一个集成的人工智能和优化模型,以提高信用证审查过程的操作效率和降低风险

Mounaf Asaad Khalil, Majed Hadid, Regina Padmanabhan, Adel Elomri, Laoucine Kerbache
{"title":"一个集成的人工智能和优化模型,以提高信用证审查过程的操作效率和降低风险","authors":"Mounaf Asaad Khalil,&nbsp;Majed Hadid,&nbsp;Regina Padmanabhan,&nbsp;Adel Elomri,&nbsp;Laoucine Kerbache","doi":"10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Digital transformation in banking has significantly improved efficiency, including in the critical Letter of Credit (LC) examination area. Despite these advancements, LC examination remains complex, labor-intensive, and error-prone, leading to operational risks and inefficiencies. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a promising solution but requires human checkers to verify AI-generated decisions, ensuring accuracy and compliance. Assigning these verification tasks is essential to fully capitalize on AI’s potential, balancing time savings with risk reduction. This paper explores the underexamined challenge of optimizing the hybrid process of AI-assisted LC examination to enhance trade finance. The research aims to minimize examination risk and maximize checker capacity utilization by offering practical strategies for improvement. Through data-driven research collaboration with international banks and FinTech companies and benchmarking relevant literature, an Integer Linear Programming model was developed to assign review tasks for LC documents indexed by AI based on their criticality and discrepancies to human checkers. The model also considers monetary value, checker expertise, and availability factors. Real case studies evaluated improvements over baseline practices, objectives prioritization, trade-off analysis, and varying supply–demand scenarios. The model achieved a 68.3% reduction in operational risks, improving compliance and trustworthiness while minimizing errors and financial losses. Utilization rates ranged from 34% for risk-focused strategies to 73% for efficiency-driven approaches, providing flexibility for resource allocation aligned with organizational priorities. Using the proposed AI-optimization framework and results, the study offers actionable insights for managers and guidance for researchers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100357,"journal":{"name":"Decision Analytics Journal","volume":"14 ","pages":"Article 100552"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An integrated Artificial Intelligence and optimization model for operational efficiency and risk reduction in Letter of Credit examination process\",\"authors\":\"Mounaf Asaad Khalil,&nbsp;Majed Hadid,&nbsp;Regina Padmanabhan,&nbsp;Adel Elomri,&nbsp;Laoucine Kerbache\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dajour.2025.100552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Digital transformation in banking has significantly improved efficiency, including in the critical Letter of Credit (LC) examination area. Despite these advancements, LC examination remains complex, labor-intensive, and error-prone, leading to operational risks and inefficiencies. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a promising solution but requires human checkers to verify AI-generated decisions, ensuring accuracy and compliance. Assigning these verification tasks is essential to fully capitalize on AI’s potential, balancing time savings with risk reduction. This paper explores the underexamined challenge of optimizing the hybrid process of AI-assisted LC examination to enhance trade finance. The research aims to minimize examination risk and maximize checker capacity utilization by offering practical strategies for improvement. Through data-driven research collaboration with international banks and FinTech companies and benchmarking relevant literature, an Integer Linear Programming model was developed to assign review tasks for LC documents indexed by AI based on their criticality and discrepancies to human checkers. The model also considers monetary value, checker expertise, and availability factors. Real case studies evaluated improvements over baseline practices, objectives prioritization, trade-off analysis, and varying supply–demand scenarios. The model achieved a 68.3% reduction in operational risks, improving compliance and trustworthiness while minimizing errors and financial losses. Utilization rates ranged from 34% for risk-focused strategies to 73% for efficiency-driven approaches, providing flexibility for resource allocation aligned with organizational priorities. Using the proposed AI-optimization framework and results, the study offers actionable insights for managers and guidance for researchers.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Decision Analytics Journal\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100552\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Decision Analytics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662225000086\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decision Analytics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772662225000086","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

银行业的数字化转型显著提高了效率,包括关键的信用证(LC)审查领域。尽管有了这些进步,LC检查仍然很复杂,劳动密集,容易出错,导致操作风险和效率低下。集成人工智能(AI)提供了一个很有前途的解决方案,但需要人工检查人员来验证人工智能生成的决策,以确保准确性和合规性。分配这些验证任务对于充分利用人工智能的潜力,平衡节省时间和降低风险至关重要。本文探讨了优化人工智能辅助信用证审查的混合流程以增强贸易融资的挑战。该研究旨在通过提供切实可行的改进策略,最大限度地降低检查风险,最大限度地提高检查人员的能力利用率。通过与国际银行和金融科技公司的数据驱动研究合作,并对相关文献进行基准测试,开发了一个整数线性规划模型,根据AI索引的LC文件的重要性和差异,将审查任务分配给人工检查人员。该模型还考虑了货币价值、检查人员专业知识和可用性因素。真实的案例研究评估了基线实践、目标优先级、权衡分析和不同的供需场景的改进。该模型将操作风险降低了68.3%,提高了合规性和可信度,同时最大限度地减少了错误和财务损失。利用率从以风险为中心的策略的34%到以效率为导向的方法的73%不等,为资源分配提供了与组织优先级一致的灵活性。利用提出的人工智能优化框架和结果,该研究为管理人员提供了可操作的见解,并为研究人员提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An integrated Artificial Intelligence and optimization model for operational efficiency and risk reduction in Letter of Credit examination process
Digital transformation in banking has significantly improved efficiency, including in the critical Letter of Credit (LC) examination area. Despite these advancements, LC examination remains complex, labor-intensive, and error-prone, leading to operational risks and inefficiencies. Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) offers a promising solution but requires human checkers to verify AI-generated decisions, ensuring accuracy and compliance. Assigning these verification tasks is essential to fully capitalize on AI’s potential, balancing time savings with risk reduction. This paper explores the underexamined challenge of optimizing the hybrid process of AI-assisted LC examination to enhance trade finance. The research aims to minimize examination risk and maximize checker capacity utilization by offering practical strategies for improvement. Through data-driven research collaboration with international banks and FinTech companies and benchmarking relevant literature, an Integer Linear Programming model was developed to assign review tasks for LC documents indexed by AI based on their criticality and discrepancies to human checkers. The model also considers monetary value, checker expertise, and availability factors. Real case studies evaluated improvements over baseline practices, objectives prioritization, trade-off analysis, and varying supply–demand scenarios. The model achieved a 68.3% reduction in operational risks, improving compliance and trustworthiness while minimizing errors and financial losses. Utilization rates ranged from 34% for risk-focused strategies to 73% for efficiency-driven approaches, providing flexibility for resource allocation aligned with organizational priorities. Using the proposed AI-optimization framework and results, the study offers actionable insights for managers and guidance for researchers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信