读者和文本特征对六年级学生推理能力的影响

IF 2 2区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kate Cain, Nicola K. Currie, Gillian Francey, Robert Davies, Shelley Gray, Mindy S. Bridges, M. Adelaida Restrepo, Marilyn S. Thompson, Margeaux F. Ciraolo
{"title":"读者和文本特征对六年级学生推理能力的影响","authors":"Kate Cain,&nbsp;Nicola K. Currie,&nbsp;Gillian Francey,&nbsp;Robert Davies,&nbsp;Shelley Gray,&nbsp;Mindy S. Bridges,&nbsp;M. Adelaida Restrepo,&nbsp;Marilyn S. Thompson,&nbsp;Margeaux F. Ciraolo","doi":"10.1111/1467-9817.12474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We examined the influence of text and reader characteristics on sixth graders' inference generation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven- to 12-year-old US monolingual English speakers (<i>N</i> = 71) and Spanish-English bilinguals (<i>N</i> = 81) read narrative and informational expository texts requiring an inference and answered an inference-tapping question after each text. We examined the influence of language status, word reading ability, knowledge (background knowledge and vocabulary), and reading strategy awareness and use on question accuracy, question-answering times and sentence reading times.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Linear mixed effects models predicting response accuracy indicated an advantage for narrative texts, in general, and for participants with higher knowledge. When examining variation across the whole sample, rather than contrasting language groups, faster question-answering and sentence processing times were associated with higher knowledge.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Adolescent readers are better able to generate inferences from narrative than informational expository texts, and knowledge has a critical influence on both the process and product of inference generation and may explain reading comprehension performance differences between monolingual and bilingual students.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47611,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Reading","volume":"48 1","pages":"24-45"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9817.12474","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The influence of reader and text characteristics on sixth graders' inference making\",\"authors\":\"Kate Cain,&nbsp;Nicola K. Currie,&nbsp;Gillian Francey,&nbsp;Robert Davies,&nbsp;Shelley Gray,&nbsp;Mindy S. Bridges,&nbsp;M. Adelaida Restrepo,&nbsp;Marilyn S. Thompson,&nbsp;Margeaux F. Ciraolo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9817.12474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>We examined the influence of text and reader characteristics on sixth graders' inference generation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Eleven- to 12-year-old US monolingual English speakers (<i>N</i> = 71) and Spanish-English bilinguals (<i>N</i> = 81) read narrative and informational expository texts requiring an inference and answered an inference-tapping question after each text. We examined the influence of language status, word reading ability, knowledge (background knowledge and vocabulary), and reading strategy awareness and use on question accuracy, question-answering times and sentence reading times.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Linear mixed effects models predicting response accuracy indicated an advantage for narrative texts, in general, and for participants with higher knowledge. When examining variation across the whole sample, rather than contrasting language groups, faster question-answering and sentence processing times were associated with higher knowledge.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Adolescent readers are better able to generate inferences from narrative than informational expository texts, and knowledge has a critical influence on both the process and product of inference generation and may explain reading comprehension performance differences between monolingual and bilingual students.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Reading\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"24-45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9817.12474\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Reading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12474\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9817.12474","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了文本特征和读者特征对六年级学生推理生成的影响。方法11 ~ 12岁的美国单语英语者(71例)和西班牙语-英语双语者(81例)阅读需要推理的叙事性和信息性说说性文本,并在每个文本后回答一个推理题。我们考察了语言状况、词汇阅读能力、知识(背景知识和词汇)、阅读策略意识和使用对问题准确性、问答次数和句子阅读次数的影响。结果线性混合效应模型预测反应准确性表明,一般来说,叙事性文本和知识水平较高的参与者具有优势。当检查整个样本的差异,而不是对比语言群体时,更快的问题回答和句子处理时间与更高的知识相关。结论青少年读者从叙事文本中产生推理的能力优于信息性说明性文本,知识对推理产生的过程和结果都有重要影响,这可能解释了单语和双语学生阅读理解表现的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The influence of reader and text characteristics on sixth graders' inference making

The influence of reader and text characteristics on sixth graders' inference making

Background

We examined the influence of text and reader characteristics on sixth graders' inference generation.

Methods

Eleven- to 12-year-old US monolingual English speakers (N = 71) and Spanish-English bilinguals (N = 81) read narrative and informational expository texts requiring an inference and answered an inference-tapping question after each text. We examined the influence of language status, word reading ability, knowledge (background knowledge and vocabulary), and reading strategy awareness and use on question accuracy, question-answering times and sentence reading times.

Results

Linear mixed effects models predicting response accuracy indicated an advantage for narrative texts, in general, and for participants with higher knowledge. When examining variation across the whole sample, rather than contrasting language groups, faster question-answering and sentence processing times were associated with higher knowledge.

Conclusions

Adolescent readers are better able to generate inferences from narrative than informational expository texts, and knowledge has a critical influence on both the process and product of inference generation and may explain reading comprehension performance differences between monolingual and bilingual students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Reading provides an international forum for researchers into literacy. It is a refereed journal, principally devoted to reports of empirical studies in reading and related fields, and to informed reviews of relevant literature. The journal welcomes papers researching issues related to the learning, teaching and use of literacy in a variety of contexts; papers on the history and development of literacy; papers about policy and strategy for literacy as related to children and adults. Journal of Research in Reading encourages papers within any research paradigm and from researchers in any relevant field such as anthropology, cultural studies, education, history of education, language and linguistics, philosophy, psychology and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信