在幕上脑肿瘤手术中,采用阶梯状颅周边缘的头皮切口以减少伤口愈合不良的后遗症:一个早期结果的技术说明。

Neurosurgery practice Pub Date : 2023-09-22 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01 DOI:10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000052
Nicholas Popp, Ishan Singhal, Brandon Laing, Kate B Krucoff, Max O Krucoff
{"title":"在幕上脑肿瘤手术中,采用阶梯状颅周边缘的头皮切口以减少伤口愈合不良的后遗症:一个早期结果的技术说明。","authors":"Nicholas Popp, Ishan Singhal, Brandon Laing, Kate B Krucoff, Max O Krucoff","doi":"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Wound healing problems are especially prevalent in craniotomies for intra-axial brain tumors as patients often require radiation, chemotherapy, and chronic steroids. Although newer techniques such as minimally invasive approaches and routine vancomycin powder use have helped overall complication rates, poor skin healing remains a frustratingly persistent cause of morbidity. Therefore, here we describe the novel technique of elevating and closing a stairstep pericranial edge offset from the skin incision to protect hardware and support wound healing, and we report early outcomes using this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-one consecutive patients underwent supratentorial, intra-axial brain tumor surgery with a single surgeon at a single institution using this technique. Patient demographics, pathology, adjuvant interventions, and other independent risk factors were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No wound-related complications requiring readmission, intravenous antibiotics, or reoperation were encountered at a median 3-month follow-up. There were also no surgical site infections, dehiscences, or cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Fifty-one patients (57.3%) had postoperative radiotherapy, 85 patients (93.4%) had perioperative steroids, and 56 patients (61.5%) had postoperative chemotherapy. Six patients (6.5%) were placed on a short course of oral antibiotics perioperatively due to concerns with initial scalp healing (ie, excessive scabbing at follow-up), none of whom progressed to infection or required further intervention. These are the cases where this technique is felt to have been most helpful by potentially preventing worse sequelae. One patient developed a shunt infection during this interval that required removal unrelated to the craniotomy site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Here we outline in detail the principles, design, and execution of incisions and closures with stairstep pericranial edges in supratentorial brain surgery. This technique was designed in consultation with plastic surgeons to provide an intact, vascularized layer of pericranium beneath the healing skin and over the bone graft/hardware to optimize wound healing conditions and prevent morbid sequelae in inevitable cases of poor initial healing. Early results are promising.</p>","PeriodicalId":74298,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery practice","volume":"4 4","pages":"e00052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810015/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scalp Incisions With Stairstep Pericranial Edges to Minimize Sequalae from Poor Wound Healing in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Surgery: A Technical Note With Early Results.\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas Popp, Ishan Singhal, Brandon Laing, Kate B Krucoff, Max O Krucoff\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Wound healing problems are especially prevalent in craniotomies for intra-axial brain tumors as patients often require radiation, chemotherapy, and chronic steroids. Although newer techniques such as minimally invasive approaches and routine vancomycin powder use have helped overall complication rates, poor skin healing remains a frustratingly persistent cause of morbidity. Therefore, here we describe the novel technique of elevating and closing a stairstep pericranial edge offset from the skin incision to protect hardware and support wound healing, and we report early outcomes using this technique.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ninety-one consecutive patients underwent supratentorial, intra-axial brain tumor surgery with a single surgeon at a single institution using this technique. Patient demographics, pathology, adjuvant interventions, and other independent risk factors were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No wound-related complications requiring readmission, intravenous antibiotics, or reoperation were encountered at a median 3-month follow-up. There were also no surgical site infections, dehiscences, or cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Fifty-one patients (57.3%) had postoperative radiotherapy, 85 patients (93.4%) had perioperative steroids, and 56 patients (61.5%) had postoperative chemotherapy. Six patients (6.5%) were placed on a short course of oral antibiotics perioperatively due to concerns with initial scalp healing (ie, excessive scabbing at follow-up), none of whom progressed to infection or required further intervention. These are the cases where this technique is felt to have been most helpful by potentially preventing worse sequelae. One patient developed a shunt infection during this interval that required removal unrelated to the craniotomy site.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Here we outline in detail the principles, design, and execution of incisions and closures with stairstep pericranial edges in supratentorial brain surgery. This technique was designed in consultation with plastic surgeons to provide an intact, vascularized layer of pericranium beneath the healing skin and over the bone graft/hardware to optimize wound healing conditions and prevent morbid sequelae in inevitable cases of poor initial healing. Early results are promising.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery practice\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"e00052\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11810015/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:伤口愈合问题在轴内脑肿瘤开颅手术中尤为普遍,因为患者通常需要放疗、化疗和慢性类固醇治疗。虽然较新的技术,如微创方法和常规万古霉素粉末的使用已经降低了总体并发症发生率,但令人沮丧的是,皮肤愈合不良仍然是发病率的一个持续原因。因此,我们在这里描述了一种新的技术,即从皮肤切口处提升和关闭台阶颅周边缘偏移,以保护硬体并支持伤口愈合,我们报告了使用该技术的早期结果。方法:91例患者连续接受幕上、轴内脑肿瘤手术,由同一位外科医生在同一家机构使用该技术。分析患者人口统计学、病理、辅助干预和其他独立危险因素。结果:在中位3个月的随访中,没有出现需要再入院、静脉注射抗生素或再次手术的伤口相关并发症。也没有手术部位感染、裂开或脑脊液泄漏。术后放疗51例(57.3%),围手术期类固醇85例(93.4%),化疗56例(61.5%)。由于担心最初的头皮愈合(即随访时过度结痂),6例患者(6.5%)在围手术期接受短期口服抗生素治疗,没有一例进展为感染或需要进一步干预。在这些情况下,这种技术被认为是最有帮助的,因为它有可能预防更严重的后遗症。一名患者在此期间发生分流感染,需要切除与开颅部位无关的分流管。结论:在此,我们详细概述了幕上脑外科手术中阶梯状颅周边缘切口和闭合的原理、设计和实施。这项技术是在与整形外科医生协商后设计的,目的是在愈合的皮肤下和骨移植物/硬件上提供完整的、带血管的包皮层,以优化伤口愈合条件,并防止在不可避免的初始愈合不良的情况下出现病态的后遗症。早期的结果很有希望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Scalp Incisions With Stairstep Pericranial Edges to Minimize Sequalae from Poor Wound Healing in Supratentorial Brain Tumor Surgery: A Technical Note With Early Results.

