弥合肿瘤领域的差距:美国和日本抗癌药物和伴随诊断的开发和批准途径的比较分析

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Kaku Saito, Mamoru Narukawa
{"title":"弥合肿瘤领域的差距:美国和日本抗癌药物和伴随诊断的开发和批准途径的比较分析","authors":"Kaku Saito,&nbsp;Mamoru Narukawa","doi":"10.1111/cts.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Companion diagnostics (CDxs) are essential in personalized medicine for oncology, where specific genetic mutations drive treatment decisions. Some differences remain in the regulatory frameworks and approval processes for CDx between the United States (U.S.) and Japan. Data were collected from public databases for CDxs and anticancer drugs approved between January 1, 2014, and August 15, 2024, in both countries. The analysis included both initial drug approvals and supplemental approvals to examine the characteristics of approved CDxs and anticancer drugs, identify regional differences, compare development and approval timelines of CDxs and associated anticancer drugs in both countries, and assess the factors influencing approval timelines. CDx approval has increased significantly in both countries since 2014, driven by next-generation sequencing technologies, with 96 anticancer drug indications approved with CDx in the U.S. and 61 in Japan. In the U.S., drug approvals often preceded CDx approvals, influenced by post-marketing commitments (PMCs), whereas Japan tended to approve CDxs and drugs almost simultaneously. The median gap between CDx and drug approvals in the U.S. was 0 days (interquartile range (IQR): 0–391), indicating a broader range and often longer delay compared to 18 days (IQR: −52 to 0) in Japan, with a statistically significant difference between the two countries (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed orphan drug designation was significantly associated with CDx-related PMC in the U.S. (<i>p</i> = 0.042). These results highlight the need for greater regulatory harmonization between the U.S. and Japan to streamline approval processes and improve patient access to personalized treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":50610,"journal":{"name":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","volume":"18 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Gaps in Oncology: Comparative Analysis of Development and Approval Pathways for Anticancer Drugs and Companion Diagnostic in the United States and Japan\",\"authors\":\"Kaku Saito,&nbsp;Mamoru Narukawa\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cts.70162\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Companion diagnostics (CDxs) are essential in personalized medicine for oncology, where specific genetic mutations drive treatment decisions. Some differences remain in the regulatory frameworks and approval processes for CDx between the United States (U.S.) and Japan. Data were collected from public databases for CDxs and anticancer drugs approved between January 1, 2014, and August 15, 2024, in both countries. The analysis included both initial drug approvals and supplemental approvals to examine the characteristics of approved CDxs and anticancer drugs, identify regional differences, compare development and approval timelines of CDxs and associated anticancer drugs in both countries, and assess the factors influencing approval timelines. CDx approval has increased significantly in both countries since 2014, driven by next-generation sequencing technologies, with 96 anticancer drug indications approved with CDx in the U.S. and 61 in Japan. In the U.S., drug approvals often preceded CDx approvals, influenced by post-marketing commitments (PMCs), whereas Japan tended to approve CDxs and drugs almost simultaneously. The median gap between CDx and drug approvals in the U.S. was 0 days (interquartile range (IQR): 0–391), indicating a broader range and often longer delay compared to 18 days (IQR: −52 to 0) in Japan, with a statistically significant difference between the two countries (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed orphan drug designation was significantly associated with CDx-related PMC in the U.S. (<i>p</i> = 0.042). These results highlight the need for greater regulatory harmonization between the U.S. and Japan to streamline approval processes and improve patient access to personalized treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"volume\":\"18 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cts.70162\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70162\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cts-Clinical and Translational Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cts.70162","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

伴随诊断(CDxs)在肿瘤学个性化医疗中是必不可少的,其中特定的基因突变驱动治疗决策。美国和日本在CDx的监管框架和审批程序方面仍存在一些差异。数据收集自2014年1月1日至2024年8月15日在两国批准的cdx和抗癌药物的公共数据库。该分析包括初始药物批准和补充批准,以检查已批准的cdx和抗癌药物的特征,确定区域差异,比较两国cdx和相关抗癌药物的开发和批准时间表,并评估影响批准时间表的因素。自2014年以来,在下一代测序技术的推动下,CDx在两国的批准量显著增加,在美国和日本分别有96种和61种抗癌药适应症获得了CDx批准。在美国,受上市后承诺(PMCs)的影响,药物批准通常先于CDx批准,而日本倾向于几乎同时批准CDx和药物。美国CDx和药物批准之间的中位数差距为0天(四分位数间距(IQR): 0 - 391),与日本的18天(IQR: - 52至0)相比,美国CDx和药物批准之间的中位数差距更大,往往更长的延迟,两国之间存在统计学差异(p < 0.0001)。Logistic回归分析显示,孤儿药认定与cdx相关的PMC在美国显著相关(p = 0.042)。这些结果突出表明,美国和日本之间需要加强监管协调,以简化审批程序,改善患者获得个性化治疗的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bridging Gaps in Oncology: Comparative Analysis of Development and Approval Pathways for Anticancer Drugs and Companion Diagnostic in the United States and Japan

Bridging Gaps in Oncology: Comparative Analysis of Development and Approval Pathways for Anticancer Drugs and Companion Diagnostic in the United States and Japan

Companion diagnostics (CDxs) are essential in personalized medicine for oncology, where specific genetic mutations drive treatment decisions. Some differences remain in the regulatory frameworks and approval processes for CDx between the United States (U.S.) and Japan. Data were collected from public databases for CDxs and anticancer drugs approved between January 1, 2014, and August 15, 2024, in both countries. The analysis included both initial drug approvals and supplemental approvals to examine the characteristics of approved CDxs and anticancer drugs, identify regional differences, compare development and approval timelines of CDxs and associated anticancer drugs in both countries, and assess the factors influencing approval timelines. CDx approval has increased significantly in both countries since 2014, driven by next-generation sequencing technologies, with 96 anticancer drug indications approved with CDx in the U.S. and 61 in Japan. In the U.S., drug approvals often preceded CDx approvals, influenced by post-marketing commitments (PMCs), whereas Japan tended to approve CDxs and drugs almost simultaneously. The median gap between CDx and drug approvals in the U.S. was 0 days (interquartile range (IQR): 0–391), indicating a broader range and often longer delay compared to 18 days (IQR: −52 to 0) in Japan, with a statistically significant difference between the two countries (p < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis revealed orphan drug designation was significantly associated with CDx-related PMC in the U.S. (p = 0.042). These results highlight the need for greater regulatory harmonization between the U.S. and Japan to streamline approval processes and improve patient access to personalized treatments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science
Cts-Clinical and Translational Science 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
234
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Science (CTS), an official journal of the American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, highlights original translational medicine research that helps bridge laboratory discoveries with the diagnosis and treatment of human disease. Translational medicine is a multi-faceted discipline with a focus on translational therapeutics. In a broad sense, translational medicine bridges across the discovery, development, regulation, and utilization spectrum. Research may appear as Full Articles, Brief Reports, Commentaries, Phase Forwards (clinical trials), Reviews, or Tutorials. CTS also includes invited didactic content that covers the connections between clinical pharmacology and translational medicine. Best-in-class methodologies and best practices are also welcomed as Tutorials. These additional features provide context for research articles and facilitate understanding for a wide array of individuals interested in clinical and translational science. CTS welcomes high quality, scientifically sound, original manuscripts focused on clinical pharmacology and translational science, including animal, in vitro, in silico, and clinical studies supporting the breadth of drug discovery, development, regulation and clinical use of both traditional drugs and innovative modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信