Bader A. Alfares , Martijn V. Verhagen , Rudi A.J.O. Dierckx , Hubert P. van der Doef , Robbert J. de Haas , Reinoud P.H. Bokkers
{"title":"Diagnosing portal vein stenosis after pediatric liver transplantation: A systematic review","authors":"Bader A. Alfares , Martijn V. Verhagen , Rudi A.J.O. Dierckx , Hubert P. van der Doef , Robbert J. de Haas , Reinoud P.H. Bokkers","doi":"10.1016/j.trre.2025.100912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Portal vein stenosis (PVS) is a relatively frequent vascular complication after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) that may result in portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of various diagnostic methods and imaging criteria used to diagnose PVS and to report their diagnostic accuracy. Until August 2024, PubMed and Embase were searched for English-language manuscripts with >5 patients and radiologic features of PVS. Three investigators screened articles and extracted data. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Twenty studies were identified. Doppler ultrasound (DUS) was the most used imaging method, followed by computed tomography (CT) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In studies comparing DUS with other diagnostic modalities, an elevated peak systolic velocity (PSV) and velocity ratio (VR) emerged as reliable indicators of PVS. An anastomotic diameter of <3.5 mm showed the best diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 91.8 %. Although DUS is the preferred initial diagnostic tool due to its non-invasive nature, CT and DSA remain essential in cases where DUS findings are inconclusive or when more detailed vascular assessment is necessary. DSA also allows for simultaneous endovascular treatment, further enhancing its utility. This systematic review emphasizes the need for larger, prospective studies to directly compare the diagnostic performance of these imaging modalities and to establish more consistent and reliable criteria for diagnosing PVS after pLT.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48973,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation Reviews","volume":"39 2","pages":"Article 100912"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955470X25000126","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
门静脉狭窄(PVS)是小儿肝移植(pLT)后比较常见的血管并发症,可能导致门静脉高压。本研究旨在概述用于诊断 PVS 的各种诊断方法和成像标准,并报告其诊断准确性。在2024年8月之前,我们在PubMed和Embase上检索了有>5名患者和PVS放射学特征的英文稿件。三名研究人员筛选了文章并提取了数据。采用QUADAS-2评估偏倚风险。共确定了 20 项研究。多普勒超声(DUS)是最常用的成像方法,其次是计算机断层扫描(CT)和数字减影血管造影(DSA)。在比较 DUS 与其他诊断方法的研究中,峰值收缩速度(PSV)和速度比值(VR)升高成为 PVS 的可靠指标。吻合口直径为 3.5 毫米的诊断效果最佳,敏感性为 100%,特异性为 91.8%。尽管 DUS 因其非侵入性而成为首选的初步诊断工具,但在 DUS 结果不确定或需要进行更详细的血管评估时,CT 和 DSA 仍然是必不可少的。DSA 还可同时进行血管内治疗,进一步提高了其实用性。本系统综述强调有必要进行更大规模的前瞻性研究,以直接比较这些成像模式的诊断性能,并为 pLT 后 PVS 的诊断建立更一致、更可靠的标准。
Diagnosing portal vein stenosis after pediatric liver transplantation: A systematic review
Portal vein stenosis (PVS) is a relatively frequent vascular complication after pediatric liver transplantation (pLT) that may result in portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of various diagnostic methods and imaging criteria used to diagnose PVS and to report their diagnostic accuracy. Until August 2024, PubMed and Embase were searched for English-language manuscripts with >5 patients and radiologic features of PVS. Three investigators screened articles and extracted data. The risk of bias was assessed using QUADAS-2. Twenty studies were identified. Doppler ultrasound (DUS) was the most used imaging method, followed by computed tomography (CT) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In studies comparing DUS with other diagnostic modalities, an elevated peak systolic velocity (PSV) and velocity ratio (VR) emerged as reliable indicators of PVS. An anastomotic diameter of <3.5 mm showed the best diagnostic performance, with a sensitivity of 100 % and a specificity of 91.8 %. Although DUS is the preferred initial diagnostic tool due to its non-invasive nature, CT and DSA remain essential in cases where DUS findings are inconclusive or when more detailed vascular assessment is necessary. DSA also allows for simultaneous endovascular treatment, further enhancing its utility. This systematic review emphasizes the need for larger, prospective studies to directly compare the diagnostic performance of these imaging modalities and to establish more consistent and reliable criteria for diagnosing PVS after pLT.
期刊介绍:
Transplantation Reviews contains state-of-the-art review articles on both clinical and experimental transplantation. The journal features invited articles by authorities in immunology, transplantation medicine and surgery.