Background and objectives: Wound healing problems are especially prevalent in craniotomies for intra-axial brain tumors as patients often require radiation, chemotherapy, and chronic steroids. Although newer techniques such as minimally invasive approaches and routine vancomycin powder use have helped overall complication rates, poor skin healing remains a frustratingly persistent cause of morbidity. Therefore, here we describe the novel technique of elevating and closing a stairstep pericranial edge offset from the skin incision to protect hardware and support wound healing, and we report early outcomes using this technique.

Methods: Ninety-one consecutive patients underwent supratentorial, intra-axial brain tumor surgery with a single surgeon at a single institution using this technique. Patient demographics, pathology, adjuvant interventions, and other independent risk factors were analyzed.

Results: No wound-related complications requiring readmission, intravenous antibiotics, or reoperation were encountered at a median 3-month follow-up. There were also no surgical site infections, dehiscences, or cerebrospinal fluid leaks. Fifty-one patients (57.3%) had postoperative radiotherapy, 85 patients (93.4%) had perioperative steroids, and 56 patients (61.5%) had postoperative chemotherapy. Six patients (6.5%) were placed on a short course of oral antibiotics perioperatively due to concerns with initial scalp healing (ie, excessive scabbing at follow-up), none of whom progressed to infection or required further intervention. These are the cases where this technique is felt to have been most helpful by potentially preventing worse sequelae. One patient developed a shunt infection during this interval that required removal unrelated to the craniotomy site.

Conclusion: Here we outline in detail the principles, design, and execution of incisions and closures with stairstep pericranial edges in supratentorial brain surgery. This technique was designed in consultation with plastic surgeons to provide an intact, vascularized layer of pericranium beneath the healing skin and over the bone graft/hardware to optimize wound healing conditions and prevent morbid sequelae in inevitable cases of poor initial healing. Early results are promising.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信