医疗补助扩张与注射吸毒者滥用处方阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物无关:一项使用广义差异中差异模型的连续横断面观察研究

0 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Danielle F. Haley , Stephanie Beane , Courtney R. Yarbrough , Janet Cummings , Sabriya Linton , Umed Ibragimov , Regine Haardörfer , Catlainn Sionean , Rashunda Lewis , Hannah L.F. Cooper , For the NHBS Study Group
{"title":"医疗补助扩张与注射吸毒者滥用处方阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物无关:一项使用广义差异中差异模型的连续横断面观察研究","authors":"Danielle F. Haley ,&nbsp;Stephanie Beane ,&nbsp;Courtney R. Yarbrough ,&nbsp;Janet Cummings ,&nbsp;Sabriya Linton ,&nbsp;Umed Ibragimov ,&nbsp;Regine Haardörfer ,&nbsp;Catlainn Sionean ,&nbsp;Rashunda Lewis ,&nbsp;Hannah L.F. Cooper ,&nbsp;For the NHBS Study Group","doi":"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While evidence suggests Medicaid expansion can reduce overdose, some expressed concern expansion fueled the US opioid overdose crisis by increasing access to low-cost prescription opioids diverted for non-prescribed use. Ecologic studies find a protective relationship or no relationship between expansion and area-level opioid prescribing. Little is known about the relationship between expansion and opioid use among people experiencing poverty who inject drugs (PWID), a population at heightened risk of overdose likely to benefit from Medicaid expansion. We examined whether expansion was associated with prescription opioid and benzodiazepine misuse among PWID experiencing poverty and whether associations varied by race/ethnicity and HIV status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This serial cross-sectional observational study used generalized difference-in-differences models to analyze data (2012, 2015, 2018) from 19,728 PWID aged 18–64 with income ≤138 % of federal poverty line from 13 states in the CDC's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance. Outcomes included past 12-month non-injection and injection prescription opioid misuse and benzodiazepine misuse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample (<em>N</em> = 19,728) was 40 % non-Latinx Black persons and 22 % Latinx persons. Past 12-month non-injection prescription opioid misuse was 33 %, injection prescription opioid misuse was 16 %, and benzodiazepine use was 40 %. Across all models, there was no association between expansion and prescription opioid misuse (confidence intervals included 0) or prescription benzodiazepine misuse (confidence intervals included 0). Associations did not vary by race/ethnicity or HIV status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found no association between Medicaid expansion and opioid or benzodiazepine misuse overall, by race/ethnicity, or HIV status among a large, geographically diverse sample of PWID. These findings provide empirical evidence that expansion is not associated with prescription opioid or benzodiazepine misuse in a population likely to benefit from expansion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","volume":"171 ","pages":"Article 209639"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Medicaid expansion is not associated with prescription opioid and benzodiazepine misuse among people who inject drugs: A serial cross-sectional observational study using generalized difference-in-differences models\",\"authors\":\"Danielle F. Haley ,&nbsp;Stephanie Beane ,&nbsp;Courtney R. Yarbrough ,&nbsp;Janet Cummings ,&nbsp;Sabriya Linton ,&nbsp;Umed Ibragimov ,&nbsp;Regine Haardörfer ,&nbsp;Catlainn Sionean ,&nbsp;Rashunda Lewis ,&nbsp;Hannah L.F. Cooper ,&nbsp;For the NHBS Study Group\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.josat.2025.209639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>While evidence suggests Medicaid expansion can reduce overdose, some expressed concern expansion fueled the US opioid overdose crisis by increasing access to low-cost prescription opioids diverted for non-prescribed use. Ecologic studies find a protective relationship or no relationship between expansion and area-level opioid prescribing. Little is known about the relationship between expansion and opioid use among people experiencing poverty who inject drugs (PWID), a population at heightened risk of overdose likely to benefit from Medicaid expansion. We examined whether expansion was associated with prescription opioid and benzodiazepine misuse among PWID experiencing poverty and whether associations varied by race/ethnicity and HIV status.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This serial cross-sectional observational study used generalized difference-in-differences models to analyze data (2012, 2015, 2018) from 19,728 PWID aged 18–64 with income ≤138 % of federal poverty line from 13 states in the CDC's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance. Outcomes included past 12-month non-injection and injection prescription opioid misuse and benzodiazepine misuse.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The sample (<em>N</em> = 19,728) was 40 % non-Latinx Black persons and 22 % Latinx persons. Past 12-month non-injection prescription opioid misuse was 33 %, injection prescription opioid misuse was 16 %, and benzodiazepine use was 40 %. Across all models, there was no association between expansion and prescription opioid misuse (confidence intervals included 0) or prescription benzodiazepine misuse (confidence intervals included 0). Associations did not vary by race/ethnicity or HIV status.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found no association between Medicaid expansion and opioid or benzodiazepine misuse overall, by race/ethnicity, or HIV status among a large, geographically diverse sample of PWID. These findings provide empirical evidence that expansion is not associated with prescription opioid or benzodiazepine misuse in a population likely to benefit from expansion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73960,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"volume\":\"171 \",\"pages\":\"Article 209639\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of substance use and addiction treatment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949875925000189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然有证据表明,医疗补助计划的扩张可以减少药物过量,但一些人表示担心,扩张增加了用于非处方用途的低成本处方阿片类药物的获取,从而加剧了美国阿片类药物过量危机。生态学研究发现,扩张与区域级阿片类药物处方之间存在保护关系或没有关系。对于注射毒品的贫困人群(PWID)的扩张与阿片类药物使用之间的关系知之甚少,这是一个可能从医疗补助扩张中受益的过量风险较高的人群。我们研究了在经历贫困的PWID中,扩张是否与处方阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物滥用有关,以及这种关联是否因种族/民族和艾滋病毒状况而异。方法本系列横断面观察研究采用广义差中差模型分析了来自美国疾病控制与预防中心国家艾滋病行为监测中13个州的19,728名年龄在18-64岁、收入≤联邦贫困线138%的PWID患者(2012年、2015年、2018年)的数据。结果包括过去12个月非注射和注射处方阿片类药物滥用和苯二氮卓类药物滥用。结果样本(N = 19,728)中,非拉丁裔黑人占40%,拉丁裔占22%。过去12个月非注射处方阿片类药物滥用占33%,注射处方阿片类药物滥用占16%,苯二氮卓类药物滥用占40%。在所有模型中,扩张与处方阿片类药物滥用(置信区间为0)或处方苯二氮卓类药物滥用(置信区间为0)之间没有关联。这种关联没有因种族/民族或艾滋病毒状况而变化。结论:在一个大的、地理上不同的PWID样本中,我们发现医疗补助计划的扩大与阿片类药物或苯二氮卓类药物滥用之间没有关联,不分种族/民族或艾滋病毒状况。这些发现提供了经验证据,表明在可能受益于扩张的人群中,扩张与处方阿片类药物或苯二氮卓类药物滥用无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Medicaid expansion is not associated with prescription opioid and benzodiazepine misuse among people who inject drugs: A serial cross-sectional observational study using generalized difference-in-differences models

