study, we asked DES patients (<i>n</i> = 66) which metaphors they consider particularly appropriate to describe their experience with DES. We found that personification and war-related metaphors got the highest appropriateness-ratings. Concluding, we discuss how the attention to metaphors might contribute to a more effective communication of DES in different communication contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12889,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Communication\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2464304\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2464304","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的研究调查了隐喻在健康沟通中的作用。然而,相对较少的关注是,当人们谈论一种特定疾病时,隐喻使用的变化,以及这些隐喻在不同的交流环境中可能具有的功能。干眼症已成为一种常见的眼病,本文旨在探讨隐喻在干眼症交际中的作用。本文采用系统的隐喻分析方法,对15篇广泛的博客文章和308份反映人们对眼睛干涩的第一手体验的调查反馈进行了分析。结果表明,关于DES的交际具有高度的隐喻性,在不同的交际语境中,隐喻在潜在概念(如旅行、战争)和创造性水平上存在差异。当病人谈论治疗和与医生的经历以及生活质量时,传统的隐喻被过度使用,病人经常使用与旅行有关的隐喻。当他们谈论症状时,创造性的隐喻被过度使用,患者通常将眼睛/视觉称为物体。关注这些变化可以更深入地了解人们如何体验和处理DES。在一项后续研究中,我们询问DES患者(n = 66)他们认为哪些隐喻特别适合描述他们的DES体验。我们发现拟人化和与战争有关的隐喻获得了最高的适当评级。最后,我们讨论了对隐喻的关注如何有助于在不同的交际语境中更有效地传播DES。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Metaphors May Enhance Health Communication: The Case of Dry Eye Syndrome.

Previous studies have investigated the effects of metaphors in health communication. Yet, relatively little attention has been given to variations in metaphor usage when people talk about a particular disease, and what functions these metaphors may have in different communication contexts. The aim of this paper is to study the effects of metaphors in the communication of Dry Eye Syndrome (DES), which has developed into a prevalent eye disease. A systematic metaphor analysis was applied to 15 extensive blog entries and 308 survey responses which reflect people's first-hand experiences on having dry eyes. The results showed that communication about DES is highly metaphorical and that metaphors vary in terms of underlying concepts (i.e., journey, war) and in their level of creativity in different communication contexts. When patients talk about treatments and experiences with doctors and about quality of life, conventional metaphors are overrepresented and patients often use metaphors related to a journey. When they talk about symptoms, creative metaphors are overrepresented and patients often refer to eyes/vision as objects. Paying attention to these variations provides deeper insights into how people experience and deal with DES. In a follow-up study, we asked DES patients (n = 66) which metaphors they consider particularly appropriate to describe their experience with DES. We found that personification and war-related metaphors got the highest appropriateness-ratings. Concluding, we discuss how the attention to metaphors might contribute to a more effective communication of DES in different communication contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信