Hayder Alhusseinawi, Naomi Nadler, Helene Reif Andersen, Juan Luis Vásquez, Thomas Norus, Nessn Azawi
{"title":"保留肾脏手术的精确性:机器人辅助输尿管切除术与新型黑眼™墨水","authors":"Hayder Alhusseinawi, Naomi Nadler, Helene Reif Andersen, Juan Luis Vásquez, Thomas Norus, Nessn Azawi","doi":"10.1002/bco2.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the feasibility, oncological efficacy and safety of robotic segmental ureterectomy (SU) for treating patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A key aspect of this research involves utilising Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink to delineate the boundary of the tumour in the ureter, helping to ensure precise surgical intervention and reducing the risk of positive surgical margin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a prospective non-randomised trial from January 2018 to December 2022, patients with localised UTUC confirmed by CT-urography were enrolled. A Multidisciplinary Team assessed patients for suitability for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with SU, marked by endoscopic Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink. Black Eye Endoscopic Marker Ink marking aimed to enhance surgical precision by delineating clear resection margins. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, local and bladder recurrence rates and surgical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for a balanced comparison to the standard treatment Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty patients underwent SU, in the period of study with only one local recurrence reported with a median follow-up time of 35 months. SU was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (41 minutes less on average, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than RNU. Tumour size was significantly larger in the RNU group (median size 42.5 mm, IQR: 30–60.5) compared to the SU group (median size 30 mm, IQR: 20–35) (<i>p</i> = 0.007), potentially indicating selection bias towards RNU for more advanced cases. No significant difference between the groups was found in the post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication score nor in oncological outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SU with Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink marking is a viable KSS technique that offers a safe and effective alternative to RNU for patients with a single tumour, no longer than 30 mm and of low grade. This novel approach is promising in lowering the risk of positive margins, ensuring cancer control and preserving renal function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precision in kidney-sparing surgery: Robot-assisted ureterectomy with novel Black Eye™ Ink\",\"authors\":\"Hayder Alhusseinawi, Naomi Nadler, Helene Reif Andersen, Juan Luis Vásquez, Thomas Norus, Nessn Azawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the feasibility, oncological efficacy and safety of robotic segmental ureterectomy (SU) for treating patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A key aspect of this research involves utilising Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink to delineate the boundary of the tumour in the ureter, helping to ensure precise surgical intervention and reducing the risk of positive surgical margin.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a prospective non-randomised trial from January 2018 to December 2022, patients with localised UTUC confirmed by CT-urography were enrolled. A Multidisciplinary Team assessed patients for suitability for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with SU, marked by endoscopic Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink. Black Eye Endoscopic Marker Ink marking aimed to enhance surgical precision by delineating clear resection margins. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, local and bladder recurrence rates and surgical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for a balanced comparison to the standard treatment Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty patients underwent SU, in the period of study with only one local recurrence reported with a median follow-up time of 35 months. SU was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (41 minutes less on average, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than RNU. Tumour size was significantly larger in the RNU group (median size 42.5 mm, IQR: 30–60.5) compared to the SU group (median size 30 mm, IQR: 20–35) (<i>p</i> = 0.007), potentially indicating selection bias towards RNU for more advanced cases. No significant difference between the groups was found in the post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication score nor in oncological outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>SU with Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink marking is a viable KSS technique that offers a safe and effective alternative to RNU for patients with a single tumour, no longer than 30 mm and of low grade. This novel approach is promising in lowering the risk of positive margins, ensuring cancer control and preserving renal function.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.502\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Precision in kidney-sparing surgery: Robot-assisted ureterectomy with novel Black Eye™ Ink
Objective
To investigate the feasibility, oncological efficacy and safety of robotic segmental ureterectomy (SU) for treating patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A key aspect of this research involves utilising Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink to delineate the boundary of the tumour in the ureter, helping to ensure precise surgical intervention and reducing the risk of positive surgical margin.
Patients and Methods
In a prospective non-randomised trial from January 2018 to December 2022, patients with localised UTUC confirmed by CT-urography were enrolled. A Multidisciplinary Team assessed patients for suitability for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with SU, marked by endoscopic Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink. Black Eye Endoscopic Marker Ink marking aimed to enhance surgical precision by delineating clear resection margins. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, local and bladder recurrence rates and surgical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for a balanced comparison to the standard treatment Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).
Results
Thirty patients underwent SU, in the period of study with only one local recurrence reported with a median follow-up time of 35 months. SU was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (41 minutes less on average, p < 0.001) than RNU. Tumour size was significantly larger in the RNU group (median size 42.5 mm, IQR: 30–60.5) compared to the SU group (median size 30 mm, IQR: 20–35) (p = 0.007), potentially indicating selection bias towards RNU for more advanced cases. No significant difference between the groups was found in the post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication score nor in oncological outcomes.
Conclusion
SU with Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink marking is a viable KSS technique that offers a safe and effective alternative to RNU for patients with a single tumour, no longer than 30 mm and of low grade. This novel approach is promising in lowering the risk of positive margins, ensuring cancer control and preserving renal function.