Background

While evidence suggests Medicaid expansion can reduce overdose, some expressed concern expansion fueled the US opioid overdose crisis by increasing access to low-cost prescription opioids diverted for non-prescribed use. Ecologic studies find a protective relationship or no relationship between expansion and area-level opioid prescribing. Little is known about the relationship between expansion and opioid use among people experiencing poverty who inject drugs (PWID), a population at heightened risk of overdose likely to benefit from Medicaid expansion. We examined whether expansion was associated with prescription opioid and benzodiazepine misuse among PWID experiencing poverty and whether associations varied by race/ethnicity and HIV status.

Methods

This serial cross-sectional observational study used generalized difference-in-differences models to analyze data (2012, 2015, 2018) from 19,728 PWID aged 18–64 with income ≤138 % of federal poverty line from 13 states in the CDC's National HIV Behavioral Surveillance. Outcomes included past 12-month non-injection and injection prescription opioid misuse and benzodiazepine misuse.

Results

The sample (N = 19,728) was 40 % non-Latinx Black persons and 22 % Latinx persons. Past 12-month non-injection prescription opioid misuse was 33 %, injection prescription opioid misuse was 16 %, and benzodiazepine use was 40 %. Across all models, there was no association between expansion and prescription opioid misuse (confidence intervals included 0) or prescription benzodiazepine misuse (confidence intervals included 0). Associations did not vary by race/ethnicity or HIV status.

Conclusions

We found no association between Medicaid expansion and opioid or benzodiazepine misuse overall, by race/ethnicity, or HIV status among a large, geographically diverse sample of PWID. These findings provide empirical evidence that expansion is not associated with prescription opioid or benzodiazepine misuse in a population likely to benefit from expansion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment
Journal of substance use and addiction treatment Biological Psychiatry, Neuroscience (General), Psychiatry and Mental Health, Psychology (General)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信