右美托咪定清醒开颅术患者的心理特征:回顾性分析。

Neurosurgery practice Pub Date : 2023-12-07 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01 DOI:10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000075
Maddalena Irma Cassa, Eleonora Francesca Orena, Mirella Seveso, Francesco Acerbi, Mikael Gian Andrea Izzo, Marco Gemma
{"title":"右美托咪定清醒开颅术患者的心理特征:回顾性分析。","authors":"Maddalena Irma Cassa, Eleonora Francesca Orena, Mirella Seveso, Francesco Acerbi, Mikael Gian Andrea Izzo, Marco Gemma","doi":"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Only few studies have investigated the psychological profile of patient candidates for awake craniotomy (AC). The aim of this study was to describe the multidisciplinary clinical protocol adopted in our hospital and to retrospectively explore differences in psychological characteristic of 51 patients, analyzing association with the tolerability of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the preoperative neuropsychological assessment, the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale was administered to assess pain-related anxiety. Clinical characteristics and anesthesiological management were retrospectively recollected. The AC procedure was classified as \"optimal\" or \"suboptimal\" based on administration of rescue sedative midazolam doses because of psychomotor agitation or emotional distress in excess with respect to our anesthesiological protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The awake procedure was considered optimal in 33 cases (64.7% of total sample). General anesthesia was never required in our patients. No significant differences between optimal and suboptimal groups were found. No single variable was significant as a predictor of outcome on the univariate analysis, and no multivariate predictive model was possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although in our experience the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale score was not useful in identifying candidates for AC procedures, our multidisciplinary approach provided good results with respect to the tolerability of AC surgery. However, more studies are required to identify psychological profiles and preoperative possible warning signs to find the best course of surgery for each patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":74298,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgery practice","volume":"5 1","pages":"e00075"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783627/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Awake Craniotomy With Dexmedetomidine: A Retrospective Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Maddalena Irma Cassa, Eleonora Francesca Orena, Mirella Seveso, Francesco Acerbi, Mikael Gian Andrea Izzo, Marco Gemma\",\"doi\":\"10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000075\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Only few studies have investigated the psychological profile of patient candidates for awake craniotomy (AC). The aim of this study was to describe the multidisciplinary clinical protocol adopted in our hospital and to retrospectively explore differences in psychological characteristic of 51 patients, analyzing association with the tolerability of the procedure.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During the preoperative neuropsychological assessment, the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale was administered to assess pain-related anxiety. Clinical characteristics and anesthesiological management were retrospectively recollected. The AC procedure was classified as \\\"optimal\\\" or \\\"suboptimal\\\" based on administration of rescue sedative midazolam doses because of psychomotor agitation or emotional distress in excess with respect to our anesthesiological protocol.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The awake procedure was considered optimal in 33 cases (64.7% of total sample). General anesthesia was never required in our patients. No significant differences between optimal and suboptimal groups were found. No single variable was significant as a predictor of outcome on the univariate analysis, and no multivariate predictive model was possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although in our experience the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale score was not useful in identifying candidates for AC procedures, our multidisciplinary approach provided good results with respect to the tolerability of AC surgery. However, more studies are required to identify psychological profiles and preoperative possible warning signs to find the best course of surgery for each patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgery practice\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"e00075\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783627/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgery practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000075\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgery practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/neuprac.0000000000000075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:只有少数研究调查了清醒开颅术(AC)患者的心理特征。本研究的目的是描述我院采用的多学科临床方案,并回顾性探讨51例患者的心理特征差异,分析其与手术耐受性的关系。方法:术前神经心理评估时,采用疼痛焦虑症状量表评估疼痛相关焦虑。回顾性回顾临床特点和麻醉处理。根据我们的麻醉方案,由于精神运动激动或情绪困扰过量,基于给予抢救镇静咪达唑仑剂量,AC程序被分类为“最佳”或“次优”。结果:33例(占总样本的64.7%)被认为是最佳的唤醒程序。我们的病人从不需要全身麻醉。最优组和次优组之间无显著差异。在单变量分析中,没有单一变量作为预测结果的显著因素,也没有可能的多变量预测模型。结论:虽然根据我们的经验,疼痛焦虑症状量表评分在确定AC手术的候选人方面没有用处,但我们的多学科方法在AC手术的耐受性方面提供了良好的结果。然而,需要更多的研究来确定心理特征和术前可能的警告信号,以便为每位患者找到最佳的手术方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychological Characteristics of Patients Undergoing Awake Craniotomy With Dexmedetomidine: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background and objectives: Only few studies have investigated the psychological profile of patient candidates for awake craniotomy (AC). The aim of this study was to describe the multidisciplinary clinical protocol adopted in our hospital and to retrospectively explore differences in psychological characteristic of 51 patients, analyzing association with the tolerability of the procedure.

Methods: During the preoperative neuropsychological assessment, the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale was administered to assess pain-related anxiety. Clinical characteristics and anesthesiological management were retrospectively recollected. The AC procedure was classified as "optimal" or "suboptimal" based on administration of rescue sedative midazolam doses because of psychomotor agitation or emotional distress in excess with respect to our anesthesiological protocol.

Results: The awake procedure was considered optimal in 33 cases (64.7% of total sample). General anesthesia was never required in our patients. No significant differences between optimal and suboptimal groups were found. No single variable was significant as a predictor of outcome on the univariate analysis, and no multivariate predictive model was possible.

Conclusion: Although in our experience the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale score was not useful in identifying candidates for AC procedures, our multidisciplinary approach provided good results with respect to the tolerability of AC surgery. However, more studies are required to identify psychological profiles and preoperative possible warning signs to find the best course of surgery for each patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信