保留肾脏手术的精确性:机器人辅助输尿管切除术与新型黑眼™墨水

IF 1.6 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJUI compass Pub Date : 2025-02-19 DOI:10.1002/bco2.502
Hayder Alhusseinawi, Naomi Nadler, Helene Reif Andersen, Juan Luis Vásquez, Thomas Norus, Nessn Azawi
{"title":"保留肾脏手术的精确性:机器人辅助输尿管切除术与新型黑眼™墨水","authors":"Hayder Alhusseinawi,&nbsp;Naomi Nadler,&nbsp;Helene Reif Andersen,&nbsp;Juan Luis Vásquez,&nbsp;Thomas Norus,&nbsp;Nessn Azawi","doi":"10.1002/bco2.502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the feasibility, oncological efficacy and safety of robotic segmental ureterectomy (SU) for treating patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A key aspect of this research involves utilising Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink to delineate the boundary of the tumour in the ureter, helping to ensure precise surgical intervention and reducing the risk of positive surgical margin.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>In a prospective non-randomised trial from January 2018 to December 2022, patients with localised UTUC confirmed by CT-urography were enrolled. A Multidisciplinary Team assessed patients for suitability for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with SU, marked by endoscopic Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink. Black Eye Endoscopic Marker Ink marking aimed to enhance surgical precision by delineating clear resection margins. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, local and bladder recurrence rates and surgical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for a balanced comparison to the standard treatment Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Thirty patients underwent SU, in the period of study with only one local recurrence reported with a median follow-up time of 35 months. SU was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (41 minutes less on average, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than RNU. Tumour size was significantly larger in the RNU group (median size 42.5 mm, IQR: 30–60.5) compared to the SU group (median size 30 mm, IQR: 20–35) (<i>p</i> = 0.007), potentially indicating selection bias towards RNU for more advanced cases. No significant difference between the groups was found in the post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication score nor in oncological outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>SU with Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink marking is a viable KSS technique that offers a safe and effective alternative to RNU for patients with a single tumour, no longer than 30 mm and of low grade. This novel approach is promising in lowering the risk of positive margins, ensuring cancer control and preserving renal function.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72420,"journal":{"name":"BJUI compass","volume":"6 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.502","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Precision in kidney-sparing surgery: Robot-assisted ureterectomy with novel Black Eye™ Ink\",\"authors\":\"Hayder Alhusseinawi,&nbsp;Naomi Nadler,&nbsp;Helene Reif Andersen,&nbsp;Juan Luis Vásquez,&nbsp;Thomas Norus,&nbsp;Nessn Azawi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bco2.502\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To investigate the feasibility, oncological efficacy and safety of robotic segmental ureterectomy (SU) for treating patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A key aspect of this research involves utilising Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink to delineate the boundary of the tumour in the ureter, helping to ensure precise surgical intervention and reducing the risk of positive surgical margin.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Patients and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>In a prospective non-randomised trial from January 2018 to December 2022, patients with localised UTUC confirmed by CT-urography were enrolled. A Multidisciplinary Team assessed patients for suitability for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with SU, marked by endoscopic Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink. Black Eye Endoscopic Marker Ink marking aimed to enhance surgical precision by delineating clear resection margins. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, local and bladder recurrence rates and surgical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for a balanced comparison to the standard treatment Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirty patients underwent SU, in the period of study with only one local recurrence reported with a median follow-up time of 35 months. SU was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (41 minutes less on average, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) than RNU. Tumour size was significantly larger in the RNU group (median size 42.5 mm, IQR: 30–60.5) compared to the SU group (median size 30 mm, IQR: 20–35) (<i>p</i> = 0.007), potentially indicating selection bias towards RNU for more advanced cases. No significant difference between the groups was found in the post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication score nor in oncological outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>SU with Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink marking is a viable KSS technique that offers a safe and effective alternative to RNU for patients with a single tumour, no longer than 30 mm and of low grade. This novel approach is promising in lowering the risk of positive margins, ensuring cancer control and preserving renal function.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJUI compass\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bco2.502\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJUI compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.502\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJUI compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bco2.502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨机器人输尿管节段切除术(SU)治疗局限性上尿路上皮癌(UTUC)的可行性、肿瘤学疗效和安全性。这项研究的一个关键方面是利用Black Eye™内窥镜标记墨水来划定输尿管肿瘤的边界,有助于确保精确的手术干预并降低手术切缘阳性的风险。患者和方法在2018年1月至2022年12月的一项前瞻性非随机试验中,入组了通过ct尿路造影确诊的局部UTUC患者。一个多学科团队评估了患者是否适合用SU进行保肾手术(KSS),用内窥镜黑眼™内窥镜标记墨水进行标记。黑眼圈内窥镜标记墨水标记旨在通过描绘清晰的切除边缘来提高手术精度。主要终点是技术的可行性,局部和膀胱复发率以及手术结果。倾向评分匹配用于与标准治疗根治性肾输尿管切除术(RNU)进行平衡比较。结果30例患者接受了SU治疗,研究期间仅有1例局部复发,中位随访时间为35个月。与RNU相比,SU的手术时间明显缩短(平均减少41分钟,p < 0.001)。与SU组(中位尺寸为30 mm, IQR为20-35)相比,RNU组的肿瘤大小(中位尺寸为42.5 mm, IQR为30 - 60.5)明显更大(p = 0.007),这可能表明在更晚期的病例中,RNU的选择偏倚。两组术后Clavien-Dindo并发症评分及肿瘤预后无显著差异。结论:SU与Black Eye™内窥镜标记墨水标记是一种可行的KSS技术,为单个肿瘤不超过30mm且分级低的患者提供了安全有效的替代RNU的方法。这种新方法有望降低阳性切缘的风险,确保癌症控制和保留肾功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Precision in kidney-sparing surgery: Robot-assisted ureterectomy with novel Black Eye™ Ink

Precision in kidney-sparing surgery: Robot-assisted ureterectomy with novel Black Eye™ Ink

Objective

To investigate the feasibility, oncological efficacy and safety of robotic segmental ureterectomy (SU) for treating patients with localised upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). A key aspect of this research involves utilising Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink to delineate the boundary of the tumour in the ureter, helping to ensure precise surgical intervention and reducing the risk of positive surgical margin.

Patients and Methods

In a prospective non-randomised trial from January 2018 to December 2022, patients with localised UTUC confirmed by CT-urography were enrolled. A Multidisciplinary Team assessed patients for suitability for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) with SU, marked by endoscopic Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink. Black Eye Endoscopic Marker Ink marking aimed to enhance surgical precision by delineating clear resection margins. The primary endpoints were the feasibility of the technique, local and bladder recurrence rates and surgical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used for a balanced comparison to the standard treatment Radical Nephroureterectomy (RNU).

Results

Thirty patients underwent SU, in the period of study with only one local recurrence reported with a median follow-up time of 35 months. SU was associated with a significantly shorter operative time (41 minutes less on average, p < 0.001) than RNU. Tumour size was significantly larger in the RNU group (median size 42.5 mm, IQR: 30–60.5) compared to the SU group (median size 30 mm, IQR: 20–35) (p = 0.007), potentially indicating selection bias towards RNU for more advanced cases. No significant difference between the groups was found in the post-operative Clavien-Dindo complication score nor in oncological outcomes.

Conclusion

SU with Black Eye™ Endoscopic Marker Ink marking is a viable KSS technique that offers a safe and effective alternative to RNU for patients with a single tumour, no longer than 30 mm and of low grade. This novel approach is promising in lowering the risk of positive margins, ensuring cancer control and preserving renal function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信