基于机器学习的分类算法的外部验证,用于心包转复心房颤动患者的动态心律诊断,使用智能手机光容积脉搏图:SMARTBEATS-ALGO研究。

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2025-03-28 DOI:10.1093/europace/euaf031
Jonatan Fernstad, Emma Svennberg, Peter Åberg, Katrin Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Anders Jansson, Johan Engdahl
{"title":"基于机器学习的分类算法的外部验证,用于心包转复心房颤动患者的动态心律诊断,使用智能手机光容积脉搏图:SMARTBEATS-ALGO研究。","authors":"Jonatan Fernstad, Emma Svennberg, Peter Åberg, Katrin Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Anders Jansson, Johan Engdahl","doi":"10.1093/europace/euaf031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to perform an external validation of an automatic machine learning (ML) algorithm for heart rhythm diagnostics using smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) recorded by patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) pericardioversion in an unsupervised ambulatory setting.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients undergoing cardioversion for AF or AFL performed 1-min heart rhythm recordings pericardioversion at least twice daily for 4-6 weeks, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running a PPG application (CORAI Heart Monitor) simultaneously with a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording (KardiaMobile). The algorithm uses support vector machines to classify heart rhythm from smartphone-PPG. The algorithm was trained on PPG recordings made by patients in a separate cardioversion cohort. Photoplethysmography recordings in the external validation cohort were analysed by the algorithm. Diagnostic performance was calculated by comparing the heart rhythm classification output to the diagnosis from the simultaneous ECG recordings (gold standard). In total, 460 patients performed 34 097 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings, divided into 180 patients with 16 092 recordings in the training cohort and 280 patients with 18 005 recordings in the external validation cohort. Algorithmic classification of the PPG recordings in the external validation cohort diagnosed AF with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.7%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively, and AF/AFL with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.3%, 99.1% and 99.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A machine learning-based algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in diagnosing atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from smartphone-PPG recordings in an unsupervised ambulatory setting, minimizing the need for manual review and ECG verification, in elderly cardioversion populations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04300270.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965787/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"External validation of a machine learning-based classification algorithm for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics in pericardioversion atrial fibrillation patients using smartphone photoplethysmography: the SMARTBEATS-ALGO study.\",\"authors\":\"Jonatan Fernstad, Emma Svennberg, Peter Åberg, Katrin Kemp Gudmundsdottir, Anders Jansson, Johan Engdahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/europace/euaf031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to perform an external validation of an automatic machine learning (ML) algorithm for heart rhythm diagnostics using smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) recorded by patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) pericardioversion in an unsupervised ambulatory setting.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients undergoing cardioversion for AF or AFL performed 1-min heart rhythm recordings pericardioversion at least twice daily for 4-6 weeks, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running a PPG application (CORAI Heart Monitor) simultaneously with a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording (KardiaMobile). The algorithm uses support vector machines to classify heart rhythm from smartphone-PPG. The algorithm was trained on PPG recordings made by patients in a separate cardioversion cohort. Photoplethysmography recordings in the external validation cohort were analysed by the algorithm. Diagnostic performance was calculated by comparing the heart rhythm classification output to the diagnosis from the simultaneous ECG recordings (gold standard). In total, 460 patients performed 34 097 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings, divided into 180 patients with 16 092 recordings in the training cohort and 280 patients with 18 005 recordings in the external validation cohort. Algorithmic classification of the PPG recordings in the external validation cohort diagnosed AF with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.7%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively, and AF/AFL with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.3%, 99.1% and 99.2%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A machine learning-based algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in diagnosing atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from smartphone-PPG recordings in an unsupervised ambulatory setting, minimizing the need for manual review and ECG verification, in elderly cardioversion populations.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04300270.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europace\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11965787/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europace\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euaf031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是在无监督的动态环境下,利用智能手机光容积脉搏波(PPG)记录心房颤动(AF)和心房扑动(AFL)心包转复患者的心律诊断,对自动机器学习算法进行外部验证。方法和结果:接受房颤或AFL复律的患者在复律期间每天至少两次进行1分钟心律记录,持续4-6周,使用运行PPG应用程序(CORAI心脏监视器)的iPhone 7智能手机同时进行单导联心电图记录(KardiaMobile)。该算法使用支持向量机(SVM)对智能手机- ppg的心律进行分类。该算法是在单独的心律转复队列患者的PPG记录上进行训练的。通过该算法分析外部验证队列的光容积脉搏波记录。通过比较心律分类输出与同时心电图记录的诊断(金标准)来计算诊断性能。共有460例患者同时进行了34097次PPG和ECG记录,分为180例(16092次)训练组和280例(18005次)外部验证组。外部验证队列中诊断AF的PPG记录的算法分类,敏感性、特异性和准确性为99.7/99.7/99.7%,AF/AFL的敏感性、特异性和准确性为99.3/99.1/99.2%。结论:基于机器学习的算法在无监督的门诊环境下从智能手机ppg记录诊断心房颤动和心房扑动方面表现出色,最大限度地减少了对老年心律转复人群的人工检查和心电图验证的需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
External validation of a machine learning-based classification algorithm for ambulatory heart rhythm diagnostics in pericardioversion atrial fibrillation patients using smartphone photoplethysmography: the SMARTBEATS-ALGO study.

Aims: The aim of this study was to perform an external validation of an automatic machine learning (ML) algorithm for heart rhythm diagnostics using smartphone photoplethysmography (PPG) recorded by patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) pericardioversion in an unsupervised ambulatory setting.

Methods and results: Patients undergoing cardioversion for AF or AFL performed 1-min heart rhythm recordings pericardioversion at least twice daily for 4-6 weeks, using an iPhone 7 smartphone running a PPG application (CORAI Heart Monitor) simultaneously with a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) recording (KardiaMobile). The algorithm uses support vector machines to classify heart rhythm from smartphone-PPG. The algorithm was trained on PPG recordings made by patients in a separate cardioversion cohort. Photoplethysmography recordings in the external validation cohort were analysed by the algorithm. Diagnostic performance was calculated by comparing the heart rhythm classification output to the diagnosis from the simultaneous ECG recordings (gold standard). In total, 460 patients performed 34 097 simultaneous PPG and ECG recordings, divided into 180 patients with 16 092 recordings in the training cohort and 280 patients with 18 005 recordings in the external validation cohort. Algorithmic classification of the PPG recordings in the external validation cohort diagnosed AF with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.7%, 99.7% and 99.7%, respectively, and AF/AFL with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 99.3%, 99.1% and 99.2%, respectively.

Conclusion: A machine learning-based algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in diagnosing atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter from smartphone-PPG recordings in an unsupervised ambulatory setting, minimizing the need for manual review and ECG verification, in elderly cardioversion populations.

Clinical trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04300270.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信